Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector

A method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications

Kai Yang, Shih Ying Huang, Nathan J. Packard, John M Boone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A simplified linear model approach was proposed to accurately model the response of a flat panel detector used for breast CT (bCT). Methods: Individual detector pixel mean and variance were measured from bCT projection images acquired both in air and with a polyethylene cylinder, with the detector operating in both fixed low gain and dynamic gain mode. Once the coefficients of the linear model are determined, the fractional additive noise can be used as a quantitative metric to evaluate the system's efficiency in utilizing x-ray photons, including the performance of different gain modes of the detector. Results: Fractional additive noise increases as the object thickness increases or as the radiation dose to the detector decreases. For bCT scan techniques on the UC Davis prototype scanner (80 kVp, 500 views total, 30 frames/s), in the low gain mode, additive noise contributes 21% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 44% for a 17 cm object. With the dynamic gain mode, additive noise only represents approximately 2.6% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 7.3% for a 17 cm object. Conclusions: The existence of the signal-independent additive noise is the primary cause for a quadratic relationship between bCT noise variance and the inverse of radiation dose at the detector. With the knowledge of the additive noise contribution to experimentally acquired images, system modifications can be made to reduce the impact of additive noise and improve the quantum noise efficiency of the bCT system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3527-3537
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Physics
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Noise
Analysis of Variance
Breast
X-Rays
Linear Models
Radiation
Polyethylene
Photons
Air

Keywords

  • additive noise
  • computerized tomography (CT)
  • cone-beam
  • flat panel detector
  • noise variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector : A method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications. / Yang, Kai; Huang, Shih Ying; Packard, Nathan J.; Boone, John M.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 3527-3537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9836620313ad49859e82771f4fd09d19,
title = "Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector: A method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications",
abstract = "Purpose: A simplified linear model approach was proposed to accurately model the response of a flat panel detector used for breast CT (bCT). Methods: Individual detector pixel mean and variance were measured from bCT projection images acquired both in air and with a polyethylene cylinder, with the detector operating in both fixed low gain and dynamic gain mode. Once the coefficients of the linear model are determined, the fractional additive noise can be used as a quantitative metric to evaluate the system's efficiency in utilizing x-ray photons, including the performance of different gain modes of the detector. Results: Fractional additive noise increases as the object thickness increases or as the radiation dose to the detector decreases. For bCT scan techniques on the UC Davis prototype scanner (80 kVp, 500 views total, 30 frames/s), in the low gain mode, additive noise contributes 21{\%} of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 44{\%} for a 17 cm object. With the dynamic gain mode, additive noise only represents approximately 2.6{\%} of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 7.3{\%} for a 17 cm object. Conclusions: The existence of the signal-independent additive noise is the primary cause for a quadratic relationship between bCT noise variance and the inverse of radiation dose at the detector. With the knowledge of the additive noise contribution to experimentally acquired images, system modifications can be made to reduce the impact of additive noise and improve the quantum noise efficiency of the bCT system.",
keywords = "additive noise, computerized tomography (CT), cone-beam, flat panel detector, noise variance",
author = "Kai Yang and Huang, {Shih Ying} and Packard, {Nathan J.} and Boone, {John M}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1118/1.3447720",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3527--3537",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector

T2 - A method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications

AU - Yang, Kai

AU - Huang, Shih Ying

AU - Packard, Nathan J.

AU - Boone, John M

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Purpose: A simplified linear model approach was proposed to accurately model the response of a flat panel detector used for breast CT (bCT). Methods: Individual detector pixel mean and variance were measured from bCT projection images acquired both in air and with a polyethylene cylinder, with the detector operating in both fixed low gain and dynamic gain mode. Once the coefficients of the linear model are determined, the fractional additive noise can be used as a quantitative metric to evaluate the system's efficiency in utilizing x-ray photons, including the performance of different gain modes of the detector. Results: Fractional additive noise increases as the object thickness increases or as the radiation dose to the detector decreases. For bCT scan techniques on the UC Davis prototype scanner (80 kVp, 500 views total, 30 frames/s), in the low gain mode, additive noise contributes 21% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 44% for a 17 cm object. With the dynamic gain mode, additive noise only represents approximately 2.6% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 7.3% for a 17 cm object. Conclusions: The existence of the signal-independent additive noise is the primary cause for a quadratic relationship between bCT noise variance and the inverse of radiation dose at the detector. With the knowledge of the additive noise contribution to experimentally acquired images, system modifications can be made to reduce the impact of additive noise and improve the quantum noise efficiency of the bCT system.

AB - Purpose: A simplified linear model approach was proposed to accurately model the response of a flat panel detector used for breast CT (bCT). Methods: Individual detector pixel mean and variance were measured from bCT projection images acquired both in air and with a polyethylene cylinder, with the detector operating in both fixed low gain and dynamic gain mode. Once the coefficients of the linear model are determined, the fractional additive noise can be used as a quantitative metric to evaluate the system's efficiency in utilizing x-ray photons, including the performance of different gain modes of the detector. Results: Fractional additive noise increases as the object thickness increases or as the radiation dose to the detector decreases. For bCT scan techniques on the UC Davis prototype scanner (80 kVp, 500 views total, 30 frames/s), in the low gain mode, additive noise contributes 21% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 44% for a 17 cm object. With the dynamic gain mode, additive noise only represents approximately 2.6% of the total pixel noise variance for a 10 cm object and 7.3% for a 17 cm object. Conclusions: The existence of the signal-independent additive noise is the primary cause for a quadratic relationship between bCT noise variance and the inverse of radiation dose at the detector. With the knowledge of the additive noise contribution to experimentally acquired images, system modifications can be made to reduce the impact of additive noise and improve the quantum noise efficiency of the bCT system.

KW - additive noise

KW - computerized tomography (CT)

KW - cone-beam

KW - flat panel detector

KW - noise variance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954751918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954751918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3447720

DO - 10.1118/1.3447720

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 3527

EP - 3537

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 7

ER -