Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: A pilot study in United States veterans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The direct and indirect costs of sedation limit access to screening colonoscopy amongst United States veterans. Aim: To determine if offering the option of sedation on-demand reduces the need for sedation. Design: A retrospective review of prospectively collected performance improvement data in an open access screening colonoscopy programme. Setting: Performance improvement programme to minimize the burden of sedation at a single VA Medical Center. Subjects: 44 consecutive veterans who accepted the option of sedation on-demand. They could choose to have premedications before the start of colonoscopy, or to begin colonoscopy without premedications and receive the medications upon their request during the examination. Method: Two experienced endoscopists assisted by experienced nurse assistants performed all of the examinations. Insertion of the colonoscope was aided by infusion of warm water through the colonoscope without air insufflation. Medications were administered at the veterans' request. Results: Offering the option of sedation on-demand to 44 consecutive veterans permitted 52% (N = 23) of the veterans to complete screening colonoscopy without any sedation. Conclusions: This novel approach of sedation on-demand and water infusion for screening colonoscopy deserves to be further evaluated in a randomized-controlled study amongst patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-631
Number of pages5
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: A pilot study in United States veterans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this