Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: When are they meaningful?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hand surgeons currently are challenged with the task of measuring and establishing the connection between the diagnosis and treatment of health-related quality-of-life problems. Although true quality of life cannot be measured directly, instruments in the form of questionnaires have been developed that use self-reporting to account for functional performance, health status, and health-related quality of life. Instruments must be reliable, valid, responsive, and appropriate. Misunderstanding these properties often hinders interpreting the recent stream of outcome studies in the literature. Most physicians are not sure what if any outcome information should be collected routinely or if any outcome instrument is diagnostically useful. Currently there is no convincing evidence to support the routine use of patient-based outcome measures in hand surgeons' practices. Those hand surgeons who would like to carry out an outcome study should consider seeking help from others with expertise in outcomes design and analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)993-1002
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Hand
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health Status
Physicians
Surgeons
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Generic, domain, and disease specific
  • Health status questionnaires
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Outcome instruments
  • Outcome studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Outcomes assessment in hand surgery : When are they meaningful? / Szabo, Robert M.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2001, p. 993-1002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{734dba9e66034f05bae7554982b7b398,
title = "Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: When are they meaningful?",
abstract = "Hand surgeons currently are challenged with the task of measuring and establishing the connection between the diagnosis and treatment of health-related quality-of-life problems. Although true quality of life cannot be measured directly, instruments in the form of questionnaires have been developed that use self-reporting to account for functional performance, health status, and health-related quality of life. Instruments must be reliable, valid, responsive, and appropriate. Misunderstanding these properties often hinders interpreting the recent stream of outcome studies in the literature. Most physicians are not sure what if any outcome information should be collected routinely or if any outcome instrument is diagnostically useful. Currently there is no convincing evidence to support the routine use of patient-based outcome measures in hand surgeons' practices. Those hand surgeons who would like to carry out an outcome study should consider seeking help from others with expertise in outcomes design and analysis.",
keywords = "Generic, domain, and disease specific, Health status questionnaires, Health-related quality of life, Outcome instruments, Outcome studies",
author = "Szabo, {Robert M}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "993--1002",
journal = "The Hand",
issn = "1753-1934",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes assessment in hand surgery

T2 - When are they meaningful?

AU - Szabo, Robert M

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Hand surgeons currently are challenged with the task of measuring and establishing the connection between the diagnosis and treatment of health-related quality-of-life problems. Although true quality of life cannot be measured directly, instruments in the form of questionnaires have been developed that use self-reporting to account for functional performance, health status, and health-related quality of life. Instruments must be reliable, valid, responsive, and appropriate. Misunderstanding these properties often hinders interpreting the recent stream of outcome studies in the literature. Most physicians are not sure what if any outcome information should be collected routinely or if any outcome instrument is diagnostically useful. Currently there is no convincing evidence to support the routine use of patient-based outcome measures in hand surgeons' practices. Those hand surgeons who would like to carry out an outcome study should consider seeking help from others with expertise in outcomes design and analysis.

AB - Hand surgeons currently are challenged with the task of measuring and establishing the connection between the diagnosis and treatment of health-related quality-of-life problems. Although true quality of life cannot be measured directly, instruments in the form of questionnaires have been developed that use self-reporting to account for functional performance, health status, and health-related quality of life. Instruments must be reliable, valid, responsive, and appropriate. Misunderstanding these properties often hinders interpreting the recent stream of outcome studies in the literature. Most physicians are not sure what if any outcome information should be collected routinely or if any outcome instrument is diagnostically useful. Currently there is no convincing evidence to support the routine use of patient-based outcome measures in hand surgeons' practices. Those hand surgeons who would like to carry out an outcome study should consider seeking help from others with expertise in outcomes design and analysis.

KW - Generic, domain, and disease specific

KW - Health status questionnaires

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Outcome instruments

KW - Outcome studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035188860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035188860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487

DO - 10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487

M3 - Article

C2 - 11721242

AN - SCOPUS:0035188860

VL - 26

SP - 993

EP - 1002

JO - The Hand

JF - The Hand

SN - 1753-1934

IS - 6

ER -