Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries: A review

Jessica E Draughon Moret, Daniel J. Sheridan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-254
Number of pages20
JournalPsychology, Health and Medicine
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Survivors
HIV
Developed Countries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • forensic nursing
  • HIV
  • nPEP
  • nPEP compliance
  • rape
  • SANE
  • sexual assault

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries : A review. / Draughon Moret, Jessica E; Sheridan, Daniel J.

In: Psychology, Health and Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 235-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{1facbf75a63842b3b274bf84362d07b6,
title = "Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries: A review",
abstract = "Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.",
keywords = "AIDS, forensic nursing, HIV, nPEP, nPEP compliance, rape, SANE, sexual assault",
author = "{Draughon Moret}, {Jessica E} and Sheridan, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13548506.2011.579984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "235--254",
journal = "Psychology, Health and Medicine",
issn = "1354-8506",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries

T2 - A review

AU - Draughon Moret, Jessica E

AU - Sheridan, Daniel J.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.

AB - Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.

KW - AIDS

KW - forensic nursing

KW - HIV

KW - nPEP

KW - nPEP compliance

KW - rape

KW - SANE

KW - sexual assault

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860737736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860737736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13548506.2011.579984

DO - 10.1080/13548506.2011.579984

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22372741

AN - SCOPUS:84860737736

VL - 17

SP - 235

EP - 254

JO - Psychology, Health and Medicine

JF - Psychology, Health and Medicine

SN - 1354-8506

IS - 2

ER -