Moving forward through consensus

Protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology

Patricia Schneider, Nathan Evaniew, Juan Sebastian Rendon, Paula McKay, R Randall, Robert Turcotte, Roberto Vélez, Mohit Bhandari, Michelle Ghert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. Ethics and dissemination: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere011780
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Orthopedics
Research
Ethics
Research Ethics
Ontario
Canada
Publications
Research Design
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Moving forward through consensus : Protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. / Schneider, Patricia; Evaniew, Nathan; Rendon, Juan Sebastian; McKay, Paula; Randall, R; Turcotte, Robert; Vélez, Roberto; Bhandari, Mohit; Ghert, Michelle.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 5, e011780, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Schneider, Patricia ; Evaniew, Nathan ; Rendon, Juan Sebastian ; McKay, Paula ; Randall, R ; Turcotte, Robert ; Vélez, Roberto ; Bhandari, Mohit ; Ghert, Michelle. / Moving forward through consensus : Protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. In: BMJ Open. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 5.
@article{060ca57c566b486cac3e8aceec6da6f6,
title = "Moving forward through consensus: Protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology",
abstract = "Introduction: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. Ethics and dissemination: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.",
author = "Patricia Schneider and Nathan Evaniew and Rendon, {Juan Sebastian} and Paula McKay and R Randall and Robert Turcotte and Roberto V{\'e}lez and Mohit Bhandari and Michelle Ghert",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving forward through consensus

T2 - Protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology

AU - Schneider, Patricia

AU - Evaniew, Nathan

AU - Rendon, Juan Sebastian

AU - McKay, Paula

AU - Randall, R

AU - Turcotte, Robert

AU - Vélez, Roberto

AU - Bhandari, Mohit

AU - Ghert, Michelle

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. Ethics and dissemination: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

AB - Introduction: Orthopaedic oncology researchers face several obstacles in the design and execution of randomised controlled trials, including finite fiscal resources to support the rising costs of clinical research and insufficient patient volume at individual sites. As a result, high-quality research to guide clinical practice has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. A focused approach is imperative to design a research programme that is economical, streamlined and addresses clinically relevant endpoints. The primary objective of this study will be to use a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for international clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of anonymous web-based questionnaires (phases I and II), and an in-person consensus meeting (phase III). Participants will suggest research questions that they believe are of particular importance to the field (phase I), and individually rate each proposed question on 5 criteria (phase II). Research questions that meet predetermined consensus thresholds will be brought forward to the consensus meeting (phase III) for discussion by an expert panel. Following these discussions, the expert panel will be asked to assign scores for each research question, and research questions meeting predetermined criteria will be brought forward for final ranking. The expert panel will then be asked to rank the top 3 research questions, and these 3 research questions will be distributed to the initial group of participants for validation. Ethics and dissemination: An ethics application is currently under review with the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this initiative will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971290702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971290702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e011780

ER -