On food frequency questionnaires: The contribution of open-ended questions and questions on ethnic foods

Gladys Block, Rochelle Mandel, Ellen B Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Epidemiologic studies of diet must balance the goal of comprehensiveness with that of minimizing subject and study burden. Information on the impact of certain additional questionnaire elements may aid in such decisions. Methods: We administered a food-frequency questionnaire in a large multiethnic cohort of women (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) in 1996-1997. Ancillary questionnaires asked about "any other foods you eat at least once a week" and about consumption of 8-16 ethnic foods included for respondents of Hispanic, Chinese, or Japanese ethnicity. We assessed the impact of these 2 ancillary questionnaires by examining the mean nutrient amount they contributed and their effects on rank-order correlations and categorizations of nutritional estimates. We examined the impact of ethnic foods both within the relevant ethnic group and among non-Hispanic whites. Results: Rank-order correlations (rs) between nutrient estimates with and without the open-ended question were 0.99 for almost all nutrients and all ethnic groups. Nutrient amounts added by the open-ended question rarely exceeded 2% of the total. Weighted kappa statistics for quintile classifications were greater than 0.9. Similarly, asking white respondents about ethnic foods added little to nutrient estimates, and all correlations between estimates with and without the ethnic foods were at least 0.95. The effect of ethnic foods on nutrient means within the relevant ethnic group was more substantial, although most correlations between estimates with and without the added foods were still above 0.9. Conclusions: Open-ended food questions added little to nutrient estimates or rankings in any of the ethnic groups. Specific questions about ethnic foods were useful only within ethnic groups, for which they increased mean nutrient estimates and had modest impact on ranking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-221
Number of pages6
JournalEpidemiology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Food
Ethnic Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires
Women's Health
Hispanic Americans
Epidemiologic Studies
Cohort Studies
Diet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

On food frequency questionnaires : The contribution of open-ended questions and questions on ethnic foods. / Block, Gladys; Mandel, Rochelle; Gold, Ellen B.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 03.2004, p. 216-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6dba907739246d8a7a7846a48c1cb15,
title = "On food frequency questionnaires: The contribution of open-ended questions and questions on ethnic foods",
abstract = "Background: Epidemiologic studies of diet must balance the goal of comprehensiveness with that of minimizing subject and study burden. Information on the impact of certain additional questionnaire elements may aid in such decisions. Methods: We administered a food-frequency questionnaire in a large multiethnic cohort of women (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) in 1996-1997. Ancillary questionnaires asked about {"}any other foods you eat at least once a week{"} and about consumption of 8-16 ethnic foods included for respondents of Hispanic, Chinese, or Japanese ethnicity. We assessed the impact of these 2 ancillary questionnaires by examining the mean nutrient amount they contributed and their effects on rank-order correlations and categorizations of nutritional estimates. We examined the impact of ethnic foods both within the relevant ethnic group and among non-Hispanic whites. Results: Rank-order correlations (rs) between nutrient estimates with and without the open-ended question were 0.99 for almost all nutrients and all ethnic groups. Nutrient amounts added by the open-ended question rarely exceeded 2{\%} of the total. Weighted kappa statistics for quintile classifications were greater than 0.9. Similarly, asking white respondents about ethnic foods added little to nutrient estimates, and all correlations between estimates with and without the ethnic foods were at least 0.95. The effect of ethnic foods on nutrient means within the relevant ethnic group was more substantial, although most correlations between estimates with and without the added foods were still above 0.9. Conclusions: Open-ended food questions added little to nutrient estimates or rankings in any of the ethnic groups. Specific questions about ethnic foods were useful only within ethnic groups, for which they increased mean nutrient estimates and had modest impact on ranking.",
author = "Gladys Block and Rochelle Mandel and Gold, {Ellen B}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/01.ede.0000112144.77106.bf",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "216--221",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On food frequency questionnaires

T2 - The contribution of open-ended questions and questions on ethnic foods

AU - Block, Gladys

AU - Mandel, Rochelle

AU - Gold, Ellen B

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Background: Epidemiologic studies of diet must balance the goal of comprehensiveness with that of minimizing subject and study burden. Information on the impact of certain additional questionnaire elements may aid in such decisions. Methods: We administered a food-frequency questionnaire in a large multiethnic cohort of women (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) in 1996-1997. Ancillary questionnaires asked about "any other foods you eat at least once a week" and about consumption of 8-16 ethnic foods included for respondents of Hispanic, Chinese, or Japanese ethnicity. We assessed the impact of these 2 ancillary questionnaires by examining the mean nutrient amount they contributed and their effects on rank-order correlations and categorizations of nutritional estimates. We examined the impact of ethnic foods both within the relevant ethnic group and among non-Hispanic whites. Results: Rank-order correlations (rs) between nutrient estimates with and without the open-ended question were 0.99 for almost all nutrients and all ethnic groups. Nutrient amounts added by the open-ended question rarely exceeded 2% of the total. Weighted kappa statistics for quintile classifications were greater than 0.9. Similarly, asking white respondents about ethnic foods added little to nutrient estimates, and all correlations between estimates with and without the ethnic foods were at least 0.95. The effect of ethnic foods on nutrient means within the relevant ethnic group was more substantial, although most correlations between estimates with and without the added foods were still above 0.9. Conclusions: Open-ended food questions added little to nutrient estimates or rankings in any of the ethnic groups. Specific questions about ethnic foods were useful only within ethnic groups, for which they increased mean nutrient estimates and had modest impact on ranking.

AB - Background: Epidemiologic studies of diet must balance the goal of comprehensiveness with that of minimizing subject and study burden. Information on the impact of certain additional questionnaire elements may aid in such decisions. Methods: We administered a food-frequency questionnaire in a large multiethnic cohort of women (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) in 1996-1997. Ancillary questionnaires asked about "any other foods you eat at least once a week" and about consumption of 8-16 ethnic foods included for respondents of Hispanic, Chinese, or Japanese ethnicity. We assessed the impact of these 2 ancillary questionnaires by examining the mean nutrient amount they contributed and their effects on rank-order correlations and categorizations of nutritional estimates. We examined the impact of ethnic foods both within the relevant ethnic group and among non-Hispanic whites. Results: Rank-order correlations (rs) between nutrient estimates with and without the open-ended question were 0.99 for almost all nutrients and all ethnic groups. Nutrient amounts added by the open-ended question rarely exceeded 2% of the total. Weighted kappa statistics for quintile classifications were greater than 0.9. Similarly, asking white respondents about ethnic foods added little to nutrient estimates, and all correlations between estimates with and without the ethnic foods were at least 0.95. The effect of ethnic foods on nutrient means within the relevant ethnic group was more substantial, although most correlations between estimates with and without the added foods were still above 0.9. Conclusions: Open-ended food questions added little to nutrient estimates or rankings in any of the ethnic groups. Specific questions about ethnic foods were useful only within ethnic groups, for which they increased mean nutrient estimates and had modest impact on ranking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442609836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442609836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ede.0000112144.77106.bf

DO - 10.1097/01.ede.0000112144.77106.bf

M3 - Article

C2 - 15127915

AN - SCOPUS:2442609836

VL - 15

SP - 216

EP - 221

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 2

ER -