Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Melanie Subramanian, Benjamin D. Kozower, Lisa M Brown, Onkar V. Khullar, Felix G. Fernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Current studies in cardiothoracic clinical research frequently fail to use end points that are most meaningful to patients, including measures associated with quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an underused but important component of high-quality patient-centered care. Our objective was to highlight important principles of PRO measurement, describe current use in cardiothoracic operations, and discuss the potential for and challenges associated with integration of PROs into large clinical databases. Methods: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed/EMBASE databases. Clinical articles that focused on the use of PROs in cardiothoracic surgical outcomes measurement or clinical research were included in this review. Results: PROs measure the outcomes that matter most to patients and facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care. When effectively used, PRO measures have provided detailed and nuanced quality-of-life data for comparative effectiveness research. However, further steps are needed to better integrate PROs into routine clinical care. Conclusions: Incorporation of PROs into routine clinical practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient-centered care. Future integration of PROs into prospectively collected registries and databases, including that The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, has the potential to enrich comparative effectiveness research in cardiothoracic surgery.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages294-301
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Databases
Quality of Life
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Research
PubMed
Registries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Subramanian, M., Kozower, B. D., Brown, L. M., Khullar, O. V., & Fernandez, F. G. (2019). Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 107(1), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery. / Subramanian, Melanie; Kozower, Benjamin D.; Brown, Lisa M; Khullar, Onkar V.; Fernandez, Felix G.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 107, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 294-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Subramanian, M, Kozower, BD, Brown, LM, Khullar, OV & Fernandez, FG 2019, 'Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery', Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005
Subramanian, Melanie ; Kozower, Benjamin D. ; Brown, Lisa M ; Khullar, Onkar V. ; Fernandez, Felix G. / Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 107, No. 1. pp. 294-301.
@article{a61fe17d83c846ddbe75004845ebf6ab,
title = "Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery",
abstract = "Background: Current studies in cardiothoracic clinical research frequently fail to use end points that are most meaningful to patients, including measures associated with quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an underused but important component of high-quality patient-centered care. Our objective was to highlight important principles of PRO measurement, describe current use in cardiothoracic operations, and discuss the potential for and challenges associated with integration of PROs into large clinical databases. Methods: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed/EMBASE databases. Clinical articles that focused on the use of PROs in cardiothoracic surgical outcomes measurement or clinical research were included in this review. Results: PROs measure the outcomes that matter most to patients and facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care. When effectively used, PRO measures have provided detailed and nuanced quality-of-life data for comparative effectiveness research. However, further steps are needed to better integrate PROs into routine clinical care. Conclusions: Incorporation of PROs into routine clinical practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient-centered care. Future integration of PROs into prospectively collected registries and databases, including that The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, has the potential to enrich comparative effectiveness research in cardiothoracic surgery.",
author = "Melanie Subramanian and Kozower, {Benjamin D.} and Brown, {Lisa M} and Khullar, {Onkar V.} and Fernandez, {Felix G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "294--301",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery

AU - Subramanian, Melanie

AU - Kozower, Benjamin D.

AU - Brown, Lisa M

AU - Khullar, Onkar V.

AU - Fernandez, Felix G.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Current studies in cardiothoracic clinical research frequently fail to use end points that are most meaningful to patients, including measures associated with quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an underused but important component of high-quality patient-centered care. Our objective was to highlight important principles of PRO measurement, describe current use in cardiothoracic operations, and discuss the potential for and challenges associated with integration of PROs into large clinical databases. Methods: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed/EMBASE databases. Clinical articles that focused on the use of PROs in cardiothoracic surgical outcomes measurement or clinical research were included in this review. Results: PROs measure the outcomes that matter most to patients and facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care. When effectively used, PRO measures have provided detailed and nuanced quality-of-life data for comparative effectiveness research. However, further steps are needed to better integrate PROs into routine clinical care. Conclusions: Incorporation of PROs into routine clinical practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient-centered care. Future integration of PROs into prospectively collected registries and databases, including that The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, has the potential to enrich comparative effectiveness research in cardiothoracic surgery.

AB - Background: Current studies in cardiothoracic clinical research frequently fail to use end points that are most meaningful to patients, including measures associated with quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an underused but important component of high-quality patient-centered care. Our objective was to highlight important principles of PRO measurement, describe current use in cardiothoracic operations, and discuss the potential for and challenges associated with integration of PROs into large clinical databases. Methods: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed/EMBASE databases. Clinical articles that focused on the use of PROs in cardiothoracic surgical outcomes measurement or clinical research were included in this review. Results: PROs measure the outcomes that matter most to patients and facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care. When effectively used, PRO measures have provided detailed and nuanced quality-of-life data for comparative effectiveness research. However, further steps are needed to better integrate PROs into routine clinical care. Conclusions: Incorporation of PROs into routine clinical practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient-centered care. Future integration of PROs into prospectively collected registries and databases, including that The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, has the potential to enrich comparative effectiveness research in cardiothoracic surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057414790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057414790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.005

M3 - Review article

VL - 107

SP - 294

EP - 301

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

T2 - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 1

ER -