Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of four treatment methods

Peter L. Althausen, Mark A Lee, Christopher G. Finkemeier, John Meehan, Juan J. Rodrigo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur above a total knee arthroplasty present a challenging surgical problem for orthopedic surgeons. Numerous operative and nonoperative treatment options exist including casting, Rush rods, supracondylar nails, and plate fixation. Potentially significant complications are associated with all current treatment alternatives. Plate or nail constructs frequently achieve limited distal fixation, leading to loss of fixation and varus angulation. This complication was not observed with the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). In addition, our early results demonstrate the superiority of LISS treatment with low infection rates, no requirement for acute bone grafting, and secure fixation allowing for immediate postoperative mobilization. LISS fixation may offer a superior surgical treatment option for periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)834-839
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Keywords

  • Less-invasive stabilization system
  • Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation
  • Percutaneous plating
  • Periprosthetic fractures
  • Total knee arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of four treatment methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this