Outcome measures in burn care: Is mortality dead?

Clifford Pereira, Kevin Murphy, David Herndon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

127 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health care systems constantly struggle with ways to provide higher quality care in a cost-effective manner. Outcome measures serve to evaluate what works and what does not. Whether they are used for research or for the improvement of clinical practice, they are as such, efficiency markers and the first step in determining the consequences of health care. The accomplishments of the past decade have placed us in the midst of an exciting paradigm shift from what used to be primary concern (i.e. mortality), to areas that are more likely to enhance the quality of life of burn survivors. Optimal management of severely burned persons is enormously expensive, and even after survival is ensured, may require a protracted period of surgical, medical and psychological rehabilitative measures for many years. This article aims to review the outcome measures in the acute phase of burn management (mortality and morbidity from the post-burn hypermetabolic response). We further discuss long-term outcome measures (such as, quality of life measures, exercise tolerance and evaluation of return to pre-burn activities) that are now becoming of equal importance as the numbers of burn survivors increase.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)761-771
Number of pages11
JournalBurns
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Burns
Survivors
Mortality
Quality of Life
Delivery of Health Care
Exercise Tolerance
Quality of Health Care
Psychology
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Survival
Research

Keywords

  • Burn care
  • Health care systems
  • Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Outcome measures in burn care : Is mortality dead? / Pereira, Clifford; Murphy, Kevin; Herndon, David.

In: Burns, Vol. 30, No. 8, 01.12.2004, p. 761-771.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Pereira, Clifford ; Murphy, Kevin ; Herndon, David. / Outcome measures in burn care : Is mortality dead?. In: Burns. 2004 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 761-771.
@article{1395b04840f942d9af1ba32bf4ca4785,
title = "Outcome measures in burn care: Is mortality dead?",
abstract = "Health care systems constantly struggle with ways to provide higher quality care in a cost-effective manner. Outcome measures serve to evaluate what works and what does not. Whether they are used for research or for the improvement of clinical practice, they are as such, efficiency markers and the first step in determining the consequences of health care. The accomplishments of the past decade have placed us in the midst of an exciting paradigm shift from what used to be primary concern (i.e. mortality), to areas that are more likely to enhance the quality of life of burn survivors. Optimal management of severely burned persons is enormously expensive, and even after survival is ensured, may require a protracted period of surgical, medical and psychological rehabilitative measures for many years. This article aims to review the outcome measures in the acute phase of burn management (mortality and morbidity from the post-burn hypermetabolic response). We further discuss long-term outcome measures (such as, quality of life measures, exercise tolerance and evaluation of return to pre-burn activities) that are now becoming of equal importance as the numbers of burn survivors increase.",
keywords = "Burn care, Health care systems, Mortality",
author = "Clifford Pereira and Kevin Murphy and David Herndon",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2004.05.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "761--771",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome measures in burn care

T2 - Is mortality dead?

AU - Pereira, Clifford

AU - Murphy, Kevin

AU - Herndon, David

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Health care systems constantly struggle with ways to provide higher quality care in a cost-effective manner. Outcome measures serve to evaluate what works and what does not. Whether they are used for research or for the improvement of clinical practice, they are as such, efficiency markers and the first step in determining the consequences of health care. The accomplishments of the past decade have placed us in the midst of an exciting paradigm shift from what used to be primary concern (i.e. mortality), to areas that are more likely to enhance the quality of life of burn survivors. Optimal management of severely burned persons is enormously expensive, and even after survival is ensured, may require a protracted period of surgical, medical and psychological rehabilitative measures for many years. This article aims to review the outcome measures in the acute phase of burn management (mortality and morbidity from the post-burn hypermetabolic response). We further discuss long-term outcome measures (such as, quality of life measures, exercise tolerance and evaluation of return to pre-burn activities) that are now becoming of equal importance as the numbers of burn survivors increase.

AB - Health care systems constantly struggle with ways to provide higher quality care in a cost-effective manner. Outcome measures serve to evaluate what works and what does not. Whether they are used for research or for the improvement of clinical practice, they are as such, efficiency markers and the first step in determining the consequences of health care. The accomplishments of the past decade have placed us in the midst of an exciting paradigm shift from what used to be primary concern (i.e. mortality), to areas that are more likely to enhance the quality of life of burn survivors. Optimal management of severely burned persons is enormously expensive, and even after survival is ensured, may require a protracted period of surgical, medical and psychological rehabilitative measures for many years. This article aims to review the outcome measures in the acute phase of burn management (mortality and morbidity from the post-burn hypermetabolic response). We further discuss long-term outcome measures (such as, quality of life measures, exercise tolerance and evaluation of return to pre-burn activities) that are now becoming of equal importance as the numbers of burn survivors increase.

KW - Burn care

KW - Health care systems

KW - Mortality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8844229651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8844229651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2004.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2004.05.012

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15555787

AN - SCOPUS:8844229651

VL - 30

SP - 761

EP - 771

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 8

ER -