National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections

Leon Dunn, Joerg Lehmann, Jessica Lye, John Kenny, Tomas Kron, Andrew Alves, Andrew Cole, Jackson Zifodya, Ivan Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work presents the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service's (ACDS) findings of an investigation of systematic discrepancies between treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and measured audit doses. Specifically, a comparison between the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA) and other common dose-calculation algorithms in regions downstream (≥2. cm) from low-density material in anthropomorphic and slab phantom geometries is presented. Two measurement setups involving rectilinear slab-phantoms (ACDS Level II audit) and anthropomorphic geometries (ACDS Level III audit) were used in conjunction with ion chamber (planar 2D array and Farmer-type) measurements. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for a variety of cases, with and without the presence of inhomogeneities and beam-modifiers in 71 audits. Results demonstrate a systematic AAA underdose with an average discrepancy of 2.9 ± 1.2% when the AAA algorithm is implemented in regions distal from lung-tissue interfaces, when lateral beams are used with anthropomorphic phantoms. This systemic discrepancy was found for all Level III audits of facilities using the AAA algorithm. This discrepancy is not seen when identical measurements are compared for other common dose-calculation algorithms (average discrepancy -0.4 ± 1.7%), including the Acuros XB algorithm also available with the Eclipse TPS. For slab phantom geometries (Level II audits), with similar measurement points downstream from inhomogeneities this discrepancy is also not seen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-441
Number of pages7
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lungs
inhomogeneity
Lung
dosage
dosimeters
slabs
planning
geometry
low density materials
eclipses
ionization chambers
Ions
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Algorithm
  • Audit
  • Dose
  • Dosimetry
  • Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Dunn, L., Lehmann, J., Lye, J., Kenny, J., Kron, T., Alves, A., ... Williams, I. (2015). National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections. Physica Medica, 31(5), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.002

National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections. / Dunn, Leon; Lehmann, Joerg; Lye, Jessica; Kenny, John; Kron, Tomas; Alves, Andrew; Cole, Andrew; Zifodya, Jackson; Williams, Ivan.

In: Physica Medica, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.07.2015, p. 435-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunn, L, Lehmann, J, Lye, J, Kenny, J, Kron, T, Alves, A, Cole, A, Zifodya, J & Williams, I 2015, 'National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections', Physica Medica, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.002
Dunn, Leon ; Lehmann, Joerg ; Lye, Jessica ; Kenny, John ; Kron, Tomas ; Alves, Andrew ; Cole, Andrew ; Zifodya, Jackson ; Williams, Ivan. / National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections. In: Physica Medica. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 435-441.
@article{f8ba6d0311b047ec97aab146cfcf71d7,
title = "National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections",
abstract = "This work presents the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service's (ACDS) findings of an investigation of systematic discrepancies between treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and measured audit doses. Specifically, a comparison between the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA) and other common dose-calculation algorithms in regions downstream (≥2. cm) from low-density material in anthropomorphic and slab phantom geometries is presented. Two measurement setups involving rectilinear slab-phantoms (ACDS Level II audit) and anthropomorphic geometries (ACDS Level III audit) were used in conjunction with ion chamber (planar 2D array and Farmer-type) measurements. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for a variety of cases, with and without the presence of inhomogeneities and beam-modifiers in 71 audits. Results demonstrate a systematic AAA underdose with an average discrepancy of 2.9 ± 1.2{\%} when the AAA algorithm is implemented in regions distal from lung-tissue interfaces, when lateral beams are used with anthropomorphic phantoms. This systemic discrepancy was found for all Level III audits of facilities using the AAA algorithm. This discrepancy is not seen when identical measurements are compared for other common dose-calculation algorithms (average discrepancy -0.4 ± 1.7{\%}), including the Acuros XB algorithm also available with the Eclipse TPS. For slab phantom geometries (Level II audits), with similar measurement points downstream from inhomogeneities this discrepancy is also not seen.",
keywords = "Algorithm, Audit, Dose, Dosimetry, Radiotherapy",
author = "Leon Dunn and Joerg Lehmann and Jessica Lye and John Kenny and Tomas Kron and Andrew Alves and Andrew Cole and Jackson Zifodya and Ivan Williams",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "435--441",
journal = "Physica Medica",
issn = "1120-1797",
publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National dosimetric audit network finds discrepancies in AAA lung inhomogeneity corrections

AU - Dunn, Leon

AU - Lehmann, Joerg

AU - Lye, Jessica

AU - Kenny, John

AU - Kron, Tomas

AU - Alves, Andrew

AU - Cole, Andrew

AU - Zifodya, Jackson

AU - Williams, Ivan

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - This work presents the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service's (ACDS) findings of an investigation of systematic discrepancies between treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and measured audit doses. Specifically, a comparison between the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA) and other common dose-calculation algorithms in regions downstream (≥2. cm) from low-density material in anthropomorphic and slab phantom geometries is presented. Two measurement setups involving rectilinear slab-phantoms (ACDS Level II audit) and anthropomorphic geometries (ACDS Level III audit) were used in conjunction with ion chamber (planar 2D array and Farmer-type) measurements. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for a variety of cases, with and without the presence of inhomogeneities and beam-modifiers in 71 audits. Results demonstrate a systematic AAA underdose with an average discrepancy of 2.9 ± 1.2% when the AAA algorithm is implemented in regions distal from lung-tissue interfaces, when lateral beams are used with anthropomorphic phantoms. This systemic discrepancy was found for all Level III audits of facilities using the AAA algorithm. This discrepancy is not seen when identical measurements are compared for other common dose-calculation algorithms (average discrepancy -0.4 ± 1.7%), including the Acuros XB algorithm also available with the Eclipse TPS. For slab phantom geometries (Level II audits), with similar measurement points downstream from inhomogeneities this discrepancy is also not seen.

AB - This work presents the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service's (ACDS) findings of an investigation of systematic discrepancies between treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and measured audit doses. Specifically, a comparison between the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA) and other common dose-calculation algorithms in regions downstream (≥2. cm) from low-density material in anthropomorphic and slab phantom geometries is presented. Two measurement setups involving rectilinear slab-phantoms (ACDS Level II audit) and anthropomorphic geometries (ACDS Level III audit) were used in conjunction with ion chamber (planar 2D array and Farmer-type) measurements. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for a variety of cases, with and without the presence of inhomogeneities and beam-modifiers in 71 audits. Results demonstrate a systematic AAA underdose with an average discrepancy of 2.9 ± 1.2% when the AAA algorithm is implemented in regions distal from lung-tissue interfaces, when lateral beams are used with anthropomorphic phantoms. This systemic discrepancy was found for all Level III audits of facilities using the AAA algorithm. This discrepancy is not seen when identical measurements are compared for other common dose-calculation algorithms (average discrepancy -0.4 ± 1.7%), including the Acuros XB algorithm also available with the Eclipse TPS. For slab phantom geometries (Level II audits), with similar measurement points downstream from inhomogeneities this discrepancy is also not seen.

KW - Algorithm

KW - Audit

KW - Dose

KW - Dosimetry

KW - Radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930822456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930822456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 435

EP - 441

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

SN - 1120-1797

IS - 5

ER -