Morbidity in live liver donors: Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined

Christopher R. Shackleton, John M. Vierling, Nicholas Nissen, Paul Martin, Fred Poordad, Tram Tran, Steven D Colquhoun, Ronaldw Busuttil

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: The true extent of morbidity among live liver donors remains poorly understood. In this unique and often high-profile area of surgery, the development of standards for defining and reporting complications would foster a better understanding of the incidence and magnitude of such adverse events (AEs). Design: Retrospective review of AEs among live liver donors. Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients and Methods: Of 202 individuals undergoing evaluation for live liver donation, 42 (20.8%) proceeded to surgery. Thirty-four underwent a right lobectomy without the middle hepatic vein; 3, a left lateral segmentectomy. Any event causing a deviation from a patient's ideal course was considered an AE and subsequently classified according to a derived framework. Morbidity was defined as 1 or more AEs. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, timing, type, severity, and impact of AEs. Results: No deaths or significant hepatic dysfunction occurred. In 5 (12%) of the 42 donors, the hepatectomy was aborted for anatomic reasons before parenchymal transection. Eight (22%) of the remaining 37 experienced 11 AEs, of which 10 completely resolved, whereas 1 AE (3%) resulted in a permanent disability (brachial plexopathy). The overall incidence of AEs was 0.30 per case. Ten (91%) of the 11 AEs presented within the first postoperative month. Conclusions: Most live liver donations are uncomplicated or do not lead to permanent consequence. The adoption of a standards-based classification framework for AEs in live liver donors would allow for an inclusive, consistent, and universally applicable method to collect, analyze, and report donor morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)888-895
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume140
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Liver
Incidence
Brachial Plexus Neuropathies
Hepatic Veins
Segmental Mastectomy
Hepatectomy
Teaching Hospitals
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Shackleton, C. R., Vierling, J. M., Nissen, N., Martin, P., Poordad, F., Tran, T., ... Busuttil, R. (2005). Morbidity in live liver donors: Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined. Archives of Surgery, 140(9), 888-895. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888

Morbidity in live liver donors : Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined. / Shackleton, Christopher R.; Vierling, John M.; Nissen, Nicholas; Martin, Paul; Poordad, Fred; Tran, Tram; Colquhoun, Steven D; Busuttil, Ronaldw.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 9, 01.09.2005, p. 888-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Shackleton, CR, Vierling, JM, Nissen, N, Martin, P, Poordad, F, Tran, T, Colquhoun, SD & Busuttil, R 2005, 'Morbidity in live liver donors: Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined', Archives of Surgery, vol. 140, no. 9, pp. 888-895. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888
Shackleton CR, Vierling JM, Nissen N, Martin P, Poordad F, Tran T et al. Morbidity in live liver donors: Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined. Archives of Surgery. 2005 Sep 1;140(9):888-895. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888
Shackleton, Christopher R. ; Vierling, John M. ; Nissen, Nicholas ; Martin, Paul ; Poordad, Fred ; Tran, Tram ; Colquhoun, Steven D ; Busuttil, Ronaldw. / Morbidity in live liver donors : Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined. In: Archives of Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 140, No. 9. pp. 888-895.
@article{47279307f7d74787a4ac92a0503bac41,
title = "Morbidity in live liver donors: Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined",
abstract = "Hypothesis: The true extent of morbidity among live liver donors remains poorly understood. In this unique and often high-profile area of surgery, the development of standards for defining and reporting complications would foster a better understanding of the incidence and magnitude of such adverse events (AEs). Design: Retrospective review of AEs among live liver donors. Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients and Methods: Of 202 individuals undergoing evaluation for live liver donation, 42 (20.8{\%}) proceeded to surgery. Thirty-four underwent a right lobectomy without the middle hepatic vein; 3, a left lateral segmentectomy. Any event causing a deviation from a patient's ideal course was considered an AE and subsequently classified according to a derived framework. Morbidity was defined as 1 or more AEs. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, timing, type, severity, and impact of AEs. Results: No deaths or significant hepatic dysfunction occurred. In 5 (12{\%}) of the 42 donors, the hepatectomy was aborted for anatomic reasons before parenchymal transection. Eight (22{\%}) of the remaining 37 experienced 11 AEs, of which 10 completely resolved, whereas 1 AE (3{\%}) resulted in a permanent disability (brachial plexopathy). The overall incidence of AEs was 0.30 per case. Ten (91{\%}) of the 11 AEs presented within the first postoperative month. Conclusions: Most live liver donations are uncomplicated or do not lead to permanent consequence. The adoption of a standards-based classification framework for AEs in live liver donors would allow for an inclusive, consistent, and universally applicable method to collect, analyze, and report donor morbidity.",
author = "Shackleton, {Christopher R.} and Vierling, {John M.} and Nicholas Nissen and Paul Martin and Fred Poordad and Tram Tran and Colquhoun, {Steven D} and Ronaldw Busuttil",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "888--895",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morbidity in live liver donors

T2 - Standards-based adverse event reporting further refined

AU - Shackleton, Christopher R.

AU - Vierling, John M.

AU - Nissen, Nicholas

AU - Martin, Paul

AU - Poordad, Fred

AU - Tran, Tram

AU - Colquhoun, Steven D

AU - Busuttil, Ronaldw

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - Hypothesis: The true extent of morbidity among live liver donors remains poorly understood. In this unique and often high-profile area of surgery, the development of standards for defining and reporting complications would foster a better understanding of the incidence and magnitude of such adverse events (AEs). Design: Retrospective review of AEs among live liver donors. Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients and Methods: Of 202 individuals undergoing evaluation for live liver donation, 42 (20.8%) proceeded to surgery. Thirty-four underwent a right lobectomy without the middle hepatic vein; 3, a left lateral segmentectomy. Any event causing a deviation from a patient's ideal course was considered an AE and subsequently classified according to a derived framework. Morbidity was defined as 1 or more AEs. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, timing, type, severity, and impact of AEs. Results: No deaths or significant hepatic dysfunction occurred. In 5 (12%) of the 42 donors, the hepatectomy was aborted for anatomic reasons before parenchymal transection. Eight (22%) of the remaining 37 experienced 11 AEs, of which 10 completely resolved, whereas 1 AE (3%) resulted in a permanent disability (brachial plexopathy). The overall incidence of AEs was 0.30 per case. Ten (91%) of the 11 AEs presented within the first postoperative month. Conclusions: Most live liver donations are uncomplicated or do not lead to permanent consequence. The adoption of a standards-based classification framework for AEs in live liver donors would allow for an inclusive, consistent, and universally applicable method to collect, analyze, and report donor morbidity.

AB - Hypothesis: The true extent of morbidity among live liver donors remains poorly understood. In this unique and often high-profile area of surgery, the development of standards for defining and reporting complications would foster a better understanding of the incidence and magnitude of such adverse events (AEs). Design: Retrospective review of AEs among live liver donors. Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients and Methods: Of 202 individuals undergoing evaluation for live liver donation, 42 (20.8%) proceeded to surgery. Thirty-four underwent a right lobectomy without the middle hepatic vein; 3, a left lateral segmentectomy. Any event causing a deviation from a patient's ideal course was considered an AE and subsequently classified according to a derived framework. Morbidity was defined as 1 or more AEs. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, timing, type, severity, and impact of AEs. Results: No deaths or significant hepatic dysfunction occurred. In 5 (12%) of the 42 donors, the hepatectomy was aborted for anatomic reasons before parenchymal transection. Eight (22%) of the remaining 37 experienced 11 AEs, of which 10 completely resolved, whereas 1 AE (3%) resulted in a permanent disability (brachial plexopathy). The overall incidence of AEs was 0.30 per case. Ten (91%) of the 11 AEs presented within the first postoperative month. Conclusions: Most live liver donations are uncomplicated or do not lead to permanent consequence. The adoption of a standards-based classification framework for AEs in live liver donors would allow for an inclusive, consistent, and universally applicable method to collect, analyze, and report donor morbidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144512025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144512025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.888

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16172298

AN - SCOPUS:25144512025

VL - 140

SP - 888

EP - 895

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -