Pathologizing suffering and the pursuit of a peaceful death

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The specialty of psychiatry has a long-standing, virtually monolithic view that a desire to die, even a desire for a hastened death among the terminally ill, is a manifestation of mental illness. Recently, psychiatry has made significant inroads into hospice and palliative care, and in doing so brings with it the conviction that dying patients who seek to end their suffering by asserting control over the time and manner of their inevitable death should be provided with psychotherapeutic measures rather than having their expressed wishes respected as though their desire for an earlier death were the rational choice of someone with decisional capacity. This article reviews and critiques this approach from the perspective of recent clinical data indicating that patients who secure and utilize a lethal prescription are generally exercising an autonomous choice unencumbered by clinical depression or other forms of incapacitating mental illness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-416
Number of pages14
JournalCambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
death
psychiatry
mental illness
Psychiatry
Hospice Care
Terminally Ill
hospice
dying
Palliative Care
Prescriptions
medication
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{536f4a0bee494db287ab871d09a526a2,
title = "Pathologizing suffering and the pursuit of a peaceful death",
abstract = "The specialty of psychiatry has a long-standing, virtually monolithic view that a desire to die, even a desire for a hastened death among the terminally ill, is a manifestation of mental illness. Recently, psychiatry has made significant inroads into hospice and palliative care, and in doing so brings with it the conviction that dying patients who seek to end their suffering by asserting control over the time and manner of their inevitable death should be provided with psychotherapeutic measures rather than having their expressed wishes respected as though their desire for an earlier death were the rational choice of someone with decisional capacity. This article reviews and critiques this approach from the perspective of recent clinical data indicating that patients who secure and utilize a lethal prescription are generally exercising an autonomous choice unencumbered by clinical depression or other forms of incapacitating mental illness.",
author = "Rich, {Ben A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0963180114000085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "403--416",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathologizing suffering and the pursuit of a peaceful death

AU - Rich, Ben A.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - The specialty of psychiatry has a long-standing, virtually monolithic view that a desire to die, even a desire for a hastened death among the terminally ill, is a manifestation of mental illness. Recently, psychiatry has made significant inroads into hospice and palliative care, and in doing so brings with it the conviction that dying patients who seek to end their suffering by asserting control over the time and manner of their inevitable death should be provided with psychotherapeutic measures rather than having their expressed wishes respected as though their desire for an earlier death were the rational choice of someone with decisional capacity. This article reviews and critiques this approach from the perspective of recent clinical data indicating that patients who secure and utilize a lethal prescription are generally exercising an autonomous choice unencumbered by clinical depression or other forms of incapacitating mental illness.

AB - The specialty of psychiatry has a long-standing, virtually monolithic view that a desire to die, even a desire for a hastened death among the terminally ill, is a manifestation of mental illness. Recently, psychiatry has made significant inroads into hospice and palliative care, and in doing so brings with it the conviction that dying patients who seek to end their suffering by asserting control over the time and manner of their inevitable death should be provided with psychotherapeutic measures rather than having their expressed wishes respected as though their desire for an earlier death were the rational choice of someone with decisional capacity. This article reviews and critiques this approach from the perspective of recent clinical data indicating that patients who secure and utilize a lethal prescription are generally exercising an autonomous choice unencumbered by clinical depression or other forms of incapacitating mental illness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027919181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027919181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180114000085

DO - 10.1017/S0963180114000085

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25032505

AN - SCOPUS:85027919181

VL - 23

SP - 403

EP - 416

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 4

ER -