Onset patterns in autism: Variation across informants, methods, and timing

Sally J Ozonoff, Devon Gangi, Elise P. Hanzel, Alesha Hill, Monique M. Hill, Meghan Miller, A. J. Schwichtenberg, Mary Beth Steinfeld, Chandni Parikh, Ana-Maria Iosif

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While previous studies suggested that regressive forms of onset were not common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), more recent investigations suggest that the rates are quite high and may be under-reported using certain methods. The current study undertook a systematic investigation of how rates of regression differed by measurement method. Infants with (n=147) and without a family history of ASD (n=83) were seen prospectively for up to 7 visits in the first three years of life. Reports of symptom onset were collected using four measures that systematically varied the informant (examiner vs. parent), the decision type (categorical [regression absent or present] vs. dimensional [frequency of social behaviors]), and the timing of the assessment (retrospective vs. prospective). Latent class growth models were used to classify individual trajectories to see whether regressive onset patterns were infrequent or widespread within the ASD group. A majority of the sample was classified as having a regressive onset using either examiner (88%) or parent (69%) prospective dimensional ratings. Rates of regression were much lower using retrospective or categorical measures (from 29 to 47%). Agreement among different measurement methods was low. Declining trajectories of development, consistent with a regressive onset pattern, are common in children with ASD and may be more the rule than the exception. The accuracy of widely used methods of measuring onset is questionable and the present findings argue against their widespread use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAutism Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Social Behavior
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Growth

Keywords

  • Early signs
  • Infants
  • Regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Onset patterns in autism : Variation across informants, methods, and timing. / Ozonoff, Sally J; Gangi, Devon; Hanzel, Elise P.; Hill, Alesha; Hill, Monique M.; Miller, Meghan; Schwichtenberg, A. J.; Steinfeld, Mary Beth; Parikh, Chandni; Iosif, Ana-Maria.

In: Autism Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozonoff, Sally J ; Gangi, Devon ; Hanzel, Elise P. ; Hill, Alesha ; Hill, Monique M. ; Miller, Meghan ; Schwichtenberg, A. J. ; Steinfeld, Mary Beth ; Parikh, Chandni ; Iosif, Ana-Maria. / Onset patterns in autism : Variation across informants, methods, and timing. In: Autism Research. 2018.
@article{725beccb65c44e2f90e081bf6f5f6b07,
title = "Onset patterns in autism: Variation across informants, methods, and timing",
abstract = "While previous studies suggested that regressive forms of onset were not common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), more recent investigations suggest that the rates are quite high and may be under-reported using certain methods. The current study undertook a systematic investigation of how rates of regression differed by measurement method. Infants with (n=147) and without a family history of ASD (n=83) were seen prospectively for up to 7 visits in the first three years of life. Reports of symptom onset were collected using four measures that systematically varied the informant (examiner vs. parent), the decision type (categorical [regression absent or present] vs. dimensional [frequency of social behaviors]), and the timing of the assessment (retrospective vs. prospective). Latent class growth models were used to classify individual trajectories to see whether regressive onset patterns were infrequent or widespread within the ASD group. A majority of the sample was classified as having a regressive onset using either examiner (88{\%}) or parent (69{\%}) prospective dimensional ratings. Rates of regression were much lower using retrospective or categorical measures (from 29 to 47{\%}). Agreement among different measurement methods was low. Declining trajectories of development, consistent with a regressive onset pattern, are common in children with ASD and may be more the rule than the exception. The accuracy of widely used methods of measuring onset is questionable and the present findings argue against their widespread use.",
keywords = "Early signs, Infants, Regression",
author = "Ozonoff, {Sally J} and Devon Gangi and Hanzel, {Elise P.} and Alesha Hill and Hill, {Monique M.} and Meghan Miller and Schwichtenberg, {A. J.} and Steinfeld, {Mary Beth} and Chandni Parikh and Ana-Maria Iosif",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/aur.1943",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Autism Research",
issn = "1939-3806",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Onset patterns in autism

T2 - Variation across informants, methods, and timing

AU - Ozonoff, Sally J

AU - Gangi, Devon

AU - Hanzel, Elise P.

AU - Hill, Alesha

AU - Hill, Monique M.

AU - Miller, Meghan

AU - Schwichtenberg, A. J.

AU - Steinfeld, Mary Beth

AU - Parikh, Chandni

AU - Iosif, Ana-Maria

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - While previous studies suggested that regressive forms of onset were not common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), more recent investigations suggest that the rates are quite high and may be under-reported using certain methods. The current study undertook a systematic investigation of how rates of regression differed by measurement method. Infants with (n=147) and without a family history of ASD (n=83) were seen prospectively for up to 7 visits in the first three years of life. Reports of symptom onset were collected using four measures that systematically varied the informant (examiner vs. parent), the decision type (categorical [regression absent or present] vs. dimensional [frequency of social behaviors]), and the timing of the assessment (retrospective vs. prospective). Latent class growth models were used to classify individual trajectories to see whether regressive onset patterns were infrequent or widespread within the ASD group. A majority of the sample was classified as having a regressive onset using either examiner (88%) or parent (69%) prospective dimensional ratings. Rates of regression were much lower using retrospective or categorical measures (from 29 to 47%). Agreement among different measurement methods was low. Declining trajectories of development, consistent with a regressive onset pattern, are common in children with ASD and may be more the rule than the exception. The accuracy of widely used methods of measuring onset is questionable and the present findings argue against their widespread use.

AB - While previous studies suggested that regressive forms of onset were not common in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), more recent investigations suggest that the rates are quite high and may be under-reported using certain methods. The current study undertook a systematic investigation of how rates of regression differed by measurement method. Infants with (n=147) and without a family history of ASD (n=83) were seen prospectively for up to 7 visits in the first three years of life. Reports of symptom onset were collected using four measures that systematically varied the informant (examiner vs. parent), the decision type (categorical [regression absent or present] vs. dimensional [frequency of social behaviors]), and the timing of the assessment (retrospective vs. prospective). Latent class growth models were used to classify individual trajectories to see whether regressive onset patterns were infrequent or widespread within the ASD group. A majority of the sample was classified as having a regressive onset using either examiner (88%) or parent (69%) prospective dimensional ratings. Rates of regression were much lower using retrospective or categorical measures (from 29 to 47%). Agreement among different measurement methods was low. Declining trajectories of development, consistent with a regressive onset pattern, are common in children with ASD and may be more the rule than the exception. The accuracy of widely used methods of measuring onset is questionable and the present findings argue against their widespread use.

KW - Early signs

KW - Infants

KW - Regression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043575791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043575791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/aur.1943

DO - 10.1002/aur.1943

M3 - Article

C2 - 29524310

AN - SCOPUS:85043575791

JO - Autism Research

JF - Autism Research

SN - 1939-3806

ER -