Novel, anatomically appropriate balloon dilation technique of the glottis to treat posterior glottic stenosis in a 3D-printed model

Daniel Cates, Michael J. Magnetta, Libby J. Smith, Clark A. Rosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) often requires a destructive surgical treatment. Early PGS treatment involves glottic dilation to reduce airway constriction associated with chronic PGS. Round laryngeal dilation may not optimize posterior glottic dilation due to the teardrop shape of the glottis and may injure vocal fold tissue. We compared pressure applied to the glottis during traditional single balloon dilation and a novel, anatomically appropriate dilation technique (teardrop-shaped glottic dilation [TSGD]). Methods: Pressure sensors were affixed at various points on a three-dimensional printed glottic model. The anterior glottis was stented with a triangular stent (18-32F) in combination with balloon dilator (10–20 mm) placed in the posterior glottis (TSGD) in 30 unique combinations. Force applied to the vocal folds (VF) and posterior commissure (PC) during round balloon dilation and TSGD was measured. Results: Dilatory force in the PC ranged from 0.0–3.8 newtons (N) using balloon dilators and 0.0–17.5 N using TSGD. The TSGD technique yielded a superior ratio of force applied to the PC versus VF (P = 0.0296) compared to round balloon dilation alone. Optimal targeting of the PC occurred when the sum of the anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the stent and balloon dilator approached the AP length of the glottis. Conclusion: Use of an anatomically appropriate glottic dilation maximizes expansive force applied to the posterior commissure and decreased force to the vocal folds. This study demonstrates that TSGD minimizes force to the anterior glottis and maximizes dilation of the posterior glottis. This technique may play a role in preventing laryngeal stenosis associated with chronic PGS. Level of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 2019.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glottis
Tongue
Dilatation
Pathologic Constriction
Vocal Cords
Stents
Laryngostenosis
Laryngoscopes
Pressure

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • balloon dilation
  • laryngeal stenosis
  • PGS
  • Posterior glottic stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Novel, anatomically appropriate balloon dilation technique of the glottis to treat posterior glottic stenosis in a 3D-printed model. / Cates, Daniel; Magnetta, Michael J.; Smith, Libby J.; Rosen, Clark A.

In: Laryngoscope, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{633688f26d7343a49a0489fc9b3d9e9c,
title = "Novel, anatomically appropriate balloon dilation technique of the glottis to treat posterior glottic stenosis in a 3D-printed model",
abstract = "Objective: Posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) often requires a destructive surgical treatment. Early PGS treatment involves glottic dilation to reduce airway constriction associated with chronic PGS. Round laryngeal dilation may not optimize posterior glottic dilation due to the teardrop shape of the glottis and may injure vocal fold tissue. We compared pressure applied to the glottis during traditional single balloon dilation and a novel, anatomically appropriate dilation technique (teardrop-shaped glottic dilation [TSGD]). Methods: Pressure sensors were affixed at various points on a three-dimensional printed glottic model. The anterior glottis was stented with a triangular stent (18-32F) in combination with balloon dilator (10–20 mm) placed in the posterior glottis (TSGD) in 30 unique combinations. Force applied to the vocal folds (VF) and posterior commissure (PC) during round balloon dilation and TSGD was measured. Results: Dilatory force in the PC ranged from 0.0–3.8 newtons (N) using balloon dilators and 0.0–17.5 N using TSGD. The TSGD technique yielded a superior ratio of force applied to the PC versus VF (P = 0.0296) compared to round balloon dilation alone. Optimal targeting of the PC occurred when the sum of the anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the stent and balloon dilator approached the AP length of the glottis. Conclusion: Use of an anatomically appropriate glottic dilation maximizes expansive force applied to the posterior commissure and decreased force to the vocal folds. This study demonstrates that TSGD minimizes force to the anterior glottis and maximizes dilation of the posterior glottis. This technique may play a role in preventing laryngeal stenosis associated with chronic PGS. Level of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 2019.",
keywords = "3D printing, balloon dilation, laryngeal stenosis, PGS, Posterior glottic stenosis",
author = "Daniel Cates and Magnetta, {Michael J.} and Smith, {Libby J.} and Rosen, {Clark A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.27524",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novel, anatomically appropriate balloon dilation technique of the glottis to treat posterior glottic stenosis in a 3D-printed model

AU - Cates, Daniel

AU - Magnetta, Michael J.

AU - Smith, Libby J.

AU - Rosen, Clark A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) often requires a destructive surgical treatment. Early PGS treatment involves glottic dilation to reduce airway constriction associated with chronic PGS. Round laryngeal dilation may not optimize posterior glottic dilation due to the teardrop shape of the glottis and may injure vocal fold tissue. We compared pressure applied to the glottis during traditional single balloon dilation and a novel, anatomically appropriate dilation technique (teardrop-shaped glottic dilation [TSGD]). Methods: Pressure sensors were affixed at various points on a three-dimensional printed glottic model. The anterior glottis was stented with a triangular stent (18-32F) in combination with balloon dilator (10–20 mm) placed in the posterior glottis (TSGD) in 30 unique combinations. Force applied to the vocal folds (VF) and posterior commissure (PC) during round balloon dilation and TSGD was measured. Results: Dilatory force in the PC ranged from 0.0–3.8 newtons (N) using balloon dilators and 0.0–17.5 N using TSGD. The TSGD technique yielded a superior ratio of force applied to the PC versus VF (P = 0.0296) compared to round balloon dilation alone. Optimal targeting of the PC occurred when the sum of the anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the stent and balloon dilator approached the AP length of the glottis. Conclusion: Use of an anatomically appropriate glottic dilation maximizes expansive force applied to the posterior commissure and decreased force to the vocal folds. This study demonstrates that TSGD minimizes force to the anterior glottis and maximizes dilation of the posterior glottis. This technique may play a role in preventing laryngeal stenosis associated with chronic PGS. Level of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 2019.

AB - Objective: Posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) often requires a destructive surgical treatment. Early PGS treatment involves glottic dilation to reduce airway constriction associated with chronic PGS. Round laryngeal dilation may not optimize posterior glottic dilation due to the teardrop shape of the glottis and may injure vocal fold tissue. We compared pressure applied to the glottis during traditional single balloon dilation and a novel, anatomically appropriate dilation technique (teardrop-shaped glottic dilation [TSGD]). Methods: Pressure sensors were affixed at various points on a three-dimensional printed glottic model. The anterior glottis was stented with a triangular stent (18-32F) in combination with balloon dilator (10–20 mm) placed in the posterior glottis (TSGD) in 30 unique combinations. Force applied to the vocal folds (VF) and posterior commissure (PC) during round balloon dilation and TSGD was measured. Results: Dilatory force in the PC ranged from 0.0–3.8 newtons (N) using balloon dilators and 0.0–17.5 N using TSGD. The TSGD technique yielded a superior ratio of force applied to the PC versus VF (P = 0.0296) compared to round balloon dilation alone. Optimal targeting of the PC occurred when the sum of the anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the stent and balloon dilator approached the AP length of the glottis. Conclusion: Use of an anatomically appropriate glottic dilation maximizes expansive force applied to the posterior commissure and decreased force to the vocal folds. This study demonstrates that TSGD minimizes force to the anterior glottis and maximizes dilation of the posterior glottis. This technique may play a role in preventing laryngeal stenosis associated with chronic PGS. Level of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 2019.

KW - 3D printing

KW - balloon dilation

KW - laryngeal stenosis

KW - PGS

KW - Posterior glottic stenosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061965940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061965940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.27524

DO - 10.1002/lary.27524

M3 - Article

C2 - 30776098

AN - SCOPUS:85061965940

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

ER -