Nursing Home Administrator Quality Improvement Self-Efficacy Scale

Elena O Siegel, Anna Zisberg, Debra Bakerjian, Leehu Zysberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Nursing home (NH) quality improvement (QI) is challenging. The critical role of NH leaders in successful QI is well established; however, current options for assessing the QI capabilities of leaders such as the licensed NH administrator are limited. PURPOSE:: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure NH administrator self-efficacy in QI. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH:: We used a mixed-methods cross-sectional design to develop and test the measure. For item generation, 39 NH leaders participated in qualitative interviews. Item reduction and content validity were established with a sample of eight subject matter experts. A random sample of 211 administrators from NHs with the lowest and highest Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality ratings completed the measure. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and tested the measure for internal reliability and convergent, discriminant, and known group validity. FINDINGS:: The final measure included five subscales and 32 items. Confirmatory factor analysis reaffirmed the factorial structure with good fit indices. The new measure’s subscales correlated with valid measures of self-efficacy and locus of control, supporting the measure’s convergent and discriminant validity. Significant differences in most of the subscales were found between the objective (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality rating) and subjective (Self-Rated Facility QI Index) quality outcomes, supporting the measure’s known group validity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: The instrument has usefulness to both NH organizations and individual NH administrators as a diagnostic tool to identify administrators with higher/lower chances of successfully implementing QI. Organizations and individuals can use this diagnostic to identify the administrator’s professional development needs for QI, in general, and specific to the instrument’s five subscales, informing directions for in-house training, mentoring, and outside professional development. Attending to NH administrators’ QI professional development needs prior to implementing QI holds promise to enhance the chances for successful implementation of QI, which is urgently needed in many NHs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Care Management Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 8 2016

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Quality Improvement
Nursing Homes
Administrative Personnel
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Statistical Factor Analysis
Self-efficacy
Quality improvement
Nursing homes
Organizations
Internal-External Control
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Nursing Home Administrator Quality Improvement Self-Efficacy Scale. / Siegel, Elena O; Zisberg, Anna; Bakerjian, Debra; Zysberg, Leehu.

In: Health Care Management Review, 08.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{32fe1d9a39df40bcbf25398ebc5c3ca1,
title = "Nursing Home Administrator Quality Improvement Self-Efficacy Scale",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Nursing home (NH) quality improvement (QI) is challenging. The critical role of NH leaders in successful QI is well established; however, current options for assessing the QI capabilities of leaders such as the licensed NH administrator are limited. PURPOSE:: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure NH administrator self-efficacy in QI. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH:: We used a mixed-methods cross-sectional design to develop and test the measure. For item generation, 39 NH leaders participated in qualitative interviews. Item reduction and content validity were established with a sample of eight subject matter experts. A random sample of 211 administrators from NHs with the lowest and highest Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality ratings completed the measure. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and tested the measure for internal reliability and convergent, discriminant, and known group validity. FINDINGS:: The final measure included five subscales and 32 items. Confirmatory factor analysis reaffirmed the factorial structure with good fit indices. The new measure’s subscales correlated with valid measures of self-efficacy and locus of control, supporting the measure’s convergent and discriminant validity. Significant differences in most of the subscales were found between the objective (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality rating) and subjective (Self-Rated Facility QI Index) quality outcomes, supporting the measure’s known group validity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: The instrument has usefulness to both NH organizations and individual NH administrators as a diagnostic tool to identify administrators with higher/lower chances of successfully implementing QI. Organizations and individuals can use this diagnostic to identify the administrator’s professional development needs for QI, in general, and specific to the instrument’s five subscales, informing directions for in-house training, mentoring, and outside professional development. Attending to NH administrators’ QI professional development needs prior to implementing QI holds promise to enhance the chances for successful implementation of QI, which is urgently needed in many NHs.",
author = "Siegel, {Elena O} and Anna Zisberg and Debra Bakerjian and Leehu Zysberg",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000111",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nursing Home Administrator Quality Improvement Self-Efficacy Scale

AU - Siegel, Elena O

AU - Zisberg, Anna

AU - Bakerjian, Debra

AU - Zysberg, Leehu

PY - 2016/6/8

Y1 - 2016/6/8

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Nursing home (NH) quality improvement (QI) is challenging. The critical role of NH leaders in successful QI is well established; however, current options for assessing the QI capabilities of leaders such as the licensed NH administrator are limited. PURPOSE:: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure NH administrator self-efficacy in QI. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH:: We used a mixed-methods cross-sectional design to develop and test the measure. For item generation, 39 NH leaders participated in qualitative interviews. Item reduction and content validity were established with a sample of eight subject matter experts. A random sample of 211 administrators from NHs with the lowest and highest Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality ratings completed the measure. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and tested the measure for internal reliability and convergent, discriminant, and known group validity. FINDINGS:: The final measure included five subscales and 32 items. Confirmatory factor analysis reaffirmed the factorial structure with good fit indices. The new measure’s subscales correlated with valid measures of self-efficacy and locus of control, supporting the measure’s convergent and discriminant validity. Significant differences in most of the subscales were found between the objective (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality rating) and subjective (Self-Rated Facility QI Index) quality outcomes, supporting the measure’s known group validity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: The instrument has usefulness to both NH organizations and individual NH administrators as a diagnostic tool to identify administrators with higher/lower chances of successfully implementing QI. Organizations and individuals can use this diagnostic to identify the administrator’s professional development needs for QI, in general, and specific to the instrument’s five subscales, informing directions for in-house training, mentoring, and outside professional development. Attending to NH administrators’ QI professional development needs prior to implementing QI holds promise to enhance the chances for successful implementation of QI, which is urgently needed in many NHs.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Nursing home (NH) quality improvement (QI) is challenging. The critical role of NH leaders in successful QI is well established; however, current options for assessing the QI capabilities of leaders such as the licensed NH administrator are limited. PURPOSE:: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure NH administrator self-efficacy in QI. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH:: We used a mixed-methods cross-sectional design to develop and test the measure. For item generation, 39 NH leaders participated in qualitative interviews. Item reduction and content validity were established with a sample of eight subject matter experts. A random sample of 211 administrators from NHs with the lowest and highest Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality ratings completed the measure. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and tested the measure for internal reliability and convergent, discriminant, and known group validity. FINDINGS:: The final measure included five subscales and 32 items. Confirmatory factor analysis reaffirmed the factorial structure with good fit indices. The new measure’s subscales correlated with valid measures of self-efficacy and locus of control, supporting the measure’s convergent and discriminant validity. Significant differences in most of the subscales were found between the objective (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality rating) and subjective (Self-Rated Facility QI Index) quality outcomes, supporting the measure’s known group validity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: The instrument has usefulness to both NH organizations and individual NH administrators as a diagnostic tool to identify administrators with higher/lower chances of successfully implementing QI. Organizations and individuals can use this diagnostic to identify the administrator’s professional development needs for QI, in general, and specific to the instrument’s five subscales, informing directions for in-house training, mentoring, and outside professional development. Attending to NH administrators’ QI professional development needs prior to implementing QI holds promise to enhance the chances for successful implementation of QI, which is urgently needed in many NHs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973571038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973571038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000111

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000111

M3 - Article

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

ER -