MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: Meta-analysis and implications

Daniel J. Cher, Jennifer Conwell, Jack S. Mandel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting silicone breast implant rupture, and to explore implications of the use of MRI for screening and estimating the prevalence of rupture among asymptomatic women. The study consisted of a meta-analysis of published studies with the calculation of sensitivity and specificity as independent parameters, the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and other clinically important values such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Participants included women with breast implants who underwent both MRI and subsequent implant removal. Eighteen studies, performed primarily in academic settings, with approximately 1,039 women and 2,036 implants met entry criteria. Most studies involved women with symptomatic implants. Assuming that sensitivity and specificity were independent parameters, the summary sensitivity was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-83) and the summary specificity was 91% (95% CI, 86-94). Using ROC meta-analysis methodology, the odds ratio describing the overall accuracy of the test was 40.1 (range, 18.8-85.4). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies. Studies using breast coils, those with convenience samples, larger studies, and studies of lower report quality tended to report higher levels of accuracy. The quality of study reports was generally poor. Among symptomatic women, PPV was fairly high. Among lower prevalence populations, PPV appeared to be insufficient to warrant use as a screening tool. MRI is moderately accurate in detecting silicone breast implant rupture. However, MRI should remain a confirmatory diagnostic test and should not be used to screen asymptomatic women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-380
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast Implants
Silicones
Meta-Analysis
Rupture
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ROC Curve
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Breast
Odds Ratio
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture : Meta-analysis and implications. / Cher, Daniel J.; Conwell, Jennifer; Mandel, Jack S.

In: Annals of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 367-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd024e919b4347ea892d855a265f3dbe,
title = "MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: Meta-analysis and implications",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting silicone breast implant rupture, and to explore implications of the use of MRI for screening and estimating the prevalence of rupture among asymptomatic women. The study consisted of a meta-analysis of published studies with the calculation of sensitivity and specificity as independent parameters, the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and other clinically important values such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Participants included women with breast implants who underwent both MRI and subsequent implant removal. Eighteen studies, performed primarily in academic settings, with approximately 1,039 women and 2,036 implants met entry criteria. Most studies involved women with symptomatic implants. Assuming that sensitivity and specificity were independent parameters, the summary sensitivity was 78{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 71-83) and the summary specificity was 91{\%} (95{\%} CI, 86-94). Using ROC meta-analysis methodology, the odds ratio describing the overall accuracy of the test was 40.1 (range, 18.8-85.4). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies. Studies using breast coils, those with convenience samples, larger studies, and studies of lower report quality tended to report higher levels of accuracy. The quality of study reports was generally poor. Among symptomatic women, PPV was fairly high. Among lower prevalence populations, PPV appeared to be insufficient to warrant use as a screening tool. MRI is moderately accurate in detecting silicone breast implant rupture. However, MRI should remain a confirmatory diagnostic test and should not be used to screen asymptomatic women.",
author = "Cher, {Daniel J.} and Jennifer Conwell and Mandel, {Jack S.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000637-200110000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "367--380",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture

T2 - Meta-analysis and implications

AU - Cher, Daniel J.

AU - Conwell, Jennifer

AU - Mandel, Jack S.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting silicone breast implant rupture, and to explore implications of the use of MRI for screening and estimating the prevalence of rupture among asymptomatic women. The study consisted of a meta-analysis of published studies with the calculation of sensitivity and specificity as independent parameters, the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and other clinically important values such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Participants included women with breast implants who underwent both MRI and subsequent implant removal. Eighteen studies, performed primarily in academic settings, with approximately 1,039 women and 2,036 implants met entry criteria. Most studies involved women with symptomatic implants. Assuming that sensitivity and specificity were independent parameters, the summary sensitivity was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-83) and the summary specificity was 91% (95% CI, 86-94). Using ROC meta-analysis methodology, the odds ratio describing the overall accuracy of the test was 40.1 (range, 18.8-85.4). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies. Studies using breast coils, those with convenience samples, larger studies, and studies of lower report quality tended to report higher levels of accuracy. The quality of study reports was generally poor. Among symptomatic women, PPV was fairly high. Among lower prevalence populations, PPV appeared to be insufficient to warrant use as a screening tool. MRI is moderately accurate in detecting silicone breast implant rupture. However, MRI should remain a confirmatory diagnostic test and should not be used to screen asymptomatic women.

AB - The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting silicone breast implant rupture, and to explore implications of the use of MRI for screening and estimating the prevalence of rupture among asymptomatic women. The study consisted of a meta-analysis of published studies with the calculation of sensitivity and specificity as independent parameters, the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and other clinically important values such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. Participants included women with breast implants who underwent both MRI and subsequent implant removal. Eighteen studies, performed primarily in academic settings, with approximately 1,039 women and 2,036 implants met entry criteria. Most studies involved women with symptomatic implants. Assuming that sensitivity and specificity were independent parameters, the summary sensitivity was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-83) and the summary specificity was 91% (95% CI, 86-94). Using ROC meta-analysis methodology, the odds ratio describing the overall accuracy of the test was 40.1 (range, 18.8-85.4). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies. Studies using breast coils, those with convenience samples, larger studies, and studies of lower report quality tended to report higher levels of accuracy. The quality of study reports was generally poor. Among symptomatic women, PPV was fairly high. Among lower prevalence populations, PPV appeared to be insufficient to warrant use as a screening tool. MRI is moderately accurate in detecting silicone breast implant rupture. However, MRI should remain a confirmatory diagnostic test and should not be used to screen asymptomatic women.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034791076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034791076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000637-200110000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00000637-200110000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 11601570

AN - SCOPUS:0034791076

VL - 47

SP - 367

EP - 380

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 4

ER -