Moral lessons from the jury box

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A decade ago a North Carolina jury awarded millions of dollars in damages because of a healthcare institution's failure to provide appropriate pain relief to a dying patient. In 2001, a California jury found a physician guilty of elder abuse for his failure to properly manage the pain of a cancer patient. In both instances, state licensing boards had failed to take any disciplinary action against those involved. These cases dramatically illustrate a significant and persistent gulf between the lay public and the health professions with regard to the moral significance they attach to the duty to relieve suffering. Measures to insure that all patients receive effective assessment and management of their pain must take into account this disparity, and endeavor to achieve congruence by reconnecting the health professions to their ancient and core value-the relief of suffering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-92
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Health Occupations
Psychological Stress
Elder Abuse
Pain Management
Licensure
Public Health
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Pain
Cancer Pain

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Controlled substances
  • Damages
  • Ethics
  • Law
  • Liability
  • Management
  • Narcotics
  • Pain
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Moral lessons from the jury box. / Rich, Ben A.

In: Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, p. 81-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c5403385ecb4fd886104e658149dc3a,
title = "Moral lessons from the jury box",
abstract = "A decade ago a North Carolina jury awarded millions of dollars in damages because of a healthcare institution's failure to provide appropriate pain relief to a dying patient. In 2001, a California jury found a physician guilty of elder abuse for his failure to properly manage the pain of a cancer patient. In both instances, state licensing boards had failed to take any disciplinary action against those involved. These cases dramatically illustrate a significant and persistent gulf between the lay public and the health professions with regard to the moral significance they attach to the duty to relieve suffering. Measures to insure that all patients receive effective assessment and management of their pain must take into account this disparity, and endeavor to achieve congruence by reconnecting the health professions to their ancient and core value-the relief of suffering.",
keywords = "Assessment, Controlled substances, Damages, Ethics, Law, Liability, Management, Narcotics, Pain, Standards",
author = "Rich, {Ben A}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1300/J354v16n01_06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "81--92",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy",
issn = "1536-0288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral lessons from the jury box

AU - Rich, Ben A

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - A decade ago a North Carolina jury awarded millions of dollars in damages because of a healthcare institution's failure to provide appropriate pain relief to a dying patient. In 2001, a California jury found a physician guilty of elder abuse for his failure to properly manage the pain of a cancer patient. In both instances, state licensing boards had failed to take any disciplinary action against those involved. These cases dramatically illustrate a significant and persistent gulf between the lay public and the health professions with regard to the moral significance they attach to the duty to relieve suffering. Measures to insure that all patients receive effective assessment and management of their pain must take into account this disparity, and endeavor to achieve congruence by reconnecting the health professions to their ancient and core value-the relief of suffering.

AB - A decade ago a North Carolina jury awarded millions of dollars in damages because of a healthcare institution's failure to provide appropriate pain relief to a dying patient. In 2001, a California jury found a physician guilty of elder abuse for his failure to properly manage the pain of a cancer patient. In both instances, state licensing boards had failed to take any disciplinary action against those involved. These cases dramatically illustrate a significant and persistent gulf between the lay public and the health professions with regard to the moral significance they attach to the duty to relieve suffering. Measures to insure that all patients receive effective assessment and management of their pain must take into account this disparity, and endeavor to achieve congruence by reconnecting the health professions to their ancient and core value-the relief of suffering.

KW - Assessment

KW - Controlled substances

KW - Damages

KW - Ethics

KW - Law

KW - Liability

KW - Management

KW - Narcotics

KW - Pain

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036437893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036437893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J354v16n01_06

DO - 10.1300/J354v16n01_06

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 81

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy

JF - Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy

SN - 1536-0288

IS - 1

ER -