Navigating local smoke-free multi-unit housing policy adoption

Travis D. Satterlund, Jeanette Treiber, Diana L Cassady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

California state-funded local tobacco control projects have instituted smoke-free multi-unit housing (MUH) policy adoption campaigns in order to secure voluntary policy throughout the state. While landlords can legally prohibit smoking at MUH complexes in California, they often oppose such measures. The objective of this study was to analyze voluntary smoke-free policy campaigns of state-funded local projects by focusing on the challenges they faced. Specifically, we examined 40 local campaigns in California led by county health departments and community based organizations, focusing on the barriers the local projects often had to overcome to enact policy. Our results identify arguments and issues typically raised by MUH property landlords, including the notion of tenant smoker and privacy rights, potential negative effects of smoke-free policy, and issues concerning the enforcement of policy. Moreover, relationships between local project personnel and MUH management often soured, which sometimes derailed smoke-free policy campaigns altogether. Our findings provide agencies with insights from the MUH property landlord perspective that will serve to inform future campaign strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-47
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Drug Education
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

housing policy
Smoke
Smoke-Free Policy
campaign
landlord
housing
Privacy
nicotine
Tobacco
privacy
smoking
personnel
Smoking
Organizations
Health
health
management
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Navigating local smoke-free multi-unit housing policy adoption. / Satterlund, Travis D.; Treiber, Jeanette; Cassady, Diana L.

In: Journal of Drug Education, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 33-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Satterlund, Travis D. ; Treiber, Jeanette ; Cassady, Diana L. / Navigating local smoke-free multi-unit housing policy adoption. In: Journal of Drug Education. 2013 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 33-47.
@article{ff700fdfc7a24e4aad5f1ee9fed92574,
title = "Navigating local smoke-free multi-unit housing policy adoption",
abstract = "California state-funded local tobacco control projects have instituted smoke-free multi-unit housing (MUH) policy adoption campaigns in order to secure voluntary policy throughout the state. While landlords can legally prohibit smoking at MUH complexes in California, they often oppose such measures. The objective of this study was to analyze voluntary smoke-free policy campaigns of state-funded local projects by focusing on the challenges they faced. Specifically, we examined 40 local campaigns in California led by county health departments and community based organizations, focusing on the barriers the local projects often had to overcome to enact policy. Our results identify arguments and issues typically raised by MUH property landlords, including the notion of tenant smoker and privacy rights, potential negative effects of smoke-free policy, and issues concerning the enforcement of policy. Moreover, relationships between local project personnel and MUH management often soured, which sometimes derailed smoke-free policy campaigns altogether. Our findings provide agencies with insights from the MUH property landlord perspective that will serve to inform future campaign strategy.",
author = "Satterlund, {Travis D.} and Jeanette Treiber and Cassady, {Diana L}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2190/DE.43.1.c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "33--47",
journal = "Journal of Drug Education",
issn = "0047-2379",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating local smoke-free multi-unit housing policy adoption

AU - Satterlund, Travis D.

AU - Treiber, Jeanette

AU - Cassady, Diana L

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - California state-funded local tobacco control projects have instituted smoke-free multi-unit housing (MUH) policy adoption campaigns in order to secure voluntary policy throughout the state. While landlords can legally prohibit smoking at MUH complexes in California, they often oppose such measures. The objective of this study was to analyze voluntary smoke-free policy campaigns of state-funded local projects by focusing on the challenges they faced. Specifically, we examined 40 local campaigns in California led by county health departments and community based organizations, focusing on the barriers the local projects often had to overcome to enact policy. Our results identify arguments and issues typically raised by MUH property landlords, including the notion of tenant smoker and privacy rights, potential negative effects of smoke-free policy, and issues concerning the enforcement of policy. Moreover, relationships between local project personnel and MUH management often soured, which sometimes derailed smoke-free policy campaigns altogether. Our findings provide agencies with insights from the MUH property landlord perspective that will serve to inform future campaign strategy.

AB - California state-funded local tobacco control projects have instituted smoke-free multi-unit housing (MUH) policy adoption campaigns in order to secure voluntary policy throughout the state. While landlords can legally prohibit smoking at MUH complexes in California, they often oppose such measures. The objective of this study was to analyze voluntary smoke-free policy campaigns of state-funded local projects by focusing on the challenges they faced. Specifically, we examined 40 local campaigns in California led by county health departments and community based organizations, focusing on the barriers the local projects often had to overcome to enact policy. Our results identify arguments and issues typically raised by MUH property landlords, including the notion of tenant smoker and privacy rights, potential negative effects of smoke-free policy, and issues concerning the enforcement of policy. Moreover, relationships between local project personnel and MUH management often soured, which sometimes derailed smoke-free policy campaigns altogether. Our findings provide agencies with insights from the MUH property landlord perspective that will serve to inform future campaign strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896952531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896952531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/DE.43.1.c

DO - 10.2190/DE.43.1.c

M3 - Article

C2 - 24855882

AN - SCOPUS:84896952531

VL - 43

SP - 33

EP - 47

JO - Journal of Drug Education

JF - Journal of Drug Education

SN - 0047-2379

IS - 1

ER -