Patient outcomes in academic medical centers

Influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon

Saman Arbabi, Gregory Jurkovich, Frederick P. Rivara, Avery B. Nathens, Maria Moore, Gerald B. Demarest, Ronald V. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are very few data on characteristics or policies that improve patient outcomes in academic medical institutions. We were interested in 2 such policies or characteristics that are commonly implemented in academic centers: an in-house on-call attending physician policy and the existence of postgraduate medical education. Hypothesis: An in-house attending surgeon on-call policy and the presence of trauma and critical care fellowship programs improve outcomes of critically injured patients. Design: Multicenter cohort study. Two cohorts were analyzed: blunt trauma (n=601; mortality, 16.0%) and penetrating abdominal trauma (n = 503; mortality, 7.5%). Setting: Thirty-one academic level I trauma centers, 10 (32.3%) with in-house on-call policy and 11 (35.5%) with fellowship programs. Main Outcome Measures: Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Results: In-house on-call surgeon policy had no impact on mortality or length of hospital or intensive care unit stay for either the blunt or penetrating trauma cohort. However, the presence of fellowship programs was associated with a significant decrease in blunt trauma mortality (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.8) and a decrease in length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference, 4.7 days; 95% CI, 0.6-8.8 days) and hospital stay (mean difference, 3.2 days; 95% CI, 0.6-5.9 days). There were no significant effects of fellowship programs on penetrating trauma outcomes. Conclusions: An in-house on-call attending surgeon policy is not associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, presence of a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program, a potential surrogate marker for an institution that is committed to this specialty interest, is associated with improved outcomes for critically injured patients. An investment in advanced postgraduate medical education has potential benefits in patient care and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-51
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume138
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

House Calls
Wounds and Injuries
Length of Stay
Mortality
Intensive Care Units
Confidence Intervals
Critical Care
Medical Education
Trauma Centers
Surgeons
Multicenter Studies
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Biomarkers
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Patient outcomes in academic medical centers : Influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon. / Arbabi, Saman; Jurkovich, Gregory; Rivara, Frederick P.; Nathens, Avery B.; Moore, Maria; Demarest, Gerald B.; Maier, Ronald V.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 138, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 47-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arbabi, Saman ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Rivara, Frederick P. ; Nathens, Avery B. ; Moore, Maria ; Demarest, Gerald B. ; Maier, Ronald V. / Patient outcomes in academic medical centers : Influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon. In: Archives of Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 138, No. 1. pp. 47-51.
@article{82839a3522324ee9af6eac0468687a88,
title = "Patient outcomes in academic medical centers: Influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon",
abstract = "Background: There are very few data on characteristics or policies that improve patient outcomes in academic medical institutions. We were interested in 2 such policies or characteristics that are commonly implemented in academic centers: an in-house on-call attending physician policy and the existence of postgraduate medical education. Hypothesis: An in-house attending surgeon on-call policy and the presence of trauma and critical care fellowship programs improve outcomes of critically injured patients. Design: Multicenter cohort study. Two cohorts were analyzed: blunt trauma (n=601; mortality, 16.0{\%}) and penetrating abdominal trauma (n = 503; mortality, 7.5{\%}). Setting: Thirty-one academic level I trauma centers, 10 (32.3{\%}) with in-house on-call policy and 11 (35.5{\%}) with fellowship programs. Main Outcome Measures: Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Results: In-house on-call surgeon policy had no impact on mortality or length of hospital or intensive care unit stay for either the blunt or penetrating trauma cohort. However, the presence of fellowship programs was associated with a significant decrease in blunt trauma mortality (odds ratio, 0.4; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.8) and a decrease in length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference, 4.7 days; 95{\%} CI, 0.6-8.8 days) and hospital stay (mean difference, 3.2 days; 95{\%} CI, 0.6-5.9 days). There were no significant effects of fellowship programs on penetrating trauma outcomes. Conclusions: An in-house on-call attending surgeon policy is not associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, presence of a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program, a potential surrogate marker for an institution that is committed to this specialty interest, is associated with improved outcomes for critically injured patients. An investment in advanced postgraduate medical education has potential benefits in patient care and outcomes.",
author = "Saman Arbabi and Gregory Jurkovich and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Nathens, {Avery B.} and Maria Moore and Demarest, {Gerald B.} and Maier, {Ronald V.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.138.1.47",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "47--51",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient outcomes in academic medical centers

T2 - Influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon

AU - Arbabi, Saman

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Moore, Maria

AU - Demarest, Gerald B.

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Background: There are very few data on characteristics or policies that improve patient outcomes in academic medical institutions. We were interested in 2 such policies or characteristics that are commonly implemented in academic centers: an in-house on-call attending physician policy and the existence of postgraduate medical education. Hypothesis: An in-house attending surgeon on-call policy and the presence of trauma and critical care fellowship programs improve outcomes of critically injured patients. Design: Multicenter cohort study. Two cohorts were analyzed: blunt trauma (n=601; mortality, 16.0%) and penetrating abdominal trauma (n = 503; mortality, 7.5%). Setting: Thirty-one academic level I trauma centers, 10 (32.3%) with in-house on-call policy and 11 (35.5%) with fellowship programs. Main Outcome Measures: Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Results: In-house on-call surgeon policy had no impact on mortality or length of hospital or intensive care unit stay for either the blunt or penetrating trauma cohort. However, the presence of fellowship programs was associated with a significant decrease in blunt trauma mortality (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.8) and a decrease in length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference, 4.7 days; 95% CI, 0.6-8.8 days) and hospital stay (mean difference, 3.2 days; 95% CI, 0.6-5.9 days). There were no significant effects of fellowship programs on penetrating trauma outcomes. Conclusions: An in-house on-call attending surgeon policy is not associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, presence of a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program, a potential surrogate marker for an institution that is committed to this specialty interest, is associated with improved outcomes for critically injured patients. An investment in advanced postgraduate medical education has potential benefits in patient care and outcomes.

AB - Background: There are very few data on characteristics or policies that improve patient outcomes in academic medical institutions. We were interested in 2 such policies or characteristics that are commonly implemented in academic centers: an in-house on-call attending physician policy and the existence of postgraduate medical education. Hypothesis: An in-house attending surgeon on-call policy and the presence of trauma and critical care fellowship programs improve outcomes of critically injured patients. Design: Multicenter cohort study. Two cohorts were analyzed: blunt trauma (n=601; mortality, 16.0%) and penetrating abdominal trauma (n = 503; mortality, 7.5%). Setting: Thirty-one academic level I trauma centers, 10 (32.3%) with in-house on-call policy and 11 (35.5%) with fellowship programs. Main Outcome Measures: Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Results: In-house on-call surgeon policy had no impact on mortality or length of hospital or intensive care unit stay for either the blunt or penetrating trauma cohort. However, the presence of fellowship programs was associated with a significant decrease in blunt trauma mortality (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.8) and a decrease in length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference, 4.7 days; 95% CI, 0.6-8.8 days) and hospital stay (mean difference, 3.2 days; 95% CI, 0.6-5.9 days). There were no significant effects of fellowship programs on penetrating trauma outcomes. Conclusions: An in-house on-call attending surgeon policy is not associated with improved outcomes. In contrast, presence of a trauma and surgical critical care fellowship program, a potential surrogate marker for an institution that is committed to this specialty interest, is associated with improved outcomes for critically injured patients. An investment in advanced postgraduate medical education has potential benefits in patient care and outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037227606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037227606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.47

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.47

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 47

EP - 51

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 1

ER -