Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis

M. Mat Baki, R. Yu, J. S. Rubin, E. Chevretton, G. Sandhu, Martin Anthony Birchall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To explore unilateral vocal fold paralysis patients' perception of a proposed randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty, and to identify patients' concerns regarding their voice. Methods: Seventeen patients from five voice clinics in London were identified as being eligible for the randomised, controlled trial. Eleven of these patients (9 females and 2 males; age range, 18-65 years) were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide (they were given a minimum of 2 weeks to read through the study information sheet). The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The patients were satisfied with the clarity of the information sheet. Most of them perceived that reinnervation was a more 'attractive' option than thyroplasty. This may have been the result of certain phraseology used in the information sheet and by recruiters. Patients' main concern was reduced voice strength and the effects of this on work and social life. Conclusion: Phraseology that needed changing was identified; these changes may optimise the recruitment process for a trial. We propose using the voice handicap index 10 as the primary measure of outcome in the proposed randomised, controlled trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-701
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
Volume129
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 8 2015

Fingerprint

Laryngoplasty
Vocal Cords
Paralysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews

Keywords

  • Laryngeal Nerve Injuries
  • Laryngeal Reinnervation
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Thyroplasty
  • Vocal Cord Paralysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. / Mat Baki, M.; Yu, R.; Rubin, J. S.; Chevretton, E.; Sandhu, G.; Birchall, Martin Anthony.

In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol. 129, No. 7, 08.07.2015, p. 693-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mat Baki, M. ; Yu, R. ; Rubin, J. S. ; Chevretton, E. ; Sandhu, G. ; Birchall, Martin Anthony. / Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2015 ; Vol. 129, No. 7. pp. 693-701.
@article{743daf401adb42d4b6ae871e41ca9364,
title = "Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis",
abstract = "Objectives: To explore unilateral vocal fold paralysis patients' perception of a proposed randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty, and to identify patients' concerns regarding their voice. Methods: Seventeen patients from five voice clinics in London were identified as being eligible for the randomised, controlled trial. Eleven of these patients (9 females and 2 males; age range, 18-65 years) were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide (they were given a minimum of 2 weeks to read through the study information sheet). The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The patients were satisfied with the clarity of the information sheet. Most of them perceived that reinnervation was a more 'attractive' option than thyroplasty. This may have been the result of certain phraseology used in the information sheet and by recruiters. Patients' main concern was reduced voice strength and the effects of this on work and social life. Conclusion: Phraseology that needed changing was identified; these changes may optimise the recruitment process for a trial. We propose using the voice handicap index 10 as the primary measure of outcome in the proposed randomised, controlled trial.",
keywords = "Laryngeal Nerve Injuries, Laryngeal Reinnervation, Randomized Controlled Trial, Thyroplasty, Vocal Cord Paralysis",
author = "{Mat Baki}, M. and R. Yu and Rubin, {J. S.} and E. Chevretton and G. Sandhu and Birchall, {Martin Anthony}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0022215115000985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "693--701",
journal = "Journal of Laryngology and Otology",
issn = "0022-2151",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis

AU - Mat Baki, M.

AU - Yu, R.

AU - Rubin, J. S.

AU - Chevretton, E.

AU - Sandhu, G.

AU - Birchall, Martin Anthony

PY - 2015/7/8

Y1 - 2015/7/8

N2 - Objectives: To explore unilateral vocal fold paralysis patients' perception of a proposed randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty, and to identify patients' concerns regarding their voice. Methods: Seventeen patients from five voice clinics in London were identified as being eligible for the randomised, controlled trial. Eleven of these patients (9 females and 2 males; age range, 18-65 years) were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide (they were given a minimum of 2 weeks to read through the study information sheet). The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The patients were satisfied with the clarity of the information sheet. Most of them perceived that reinnervation was a more 'attractive' option than thyroplasty. This may have been the result of certain phraseology used in the information sheet and by recruiters. Patients' main concern was reduced voice strength and the effects of this on work and social life. Conclusion: Phraseology that needed changing was identified; these changes may optimise the recruitment process for a trial. We propose using the voice handicap index 10 as the primary measure of outcome in the proposed randomised, controlled trial.

AB - Objectives: To explore unilateral vocal fold paralysis patients' perception of a proposed randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty, and to identify patients' concerns regarding their voice. Methods: Seventeen patients from five voice clinics in London were identified as being eligible for the randomised, controlled trial. Eleven of these patients (9 females and 2 males; age range, 18-65 years) were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide (they were given a minimum of 2 weeks to read through the study information sheet). The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The patients were satisfied with the clarity of the information sheet. Most of them perceived that reinnervation was a more 'attractive' option than thyroplasty. This may have been the result of certain phraseology used in the information sheet and by recruiters. Patients' main concern was reduced voice strength and the effects of this on work and social life. Conclusion: Phraseology that needed changing was identified; these changes may optimise the recruitment process for a trial. We propose using the voice handicap index 10 as the primary measure of outcome in the proposed randomised, controlled trial.

KW - Laryngeal Nerve Injuries

KW - Laryngeal Reinnervation

KW - Randomized Controlled Trial

KW - Thyroplasty

KW - Vocal Cord Paralysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938154090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938154090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022215115000985

DO - 10.1017/S0022215115000985

M3 - Article

C2 - 26153838

AN - SCOPUS:84938154090

VL - 129

SP - 693

EP - 701

JO - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

JF - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

SN - 0022-2151

IS - 7

ER -