Paediatric tele-emergency care

A study of two delivery models

Paula A. Weigel, Kimberly A.S. Merchant, Amy Wittrock, Jamie Kissee, Fred Ullrich, Amanda L. Bell, James P Marcin, Marcia M. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Tele-emergency models have been utilized for decades, with growing evidence of their effectiveness. Due to the variety of tele-emergency department (tele-ED) models used in practice, however, it is challenging to build standardized metrics for ongoing evaluation. This study describes two tele-ED programs, one specialized and one general, that provide care to paediatric populations. Through an examination of model structures and patient populations, we gain insight into how evaluative measures should reflect tele-ED model design and purpose. Methods: Qualitative descriptions of the two tele-ED models are presented. We show a retrospective cohort analysis describing paediatric patients’ key characteristics, reasons for visit, and disposition status by case/control status. Case/control patient encounter data were collected October 2015 through December 2017 from 15 spoke hospitals within each tele-ED program. Results: The two tele-ED models serve distinct paediatric populations, and measures of tele-ED utilization and disposition reflect those differences. In the specialized University of California (UC) Davis Health program, tele-ED was utilized in 36% of paediatric critical care encounters and 78% of those were transferred. In the Avera eCARE program, tele-ED was activated in 1.7% of paediatric encounters and 50.6% of those were transferred. When Avera eCARE paediatric encounters were stratified by severity, measures of tele-ED use and disposition status among high-severity encounters were more similar to UC Davis Health. Discussion: This study describes how design choices of tele-ED models have implications for evaluative measures. Measures of tele-ED model success need to reflect model purpose, populations served, and for whom tele-ED service use is appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics
Population
Health
Critical Care
Emergencies
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • disposition
  • paediatric population
  • rural
  • tele-emergency
  • Telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Weigel, P. A., Merchant, K. A. S., Wittrock, A., Kissee, J., Ullrich, F., Bell, A. L., ... M. Ward, M. (2019). Paediatric tele-emergency care: A study of two delivery models. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19839610

Paediatric tele-emergency care : A study of two delivery models. / Weigel, Paula A.; Merchant, Kimberly A.S.; Wittrock, Amy; Kissee, Jamie; Ullrich, Fred; Bell, Amanda L.; Marcin, James P; M. Ward, Marcia.

In: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weigel, Paula A. ; Merchant, Kimberly A.S. ; Wittrock, Amy ; Kissee, Jamie ; Ullrich, Fred ; Bell, Amanda L. ; Marcin, James P ; M. Ward, Marcia. / Paediatric tele-emergency care : A study of two delivery models. In: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2019.
@article{7d3329673c494b96844acd00d4d2c5f1,
title = "Paediatric tele-emergency care: A study of two delivery models",
abstract = "Introduction: Tele-emergency models have been utilized for decades, with growing evidence of their effectiveness. Due to the variety of tele-emergency department (tele-ED) models used in practice, however, it is challenging to build standardized metrics for ongoing evaluation. This study describes two tele-ED programs, one specialized and one general, that provide care to paediatric populations. Through an examination of model structures and patient populations, we gain insight into how evaluative measures should reflect tele-ED model design and purpose. Methods: Qualitative descriptions of the two tele-ED models are presented. We show a retrospective cohort analysis describing paediatric patients’ key characteristics, reasons for visit, and disposition status by case/control status. Case/control patient encounter data were collected October 2015 through December 2017 from 15 spoke hospitals within each tele-ED program. Results: The two tele-ED models serve distinct paediatric populations, and measures of tele-ED utilization and disposition reflect those differences. In the specialized University of California (UC) Davis Health program, tele-ED was utilized in 36{\%} of paediatric critical care encounters and 78{\%} of those were transferred. In the Avera eCARE program, tele-ED was activated in 1.7{\%} of paediatric encounters and 50.6{\%} of those were transferred. When Avera eCARE paediatric encounters were stratified by severity, measures of tele-ED use and disposition status among high-severity encounters were more similar to UC Davis Health. Discussion: This study describes how design choices of tele-ED models have implications for evaluative measures. Measures of tele-ED model success need to reflect model purpose, populations served, and for whom tele-ED service use is appropriate.",
keywords = "disposition, paediatric population, rural, tele-emergency, Telemedicine",
author = "Weigel, {Paula A.} and Merchant, {Kimberly A.S.} and Amy Wittrock and Jamie Kissee and Fred Ullrich and Bell, {Amanda L.} and Marcin, {James P} and {M. Ward}, Marcia",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1357633X19839610",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare",
issn = "1357-633X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paediatric tele-emergency care

T2 - A study of two delivery models

AU - Weigel, Paula A.

AU - Merchant, Kimberly A.S.

AU - Wittrock, Amy

AU - Kissee, Jamie

AU - Ullrich, Fred

AU - Bell, Amanda L.

AU - Marcin, James P

AU - M. Ward, Marcia

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Tele-emergency models have been utilized for decades, with growing evidence of their effectiveness. Due to the variety of tele-emergency department (tele-ED) models used in practice, however, it is challenging to build standardized metrics for ongoing evaluation. This study describes two tele-ED programs, one specialized and one general, that provide care to paediatric populations. Through an examination of model structures and patient populations, we gain insight into how evaluative measures should reflect tele-ED model design and purpose. Methods: Qualitative descriptions of the two tele-ED models are presented. We show a retrospective cohort analysis describing paediatric patients’ key characteristics, reasons for visit, and disposition status by case/control status. Case/control patient encounter data were collected October 2015 through December 2017 from 15 spoke hospitals within each tele-ED program. Results: The two tele-ED models serve distinct paediatric populations, and measures of tele-ED utilization and disposition reflect those differences. In the specialized University of California (UC) Davis Health program, tele-ED was utilized in 36% of paediatric critical care encounters and 78% of those were transferred. In the Avera eCARE program, tele-ED was activated in 1.7% of paediatric encounters and 50.6% of those were transferred. When Avera eCARE paediatric encounters were stratified by severity, measures of tele-ED use and disposition status among high-severity encounters were more similar to UC Davis Health. Discussion: This study describes how design choices of tele-ED models have implications for evaluative measures. Measures of tele-ED model success need to reflect model purpose, populations served, and for whom tele-ED service use is appropriate.

AB - Introduction: Tele-emergency models have been utilized for decades, with growing evidence of their effectiveness. Due to the variety of tele-emergency department (tele-ED) models used in practice, however, it is challenging to build standardized metrics for ongoing evaluation. This study describes two tele-ED programs, one specialized and one general, that provide care to paediatric populations. Through an examination of model structures and patient populations, we gain insight into how evaluative measures should reflect tele-ED model design and purpose. Methods: Qualitative descriptions of the two tele-ED models are presented. We show a retrospective cohort analysis describing paediatric patients’ key characteristics, reasons for visit, and disposition status by case/control status. Case/control patient encounter data were collected October 2015 through December 2017 from 15 spoke hospitals within each tele-ED program. Results: The two tele-ED models serve distinct paediatric populations, and measures of tele-ED utilization and disposition reflect those differences. In the specialized University of California (UC) Davis Health program, tele-ED was utilized in 36% of paediatric critical care encounters and 78% of those were transferred. In the Avera eCARE program, tele-ED was activated in 1.7% of paediatric encounters and 50.6% of those were transferred. When Avera eCARE paediatric encounters were stratified by severity, measures of tele-ED use and disposition status among high-severity encounters were more similar to UC Davis Health. Discussion: This study describes how design choices of tele-ED models have implications for evaluative measures. Measures of tele-ED model success need to reflect model purpose, populations served, and for whom tele-ED service use is appropriate.

KW - disposition

KW - paediatric population

KW - rural

KW - tele-emergency

KW - Telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064283051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064283051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1357633X19839610

DO - 10.1177/1357633X19839610

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

JF - Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

SN - 1357-633X

ER -