NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics

Lin Chen, John M Boone, Anita Nosratieh, Craig K. Abbey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital mammography is the current standard for breast cancer screening, however breast tomosynthesis and breast CT (bCT) have been studied in clinical trials. At our institution, 30 women (BIRADS 4 and 5) underwent IRB-approved imaging by mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and bCT on the same day. Twenty three data sets were used for analysis. The 2D noise power spectrum (NPS) was computed and averaged for each data set. The NPS was computed for different slice thicknesses of dx × N, where dx ≈ 0.3 mm and N=1-64, on the bCT data. Each 2D NPS was radially averaged, and the 1D data were fit using a power law function as proposed by Burgess: NPS(f) = αf. The value of β was determined over a range of frequencies corresponding to anatomical noise, for each patient and each modality. Averaged over the 30 women (26 for bCT, 28 for tomosynthesis, 28 for mammography), for mammography β=3.06 (0.25), for CC tomosynthesis β=2.91 (0.35), and for axial bCT β=1.72 (0.47). For sagittal bCT β=1.77 (0.36) and for coronal bCT, β=1.88 (0.45). The computation of β versus slice thickness on the coronal bCT data set led to β≈1.7 for N=1, asymptotically reaching β ≈ 3 for larger slice thickness. These results suggest that there is a fundamental difference in breast anatomic noise as characterized by β, between thin slices (<2 mm) and thicker slices. Tomosynthesis was found to have anatomic noise properties closer to mammography than breast CT, most likely due to the relatively thick slice sensitivity profile of tomosynthesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume7961
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
EventMedical Imaging 2011: Physics of Medical Imaging - Lake Buena Vista, FL, United States
Duration: Feb 13 2011Feb 17 2011

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 2011: Physics of Medical Imaging
CountryUnited States
CityLake Buena Vista, FL
Period2/13/112/17/11

Fingerprint

Mammography
noise spectra
Power spectrum
breast
Noise
power spectra
Breast
Screening
Imaging techniques
Research Ethics Committees
Early Detection of Cancer
screening

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • computed tomography
  • Mammography
  • tomosynthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Chen, L., Boone, J. M., Nosratieh, A., & Abbey, C. K. (2011). NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE (Vol. 7961). [79610F] https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878391

NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. / Chen, Lin; Boone, John M; Nosratieh, Anita; Abbey, Craig K.

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7961 2011. 79610F.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Chen, L, Boone, JM, Nosratieh, A & Abbey, CK 2011, NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. in Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. vol. 7961, 79610F, Medical Imaging 2011: Physics of Medical Imaging, Lake Buena Vista, FL, United States, 2/13/11. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878391
Chen L, Boone JM, Nosratieh A, Abbey CK. NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7961. 2011. 79610F https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878391
Chen, Lin ; Boone, John M ; Nosratieh, Anita ; Abbey, Craig K. / NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7961 2011.
@inproceedings{5e3ec54642c74c2c87733aada85b19c0,
title = "NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics",
abstract = "Digital mammography is the current standard for breast cancer screening, however breast tomosynthesis and breast CT (bCT) have been studied in clinical trials. At our institution, 30 women (BIRADS 4 and 5) underwent IRB-approved imaging by mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and bCT on the same day. Twenty three data sets were used for analysis. The 2D noise power spectrum (NPS) was computed and averaged for each data set. The NPS was computed for different slice thicknesses of dx × N, where dx ≈ 0.3 mm and N=1-64, on the bCT data. Each 2D NPS was radially averaged, and the 1D data were fit using a power law function as proposed by Burgess: NPS(f) = αf-β. The value of β was determined over a range of frequencies corresponding to anatomical noise, for each patient and each modality. Averaged over the 30 women (26 for bCT, 28 for tomosynthesis, 28 for mammography), for mammography β=3.06 (0.25), for CC tomosynthesis β=2.91 (0.35), and for axial bCT β=1.72 (0.47). For sagittal bCT β=1.77 (0.36) and for coronal bCT, β=1.88 (0.45). The computation of β versus slice thickness on the coronal bCT data set led to β≈1.7 for N=1, asymptotically reaching β ≈ 3 for larger slice thickness. These results suggest that there is a fundamental difference in breast anatomic noise as characterized by β, between thin slices (<2 mm) and thicker slices. Tomosynthesis was found to have anatomic noise properties closer to mammography than breast CT, most likely due to the relatively thick slice sensitivity profile of tomosynthesis.",
keywords = "breast cancer, computed tomography, Mammography, tomosynthesis",
author = "Lin Chen and Boone, {John M} and Anita Nosratieh and Abbey, {Craig K.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1117/12.878391",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780819485038",
volume = "7961",
booktitle = "Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics

AU - Chen, Lin

AU - Boone, John M

AU - Nosratieh, Anita

AU - Abbey, Craig K.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Digital mammography is the current standard for breast cancer screening, however breast tomosynthesis and breast CT (bCT) have been studied in clinical trials. At our institution, 30 women (BIRADS 4 and 5) underwent IRB-approved imaging by mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and bCT on the same day. Twenty three data sets were used for analysis. The 2D noise power spectrum (NPS) was computed and averaged for each data set. The NPS was computed for different slice thicknesses of dx × N, where dx ≈ 0.3 mm and N=1-64, on the bCT data. Each 2D NPS was radially averaged, and the 1D data were fit using a power law function as proposed by Burgess: NPS(f) = αf-β. The value of β was determined over a range of frequencies corresponding to anatomical noise, for each patient and each modality. Averaged over the 30 women (26 for bCT, 28 for tomosynthesis, 28 for mammography), for mammography β=3.06 (0.25), for CC tomosynthesis β=2.91 (0.35), and for axial bCT β=1.72 (0.47). For sagittal bCT β=1.77 (0.36) and for coronal bCT, β=1.88 (0.45). The computation of β versus slice thickness on the coronal bCT data set led to β≈1.7 for N=1, asymptotically reaching β ≈ 3 for larger slice thickness. These results suggest that there is a fundamental difference in breast anatomic noise as characterized by β, between thin slices (<2 mm) and thicker slices. Tomosynthesis was found to have anatomic noise properties closer to mammography than breast CT, most likely due to the relatively thick slice sensitivity profile of tomosynthesis.

AB - Digital mammography is the current standard for breast cancer screening, however breast tomosynthesis and breast CT (bCT) have been studied in clinical trials. At our institution, 30 women (BIRADS 4 and 5) underwent IRB-approved imaging by mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and bCT on the same day. Twenty three data sets were used for analysis. The 2D noise power spectrum (NPS) was computed and averaged for each data set. The NPS was computed for different slice thicknesses of dx × N, where dx ≈ 0.3 mm and N=1-64, on the bCT data. Each 2D NPS was radially averaged, and the 1D data were fit using a power law function as proposed by Burgess: NPS(f) = αf-β. The value of β was determined over a range of frequencies corresponding to anatomical noise, for each patient and each modality. Averaged over the 30 women (26 for bCT, 28 for tomosynthesis, 28 for mammography), for mammography β=3.06 (0.25), for CC tomosynthesis β=2.91 (0.35), and for axial bCT β=1.72 (0.47). For sagittal bCT β=1.77 (0.36) and for coronal bCT, β=1.88 (0.45). The computation of β versus slice thickness on the coronal bCT data set led to β≈1.7 for N=1, asymptotically reaching β ≈ 3 for larger slice thickness. These results suggest that there is a fundamental difference in breast anatomic noise as characterized by β, between thin slices (<2 mm) and thicker slices. Tomosynthesis was found to have anatomic noise properties closer to mammography than breast CT, most likely due to the relatively thick slice sensitivity profile of tomosynthesis.

KW - breast cancer

KW - computed tomography

KW - Mammography

KW - tomosynthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955786240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955786240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.878391

DO - 10.1117/12.878391

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79955786240

SN - 9780819485038

VL - 7961

BT - Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

ER -