### Abstract

H. A. David and C. C. Yang, Iowa State University, have noted the following points. The author does not stay with his own definition of D_{T}(n, q) but in fact usesDT(n,q)=E{T(z1,,ċċċ,zn-q, ∞,...,∞)}.Even with this change the proof of the theorem on p. 176 is in error since the combinatorial term associated with δ_{n-r} should be(n-qn-r),not(n-qr).However, since δ_{n-r} = δ_{n-q}, the theorem follows directly from Case 2 of David & Groeneveld (1982), and has essentially been proved by Sen (1985, pp. 309-11).

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 235-236 |

Number of pages | 2 |

Journal | Biometrika |

Volume | 77 |

Issue number | 1 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Mar 1990 |

Externally published | Yes |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Applied Mathematics
- Mathematics(all)
- Statistics and Probability
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

### Cite this

*Biometrika*,

*77*(1), 235-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/77.1.235-u

**'Outlier resistance in small samples'.** / Rocke, David M.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Biometrika*, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 235-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/77.1.235-u

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Outlier resistance in small samples'

AU - Rocke, David M

PY - 1990/3

Y1 - 1990/3

N2 - H. A. David and C. C. Yang, Iowa State University, have noted the following points. The author does not stay with his own definition of DT(n, q) but in fact usesDT(n,q)=E{T(z1,,ċċċ,zn-q, ∞,...,∞)}.Even with this change the proof of the theorem on p. 176 is in error since the combinatorial term associated with δn-r should be(n-qn-r),not(n-qr).However, since δn-r = δn-q, the theorem follows directly from Case 2 of David & Groeneveld (1982), and has essentially been proved by Sen (1985, pp. 309-11).

AB - H. A. David and C. C. Yang, Iowa State University, have noted the following points. The author does not stay with his own definition of DT(n, q) but in fact usesDT(n,q)=E{T(z1,,ċċċ,zn-q, ∞,...,∞)}.Even with this change the proof of the theorem on p. 176 is in error since the combinatorial term associated with δn-r should be(n-qn-r),not(n-qr).However, since δn-r = δn-q, the theorem follows directly from Case 2 of David & Groeneveld (1982), and has essentially been proved by Sen (1985, pp. 309-11).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956890938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956890938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/biomet/77.1.235-u

DO - 10.1093/biomet/77.1.235-u

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956890938

VL - 77

SP - 235

EP - 236

JO - Biometrika

JF - Biometrika

SN - 0006-3444

IS - 1

ER -