On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress

Christian S. Crandall, Jeffrey Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is considerable current debate about the need for replication in the science of social psychology. Most of the current discussion and approbation is centered on direct or exact replications, the attempt to conduct a study in a manner as close to the original as possible. We focus on the value of conceptual replications, the attempt to test the same theoretical process as an existing study, but that uses methods that vary in some way from the previous study. The tension between the two kinds of replication is a tension of values—exact replications value confidence in operationalizations; their requirement tends to favor the status quo. Conceptual replications value confidence in theory; their use tends to favor rapid progress over ferreting out error. We describe the many ways in which conceptual replications can be superior to direct replications. We further argue that the social system of science is quite robust to these threats and is self-correcting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-99
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

scientific progress
Social Psychology
confidence
Values
operationalization
social psychology
science
social system
threat

Keywords

  • Conceptual replications
  • Philosophy of science
  • Replication
  • Social psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. / Crandall, Christian S.; Sherman, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 66, 01.09.2016, p. 93-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{52038b5227784a709c998af05e6d0370,
title = "On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress",
abstract = "There is considerable current debate about the need for replication in the science of social psychology. Most of the current discussion and approbation is centered on direct or exact replications, the attempt to conduct a study in a manner as close to the original as possible. We focus on the value of conceptual replications, the attempt to test the same theoretical process as an existing study, but that uses methods that vary in some way from the previous study. The tension between the two kinds of replication is a tension of values—exact replications value confidence in operationalizations; their requirement tends to favor the status quo. Conceptual replications value confidence in theory; their use tends to favor rapid progress over ferreting out error. We describe the many ways in which conceptual replications can be superior to direct replications. We further argue that the social system of science is quite robust to these threats and is self-correcting.",
keywords = "Conceptual replications, Philosophy of science, Replication, Social psychology",
author = "Crandall, {Christian S.} and Jeffrey Sherman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "93--99",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress

AU - Crandall, Christian S.

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - There is considerable current debate about the need for replication in the science of social psychology. Most of the current discussion and approbation is centered on direct or exact replications, the attempt to conduct a study in a manner as close to the original as possible. We focus on the value of conceptual replications, the attempt to test the same theoretical process as an existing study, but that uses methods that vary in some way from the previous study. The tension between the two kinds of replication is a tension of values—exact replications value confidence in operationalizations; their requirement tends to favor the status quo. Conceptual replications value confidence in theory; their use tends to favor rapid progress over ferreting out error. We describe the many ways in which conceptual replications can be superior to direct replications. We further argue that the social system of science is quite robust to these threats and is self-correcting.

AB - There is considerable current debate about the need for replication in the science of social psychology. Most of the current discussion and approbation is centered on direct or exact replications, the attempt to conduct a study in a manner as close to the original as possible. We focus on the value of conceptual replications, the attempt to test the same theoretical process as an existing study, but that uses methods that vary in some way from the previous study. The tension between the two kinds of replication is a tension of values—exact replications value confidence in operationalizations; their requirement tends to favor the status quo. Conceptual replications value confidence in theory; their use tends to favor rapid progress over ferreting out error. We describe the many ways in which conceptual replications can be superior to direct replications. We further argue that the social system of science is quite robust to these threats and is self-correcting.

KW - Conceptual replications

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Replication

KW - Social psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977100505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977100505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977100505

VL - 66

SP - 93

EP - 99

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -