Orbital fractures: Pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction

E Bradley Strong

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1394099

Orbital fractures: Pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction

E Bradley Strong

Otolaryngology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract Among midfacial fractures, the frequency of orbital injuries is surpassed only by nasal fractures. A clear understanding of orbital anatomy and the pathophysiology of these injuries is critical to accurate diagnosis, precise surgical reconstruction, and successful clinical outcomes. This chapter reviews the mechanism of injury and pathophysiology of orbital fractures as well as the implant materials that are currently used for surgical reconstruction.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	509-517
Number of pages	9
Journal	Facial Plastic Surgery
Volume	30
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394099
State	Published - Oct 1 2014

Keywords

orbital anatomy
orbital fracture
orbital implant
orbital reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1055/s-0034-1394099

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Orbital fractures: Pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{f94f2c32e06b4775a7056522f4eba3ba,

title = "Orbital fractures: Pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction",

abstract = "Abstract Among midfacial fractures, the frequency of orbital injuries is surpassed only by nasal fractures. A clear understanding of orbital anatomy and the pathophysiology of these injuries is critical to accurate diagnosis, precise surgical reconstruction, and successful clinical outcomes. This chapter reviews the mechanism of injury and pathophysiology of orbital fractures as well as the implant materials that are currently used for surgical reconstruction.",

keywords = "orbital anatomy, orbital fracture, orbital implant, orbital reconstruction",

author = "Strong, {E Bradley}",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1394099",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "30",

pages = "509--517",

journal = "Facial Plastic Surgery",

issn = "0736-6825",

publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orbital fractures

T2 - Pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction

AU - Strong, E Bradley

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Abstract Among midfacial fractures, the frequency of orbital injuries is surpassed only by nasal fractures. A clear understanding of orbital anatomy and the pathophysiology of these injuries is critical to accurate diagnosis, precise surgical reconstruction, and successful clinical outcomes. This chapter reviews the mechanism of injury and pathophysiology of orbital fractures as well as the implant materials that are currently used for surgical reconstruction.

AB - Abstract Among midfacial fractures, the frequency of orbital injuries is surpassed only by nasal fractures. A clear understanding of orbital anatomy and the pathophysiology of these injuries is critical to accurate diagnosis, precise surgical reconstruction, and successful clinical outcomes. This chapter reviews the mechanism of injury and pathophysiology of orbital fractures as well as the implant materials that are currently used for surgical reconstruction.

KW - orbital anatomy

KW - orbital fracture

KW - orbital implant

KW - orbital reconstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928895181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928895181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1394099

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1394099

M3 - Article

C2 - 25397706

AN - SCOPUS:84928895181

VL - 30

SP - 509

EP - 517

JO - Facial Plastic Surgery

JF - Facial Plastic Surgery

SN - 0736-6825

IS - 5

ER -