Normal Performance of Fmr1 Mice on a Touchscreen Delayed Nonmatching to Position Working Memory Task

Prescott T. Leach, Jane Hayes, Michael Pride, Jill L Silverman, Jacqueline Crawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


Fragile X syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by mild-to-severe cognitive deficits. The complete absence of Fmr1 and its protein product in the mouse model of fragile X (Fmr1 KO) provides construct validity. A major conundrum in the field is the remarkably normal performance of Fmr1 mice on cognitive tests in most reports. One explanation may be insufficiently challenging cognitive testing procedures. Here we developed a delayed nonmatching to position touchscreen task to test the hypothesis that paradigms placing demands on working memory would reveal robust and replicable cognitive deficits in the Fmr1 KO mouse. We first tested Fmr1 KO mice (Fmr1) and their wild-type (WT) littermates in a simple visual discrimination task, followed by assessment of reversal learning. We then tested Fmr1 and WT mice in a new touchscreen nonmatch to position task and subsequently challenged their working memory abilities by adding delays, representing a higher cognitive load. The performance by Fmr1 KO mice was equal to WTs on both touchscreen tasks. Last, we replicated previous reports of normal performance by Fmr1 mice on Morris water maze spatial navigation and reversal. These results indicate that, while the Fmr1 mouse model effectively recapitulates many molecular and cellular aspects of fragile X syndrome, the cognitive profile of Fmr1 mice generally does not recapitulate the primary cognitive deficits in the human syndrome, even when diverse and challenging tasks are imposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016


  • cognition
  • fragile X
  • learning and memory
  • mouse model
  • touchscreen
  • working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Normal Performance of Fmr1 Mice on a Touchscreen Delayed Nonmatching to Position Working Memory Task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this