MRI has limited agreement with CT in the evaluation of vertebral fractures of the canine trauma patient

Aitor Gallastegui, Emma Davies, Allison Zwingenberger, Stephanie Nykamp, Mark Rishniw, Philippa J. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Complete assessment of vertebral trauma in dogs currently requires CT and MRI for evaluation of the osseous and soft tissue structures that contribute to vertebral stability. Some studies in people have suggested that MRI may be sensitive and specific at detecting vertebral fractures making this potentially a single modality that could be used in spinal trauma evaluation. This study aimed to assess the ability for observers to evaluate vertebral fractures using MRI when compared to CT, which was used as the reference standard. Twenty-nine dogs with previously diagnosed acute vertebral fractures and four dogs with no vertebral fracture that had undergone sequential CT and MRI were included into the study. One hundred twenty-eight vertebrae were evaluated for the presence of fractures. Imaging studies were read by two observers blinded to the history. While both observers had similarly high sensitivity and specificity for simple detection of any fractured vertebrae, interobserver agreement was only moderate (κ = 0.584). When evaluations were specifically limited to detection of structurally unstable fractured vertebrae both observers showed improved specificity and interobserver agreement became substantial (κ = 0.650). Complete agreement for exact fracture location between MRI and CT results was only achieved in 14.3-32.6% of fractured vertebra with up to 79% of fractures being missed in some vertebral structures. This suggests that although MRI may be able to detect the presence of fractured vertebrae, it is not able to replace CT for the complete evaluation of the traumatized spine and documentation of fracture morphology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVeterinary Radiology and Ultrasound
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

vertebrae
Canidae
Spine
dogs
Wounds and Injuries
Dogs
reference standards
spine (bones)
Documentation
image analysis
History
history
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • computed tomography
  • CT
  • interobserver agreement
  • sensitivity
  • specificity
  • spine fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

MRI has limited agreement with CT in the evaluation of vertebral fractures of the canine trauma patient. / Gallastegui, Aitor; Davies, Emma; Zwingenberger, Allison; Nykamp, Stephanie; Rishniw, Mark; Johnson, Philippa J.

In: Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e4f86f6e1f344a58fae0d346b2b5d34,
title = "MRI has limited agreement with CT in the evaluation of vertebral fractures of the canine trauma patient",
abstract = "Complete assessment of vertebral trauma in dogs currently requires CT and MRI for evaluation of the osseous and soft tissue structures that contribute to vertebral stability. Some studies in people have suggested that MRI may be sensitive and specific at detecting vertebral fractures making this potentially a single modality that could be used in spinal trauma evaluation. This study aimed to assess the ability for observers to evaluate vertebral fractures using MRI when compared to CT, which was used as the reference standard. Twenty-nine dogs with previously diagnosed acute vertebral fractures and four dogs with no vertebral fracture that had undergone sequential CT and MRI were included into the study. One hundred twenty-eight vertebrae were evaluated for the presence of fractures. Imaging studies were read by two observers blinded to the history. While both observers had similarly high sensitivity and specificity for simple detection of any fractured vertebrae, interobserver agreement was only moderate (κ = 0.584). When evaluations were specifically limited to detection of structurally unstable fractured vertebrae both observers showed improved specificity and interobserver agreement became substantial (κ = 0.650). Complete agreement for exact fracture location between MRI and CT results was only achieved in 14.3-32.6{\%} of fractured vertebra with up to 79{\%} of fractures being missed in some vertebral structures. This suggests that although MRI may be able to detect the presence of fractured vertebrae, it is not able to replace CT for the complete evaluation of the traumatized spine and documentation of fracture morphology.",
keywords = "accuracy, computed tomography, CT, interobserver agreement, sensitivity, specificity, spine fracture",
author = "Aitor Gallastegui and Emma Davies and Allison Zwingenberger and Stephanie Nykamp and Mark Rishniw and Johnson, {Philippa J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/vru.12785",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound",
issn = "1058-8183",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI has limited agreement with CT in the evaluation of vertebral fractures of the canine trauma patient

AU - Gallastegui, Aitor

AU - Davies, Emma

AU - Zwingenberger, Allison

AU - Nykamp, Stephanie

AU - Rishniw, Mark

AU - Johnson, Philippa J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Complete assessment of vertebral trauma in dogs currently requires CT and MRI for evaluation of the osseous and soft tissue structures that contribute to vertebral stability. Some studies in people have suggested that MRI may be sensitive and specific at detecting vertebral fractures making this potentially a single modality that could be used in spinal trauma evaluation. This study aimed to assess the ability for observers to evaluate vertebral fractures using MRI when compared to CT, which was used as the reference standard. Twenty-nine dogs with previously diagnosed acute vertebral fractures and four dogs with no vertebral fracture that had undergone sequential CT and MRI were included into the study. One hundred twenty-eight vertebrae were evaluated for the presence of fractures. Imaging studies were read by two observers blinded to the history. While both observers had similarly high sensitivity and specificity for simple detection of any fractured vertebrae, interobserver agreement was only moderate (κ = 0.584). When evaluations were specifically limited to detection of structurally unstable fractured vertebrae both observers showed improved specificity and interobserver agreement became substantial (κ = 0.650). Complete agreement for exact fracture location between MRI and CT results was only achieved in 14.3-32.6% of fractured vertebra with up to 79% of fractures being missed in some vertebral structures. This suggests that although MRI may be able to detect the presence of fractured vertebrae, it is not able to replace CT for the complete evaluation of the traumatized spine and documentation of fracture morphology.

AB - Complete assessment of vertebral trauma in dogs currently requires CT and MRI for evaluation of the osseous and soft tissue structures that contribute to vertebral stability. Some studies in people have suggested that MRI may be sensitive and specific at detecting vertebral fractures making this potentially a single modality that could be used in spinal trauma evaluation. This study aimed to assess the ability for observers to evaluate vertebral fractures using MRI when compared to CT, which was used as the reference standard. Twenty-nine dogs with previously diagnosed acute vertebral fractures and four dogs with no vertebral fracture that had undergone sequential CT and MRI were included into the study. One hundred twenty-eight vertebrae were evaluated for the presence of fractures. Imaging studies were read by two observers blinded to the history. While both observers had similarly high sensitivity and specificity for simple detection of any fractured vertebrae, interobserver agreement was only moderate (κ = 0.584). When evaluations were specifically limited to detection of structurally unstable fractured vertebrae both observers showed improved specificity and interobserver agreement became substantial (κ = 0.650). Complete agreement for exact fracture location between MRI and CT results was only achieved in 14.3-32.6% of fractured vertebra with up to 79% of fractures being missed in some vertebral structures. This suggests that although MRI may be able to detect the presence of fractured vertebrae, it is not able to replace CT for the complete evaluation of the traumatized spine and documentation of fracture morphology.

KW - accuracy

KW - computed tomography

KW - CT

KW - interobserver agreement

KW - sensitivity

KW - specificity

KW - spine fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069897631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069897631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vru.12785

DO - 10.1111/vru.12785

M3 - Article

C2 - 31309654

AN - SCOPUS:85069897631

JO - Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

JF - Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

SN - 1058-8183

ER -