Nutritional assessment in preterm infants

I. Griffin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If the aim of nutritional assessment of preterm infants is to identify suboptimal (or excessive) provision of protein, energy and micronutrients, most currently available methods perform poorly. Assessment of body weight is limited by the confounding effect of fluid status especially in the first few days of life, and measurements of linear growth are relatively imprecise and slow to respond to nutritional changes. Growth assessment is hampered by the lack of an adequate reference standard. Comparisons to historical cohorts of preterm babies are inadequate. As most very low birth weight infants leave hospital below the 10th centile, use of these charts as 'standards' almost guarantees that preterm infants will have poor growth. Growth centiles based on data from newborn preterm infants have certain advantages. However, this is hardly normative data as preterm birth is always an abnormal event. Methods of assessing body composition are largely limited to the research setting, and it remains unclear whether the optimum composition of postnatal growth is one that mimics fetal growth or postnatal growth of the term infant. Biochemical nutritional assessments are of limited utility except in the highest-risk preterm infants, when nutritional inadequacy is likely (severe fluid restriction) or where intake is difficult to assess (use of human milk).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program
Pages177-188
Number of pages12
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameNestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program
Volume59
ISSN (Print)16616677
ISSN (Electronic)16623878

Fingerprint

Nutrition Assessment
nutrition assessment
Premature Infants
premature birth
low birth weight
reference standards
fetal development
infants
breast milk
Growth
body composition
neonates
body weight
energy
methodology
Very Low Birth Weight Infant
proteins
Micronutrients
Premature Birth
Human Milk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Griffin, I. (2007). Nutritional assessment in preterm infants. In Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program (Vol. 59, pp. 177-188). (Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program; Vol. 59). https://doi.org/10.1159/000098535

Nutritional assessment in preterm infants. / Griffin, I.

Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program. Vol. 59 2007. p. 177-188 (Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program; Vol. 59).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Griffin, I 2007, Nutritional assessment in preterm infants. in Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program. vol. 59, Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program, vol. 59, pp. 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000098535
Griffin I. Nutritional assessment in preterm infants. In Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program. Vol. 59. 2007. p. 177-188. (Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program). https://doi.org/10.1159/000098535
Griffin, I. / Nutritional assessment in preterm infants. Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program. Vol. 59 2007. pp. 177-188 (Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program).
@inproceedings{4914c958bcaa4dc5bffcbe225b867f70,
title = "Nutritional assessment in preterm infants",
abstract = "If the aim of nutritional assessment of preterm infants is to identify suboptimal (or excessive) provision of protein, energy and micronutrients, most currently available methods perform poorly. Assessment of body weight is limited by the confounding effect of fluid status especially in the first few days of life, and measurements of linear growth are relatively imprecise and slow to respond to nutritional changes. Growth assessment is hampered by the lack of an adequate reference standard. Comparisons to historical cohorts of preterm babies are inadequate. As most very low birth weight infants leave hospital below the 10th centile, use of these charts as 'standards' almost guarantees that preterm infants will have poor growth. Growth centiles based on data from newborn preterm infants have certain advantages. However, this is hardly normative data as preterm birth is always an abnormal event. Methods of assessing body composition are largely limited to the research setting, and it remains unclear whether the optimum composition of postnatal growth is one that mimics fetal growth or postnatal growth of the term infant. Biochemical nutritional assessments are of limited utility except in the highest-risk preterm infants, when nutritional inadequacy is likely (severe fluid restriction) or where intake is difficult to assess (use of human milk).",
author = "I. Griffin",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1159/000098535",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783805581943",
volume = "59",
series = "Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program",
pages = "177--188",
booktitle = "Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Nutritional assessment in preterm infants

AU - Griffin, I.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - If the aim of nutritional assessment of preterm infants is to identify suboptimal (or excessive) provision of protein, energy and micronutrients, most currently available methods perform poorly. Assessment of body weight is limited by the confounding effect of fluid status especially in the first few days of life, and measurements of linear growth are relatively imprecise and slow to respond to nutritional changes. Growth assessment is hampered by the lack of an adequate reference standard. Comparisons to historical cohorts of preterm babies are inadequate. As most very low birth weight infants leave hospital below the 10th centile, use of these charts as 'standards' almost guarantees that preterm infants will have poor growth. Growth centiles based on data from newborn preterm infants have certain advantages. However, this is hardly normative data as preterm birth is always an abnormal event. Methods of assessing body composition are largely limited to the research setting, and it remains unclear whether the optimum composition of postnatal growth is one that mimics fetal growth or postnatal growth of the term infant. Biochemical nutritional assessments are of limited utility except in the highest-risk preterm infants, when nutritional inadequacy is likely (severe fluid restriction) or where intake is difficult to assess (use of human milk).

AB - If the aim of nutritional assessment of preterm infants is to identify suboptimal (or excessive) provision of protein, energy and micronutrients, most currently available methods perform poorly. Assessment of body weight is limited by the confounding effect of fluid status especially in the first few days of life, and measurements of linear growth are relatively imprecise and slow to respond to nutritional changes. Growth assessment is hampered by the lack of an adequate reference standard. Comparisons to historical cohorts of preterm babies are inadequate. As most very low birth weight infants leave hospital below the 10th centile, use of these charts as 'standards' almost guarantees that preterm infants will have poor growth. Growth centiles based on data from newborn preterm infants have certain advantages. However, this is hardly normative data as preterm birth is always an abnormal event. Methods of assessing body composition are largely limited to the research setting, and it remains unclear whether the optimum composition of postnatal growth is one that mimics fetal growth or postnatal growth of the term infant. Biochemical nutritional assessments are of limited utility except in the highest-risk preterm infants, when nutritional inadequacy is likely (severe fluid restriction) or where intake is difficult to assess (use of human milk).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947715937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947715937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000098535

DO - 10.1159/000098535

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 17245099

AN - SCOPUS:33947715937

SN - 9783805581943

VL - 59

T3 - Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program

SP - 177

EP - 188

BT - Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series: Pediatric Program

ER -