Parameters of Consultee Satisfaction With Inpatient Academic Psychiatric Consultation Services: A Multicenter Study

Mallika Lavakumar, Emily D. Gastelum, Tse Hwei Choo, Jonathan S. Gerkin, Debra R Kahn, Seonjoo Lee, Stephen E. Nicolson, Lisa J. Rosenthal, Ann C. Schwartz, Marie B. Tobin, Ralph N. Wharton, Peter A. Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Consultation-liaison psychiatrists commonly perceive consultee satisfaction as a useful global measure of consultation-liaison service performance. No tool exists to measure consultee satisfaction. A single-site study at Columbia University Medical Center elicited ratings of parameters importantly contributing to consultee satisfaction within consultation-liaison services. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the generalizability of the rating of importance of these parameters in a larger, multicenter sample. Methods: From October 2013 to January 2014, a confidential and voluntary Web-based survey was distributed to 133 physicians at 7 academic centers in the United States asking them to rate the importance of 16 performance parameters (identified in the previous single-site study) in determining consultee satisfaction. Results: Overall, 87 recipients (65%) responded to the survey. Among all the 16 items, there was no significant difference between sites in ratings of item importance. Of the 16 parameters, 9 received a mean rating in the "important" to "very important" range. Three items, "completion of consultation within 24 hours of request," "understanding the core questions being asked," and "practical and helpful management suggestions for medical staff" were rated as the most important. Quickly managing behavioral problems, management suggestions for nursing staff, verbal communication of recommendations, providing diagnostic clarification, facilitating transfer to inpatient psychiatry, and providing follow-up consultation were other parameters that were highly valued by consultees. Conclusions: We found good generalizability across academic medical centers for ratings of parameters important for consultee satisfaction with consultation-liaison services, which can provide the basis for a consultee satisfaction measurement tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-267
Number of pages6
JournalPsychosomatics
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Parameters of Consultee Satisfaction With Inpatient Academic Psychiatric Consultation Services: A Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this