Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation

Sarah E. Forster, Cameron S Carter, Jonathan D. Cohen, Raymond Y. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mechanisms by which the brain monitors and modulates performance are an important focus of recent research. The conflict-monitoring hypothesis posits that the ACC detects conflict between competing response pathways which, in turn, signals for enhanced control. The N2, an ERP component that has been localized to ACC, has been observed after high conflict stimuli. As a candidate index of the conflict signal, the N2 would be expected to be sensitive to the degree of response conflict present, a factor that depends on both the features of external stimuli and the internal control state. In the present study, we sought to explore the relationship between N2 amplitude and these variables through use of a modified Eriksen flankers task in which target-distracter compatibility was parametrically varied. We hypothesized that greater target-distracter incompatibility would result in higher levels of response conflict, as indexed by both behavior and the N2 component. Consistent with this prediction, there were parametric degradations in behavioral performance and increases in N2 amplitudes with increasing incompatibility. Further, increasingly incompatible stimuli led to the predicted parametric increases in control on subsequent incompatible trials as evidenced by enhanced performance and reduced N2 amplitudes. These findings suggest that the N2 component and associated behavioral performance are finely sensitive to the degree of response conflict present and to the control adjustments that result from modulations in conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-935
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Internal-External Control
Conflict (Psychology)
Brain
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation. / Forster, Sarah E.; Carter, Cameron S; Cohen, Jonathan D.; Cho, Raymond Y.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 923-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forster, Sarah E. ; Carter, Cameron S ; Cohen, Jonathan D. ; Cho, Raymond Y. / Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 923-935.
@article{11f89b2aaff24736b82564c797735698,
title = "Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation",
abstract = "Mechanisms by which the brain monitors and modulates performance are an important focus of recent research. The conflict-monitoring hypothesis posits that the ACC detects conflict between competing response pathways which, in turn, signals for enhanced control. The N2, an ERP component that has been localized to ACC, has been observed after high conflict stimuli. As a candidate index of the conflict signal, the N2 would be expected to be sensitive to the degree of response conflict present, a factor that depends on both the features of external stimuli and the internal control state. In the present study, we sought to explore the relationship between N2 amplitude and these variables through use of a modified Eriksen flankers task in which target-distracter compatibility was parametrically varied. We hypothesized that greater target-distracter incompatibility would result in higher levels of response conflict, as indexed by both behavior and the N2 component. Consistent with this prediction, there were parametric degradations in behavioral performance and increases in N2 amplitudes with increasing incompatibility. Further, increasingly incompatible stimuli led to the predicted parametric increases in control on subsequent incompatible trials as evidenced by enhanced performance and reduced N2 amplitudes. These findings suggest that the N2 component and associated behavioral performance are finely sensitive to the degree of response conflict present and to the control adjustments that result from modulations in conflict.",
author = "Forster, {Sarah E.} and Carter, {Cameron S} and Cohen, {Jonathan D.} and Cho, {Raymond Y.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1162/jocn.2010.21458",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "923--935",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation

AU - Forster, Sarah E.

AU - Carter, Cameron S

AU - Cohen, Jonathan D.

AU - Cho, Raymond Y.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Mechanisms by which the brain monitors and modulates performance are an important focus of recent research. The conflict-monitoring hypothesis posits that the ACC detects conflict between competing response pathways which, in turn, signals for enhanced control. The N2, an ERP component that has been localized to ACC, has been observed after high conflict stimuli. As a candidate index of the conflict signal, the N2 would be expected to be sensitive to the degree of response conflict present, a factor that depends on both the features of external stimuli and the internal control state. In the present study, we sought to explore the relationship between N2 amplitude and these variables through use of a modified Eriksen flankers task in which target-distracter compatibility was parametrically varied. We hypothesized that greater target-distracter incompatibility would result in higher levels of response conflict, as indexed by both behavior and the N2 component. Consistent with this prediction, there were parametric degradations in behavioral performance and increases in N2 amplitudes with increasing incompatibility. Further, increasingly incompatible stimuli led to the predicted parametric increases in control on subsequent incompatible trials as evidenced by enhanced performance and reduced N2 amplitudes. These findings suggest that the N2 component and associated behavioral performance are finely sensitive to the degree of response conflict present and to the control adjustments that result from modulations in conflict.

AB - Mechanisms by which the brain monitors and modulates performance are an important focus of recent research. The conflict-monitoring hypothesis posits that the ACC detects conflict between competing response pathways which, in turn, signals for enhanced control. The N2, an ERP component that has been localized to ACC, has been observed after high conflict stimuli. As a candidate index of the conflict signal, the N2 would be expected to be sensitive to the degree of response conflict present, a factor that depends on both the features of external stimuli and the internal control state. In the present study, we sought to explore the relationship between N2 amplitude and these variables through use of a modified Eriksen flankers task in which target-distracter compatibility was parametrically varied. We hypothesized that greater target-distracter incompatibility would result in higher levels of response conflict, as indexed by both behavior and the N2 component. Consistent with this prediction, there were parametric degradations in behavioral performance and increases in N2 amplitudes with increasing incompatibility. Further, increasingly incompatible stimuli led to the predicted parametric increases in control on subsequent incompatible trials as evidenced by enhanced performance and reduced N2 amplitudes. These findings suggest that the N2 component and associated behavioral performance are finely sensitive to the degree of response conflict present and to the control adjustments that result from modulations in conflict.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650766109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650766109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21458

DO - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21458

M3 - Article

C2 - 20146615

AN - SCOPUS:78650766109

VL - 23

SP - 923

EP - 935

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 4

ER -