Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation

Charan Ranganath, Ken A. Paller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results from recent neuroimaging studies have led to a controversy as to whether right or left prefrontal regions are relatively more important for episodic retrieval. To address this issue, we recorded event-related brain potentials during two recognition tests with identical stimuli but differing retrieval demands. In both tests, participants viewed a sequence of object drawings, half of which were identical to ones viewed earlier except for a change in size and half of which were new. Instructions were to discriminate between old and new objects (general test) or to additionally decide whether old objects were larger or smaller at study (specific test). Frontal brain potentials that were more positive during the specific than during the general test for both old and new objects were interpreted as neural correlates of the process by which specific attributes of test cues are compared with information retrieved from memory. Another ERP difference between the specific and general tests, which was observed for old objects only, had a left posterior scalp topography and was interpreted to reflect the reactivation of memories for studied objects. Frontal and posterior potentials thus reflected two memory processes important for accurate episodic retrieval. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both left and right prefrontal regions were engaged when demands to retrieve and evaluate perceptual information increased. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-222
Number of pages14
JournalCognitive Brain Research
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain
Scalp
Evoked Potentials
Neuroimaging
Cues
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Episodic memory
  • ERPs
  • Event-related potentials
  • Human memory
  • Prefrontal cortex
  • Recollection
  • Source monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. / Ranganath, Charan; Paller, Ken A.

In: Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 03.2000, p. 209-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ranganath, Charan ; Paller, Ken A. / Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. In: Cognitive Brain Research. 2000 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 209-222.
@article{c68226377aae406e8e6030f8478912fd,
title = "Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation",
abstract = "Results from recent neuroimaging studies have led to a controversy as to whether right or left prefrontal regions are relatively more important for episodic retrieval. To address this issue, we recorded event-related brain potentials during two recognition tests with identical stimuli but differing retrieval demands. In both tests, participants viewed a sequence of object drawings, half of which were identical to ones viewed earlier except for a change in size and half of which were new. Instructions were to discriminate between old and new objects (general test) or to additionally decide whether old objects were larger or smaller at study (specific test). Frontal brain potentials that were more positive during the specific than during the general test for both old and new objects were interpreted as neural correlates of the process by which specific attributes of test cues are compared with information retrieved from memory. Another ERP difference between the specific and general tests, which was observed for old objects only, had a left posterior scalp topography and was interpreted to reflect the reactivation of memories for studied objects. Frontal and posterior potentials thus reflected two memory processes important for accurate episodic retrieval. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both left and right prefrontal regions were engaged when demands to retrieve and evaluate perceptual information increased. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Episodic memory, ERPs, Event-related potentials, Human memory, Prefrontal cortex, Recollection, Source monitoring",
author = "Charan Ranganath and Paller, {Ken A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00048-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "209--222",
journal = "Cognitive Brain Research",
issn = "0926-6410",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation

AU - Ranganath, Charan

AU - Paller, Ken A.

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Results from recent neuroimaging studies have led to a controversy as to whether right or left prefrontal regions are relatively more important for episodic retrieval. To address this issue, we recorded event-related brain potentials during two recognition tests with identical stimuli but differing retrieval demands. In both tests, participants viewed a sequence of object drawings, half of which were identical to ones viewed earlier except for a change in size and half of which were new. Instructions were to discriminate between old and new objects (general test) or to additionally decide whether old objects were larger or smaller at study (specific test). Frontal brain potentials that were more positive during the specific than during the general test for both old and new objects were interpreted as neural correlates of the process by which specific attributes of test cues are compared with information retrieved from memory. Another ERP difference between the specific and general tests, which was observed for old objects only, had a left posterior scalp topography and was interpreted to reflect the reactivation of memories for studied objects. Frontal and posterior potentials thus reflected two memory processes important for accurate episodic retrieval. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both left and right prefrontal regions were engaged when demands to retrieve and evaluate perceptual information increased. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - Results from recent neuroimaging studies have led to a controversy as to whether right or left prefrontal regions are relatively more important for episodic retrieval. To address this issue, we recorded event-related brain potentials during two recognition tests with identical stimuli but differing retrieval demands. In both tests, participants viewed a sequence of object drawings, half of which were identical to ones viewed earlier except for a change in size and half of which were new. Instructions were to discriminate between old and new objects (general test) or to additionally decide whether old objects were larger or smaller at study (specific test). Frontal brain potentials that were more positive during the specific than during the general test for both old and new objects were interpreted as neural correlates of the process by which specific attributes of test cues are compared with information retrieved from memory. Another ERP difference between the specific and general tests, which was observed for old objects only, had a left posterior scalp topography and was interpreted to reflect the reactivation of memories for studied objects. Frontal and posterior potentials thus reflected two memory processes important for accurate episodic retrieval. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both left and right prefrontal regions were engaged when demands to retrieve and evaluate perceptual information increased. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Episodic memory

KW - ERPs

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Human memory

KW - Prefrontal cortex

KW - Recollection

KW - Source monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034020307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034020307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00048-8

DO - 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00048-8

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 209

EP - 222

JO - Cognitive Brain Research

JF - Cognitive Brain Research

SN - 0926-6410

IS - 2

ER -