Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites

Michael K. Gould, Lori C. Sakoda, Debra P. Ritzwoller, Michael J. Simoff, Christine M. Neslund-Dudas, Lawrence H. Kushi, Lisa Carter-Harris, Heather Spencer Feigelson, George Minowada, V. Paul Doria-Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Lung cancer screening registries can monitor screening outcomes and improve quality of care. Objectives: To describe nascent lung cancer screening programs and share efficient data collection approaches for mandatory registry reporting in four integrated health care systems of the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Research Network. Methods: We documented the distinctive characteristics of lung cancer screening programs, and we provide examples of strategies to facilitate data collection and describe early challenges and possible solutions. In addition, we report preliminary data on use and outcomes of screening with low-dose computed tomography at each of the participating sites. Results: Programs varied in approaches to confirming patient eligibility, ordering screening low-dose computed tomographic scans, and coordinating follow-up care. Most data elements were collected from structured fields in electronic health records, but sites also made use of standardized order templates, local procedure codes, identifiable hashtags in radiology reports, and natural language processing algorithms. Common challenges included incomplete documentation of tobacco smoking history, difficulty distinguishing between scans performed for screening versus diagnosis or surveillance, and variable adherence with use of standardized templates. Adherence with eligibility criteria as well as the accuracy and completeness of data collection appeared to depend at least partly on availability of personnel and other resources to support the successful implementation of screening. Conclusions: To maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, minimize the burden of data collection, and facilitate research and quality improvement, clinical workflow and information technology should be purposefully designed to ensure that patients meet eligibility criteria and receive appropriate follow-up testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1827-1835
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Lung Neoplasms
Research
Registries
Neoplasms
Mandatory Reporting
Natural Language Processing
Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Aftercare
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Workflow
Electronic Health Records
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Radiology
Documentation
Smoking
History
Tomography
Technology

Keywords

  • Electronic Health Records
  • Lung Cancer
  • Registry
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Gould, M. K., Sakoda, L. C., Ritzwoller, D. P., Simoff, M. J., Neslund-Dudas, C. M., Kushi, L. H., ... Paul Doria-Rose, V. (2017). Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 14(12), 1827-1835. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-237OC

Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites. / Gould, Michael K.; Sakoda, Lori C.; Ritzwoller, Debra P.; Simoff, Michael J.; Neslund-Dudas, Christine M.; Kushi, Lawrence H.; Carter-Harris, Lisa; Feigelson, Heather Spencer; Minowada, George; Paul Doria-Rose, V.

In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 14, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 1827-1835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, MK, Sakoda, LC, Ritzwoller, DP, Simoff, MJ, Neslund-Dudas, CM, Kushi, LH, Carter-Harris, L, Feigelson, HS, Minowada, G & Paul Doria-Rose, V 2017, 'Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1827-1835. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-237OC
Gould, Michael K. ; Sakoda, Lori C. ; Ritzwoller, Debra P. ; Simoff, Michael J. ; Neslund-Dudas, Christine M. ; Kushi, Lawrence H. ; Carter-Harris, Lisa ; Feigelson, Heather Spencer ; Minowada, George ; Paul Doria-Rose, V. / Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites. In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2017 ; Vol. 14, No. 12. pp. 1827-1835.
@article{96a722ede3d441ee862b40dec3d37a6a,
title = "Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites",
abstract = "Rationale: Lung cancer screening registries can monitor screening outcomes and improve quality of care. Objectives: To describe nascent lung cancer screening programs and share efficient data collection approaches for mandatory registry reporting in four integrated health care systems of the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Research Network. Methods: We documented the distinctive characteristics of lung cancer screening programs, and we provide examples of strategies to facilitate data collection and describe early challenges and possible solutions. In addition, we report preliminary data on use and outcomes of screening with low-dose computed tomography at each of the participating sites. Results: Programs varied in approaches to confirming patient eligibility, ordering screening low-dose computed tomographic scans, and coordinating follow-up care. Most data elements were collected from structured fields in electronic health records, but sites also made use of standardized order templates, local procedure codes, identifiable hashtags in radiology reports, and natural language processing algorithms. Common challenges included incomplete documentation of tobacco smoking history, difficulty distinguishing between scans performed for screening versus diagnosis or surveillance, and variable adherence with use of standardized templates. Adherence with eligibility criteria as well as the accuracy and completeness of data collection appeared to depend at least partly on availability of personnel and other resources to support the successful implementation of screening. Conclusions: To maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, minimize the burden of data collection, and facilitate research and quality improvement, clinical workflow and information technology should be purposefully designed to ensure that patients meet eligibility criteria and receive appropriate follow-up testing.",
keywords = "Electronic Health Records, Lung Cancer, Registry, Screening",
author = "Gould, {Michael K.} and Sakoda, {Lori C.} and Ritzwoller, {Debra P.} and Simoff, {Michael J.} and Neslund-Dudas, {Christine M.} and Kushi, {Lawrence H.} and Lisa Carter-Harris and Feigelson, {Heather Spencer} and George Minowada and {Paul Doria-Rose}, V.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-237OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1827--1835",
journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
issn = "2325-6621",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four cancer research network sites

AU - Gould, Michael K.

AU - Sakoda, Lori C.

AU - Ritzwoller, Debra P.

AU - Simoff, Michael J.

AU - Neslund-Dudas, Christine M.

AU - Kushi, Lawrence H.

AU - Carter-Harris, Lisa

AU - Feigelson, Heather Spencer

AU - Minowada, George

AU - Paul Doria-Rose, V.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Rationale: Lung cancer screening registries can monitor screening outcomes and improve quality of care. Objectives: To describe nascent lung cancer screening programs and share efficient data collection approaches for mandatory registry reporting in four integrated health care systems of the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Research Network. Methods: We documented the distinctive characteristics of lung cancer screening programs, and we provide examples of strategies to facilitate data collection and describe early challenges and possible solutions. In addition, we report preliminary data on use and outcomes of screening with low-dose computed tomography at each of the participating sites. Results: Programs varied in approaches to confirming patient eligibility, ordering screening low-dose computed tomographic scans, and coordinating follow-up care. Most data elements were collected from structured fields in electronic health records, but sites also made use of standardized order templates, local procedure codes, identifiable hashtags in radiology reports, and natural language processing algorithms. Common challenges included incomplete documentation of tobacco smoking history, difficulty distinguishing between scans performed for screening versus diagnosis or surveillance, and variable adherence with use of standardized templates. Adherence with eligibility criteria as well as the accuracy and completeness of data collection appeared to depend at least partly on availability of personnel and other resources to support the successful implementation of screening. Conclusions: To maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, minimize the burden of data collection, and facilitate research and quality improvement, clinical workflow and information technology should be purposefully designed to ensure that patients meet eligibility criteria and receive appropriate follow-up testing.

AB - Rationale: Lung cancer screening registries can monitor screening outcomes and improve quality of care. Objectives: To describe nascent lung cancer screening programs and share efficient data collection approaches for mandatory registry reporting in four integrated health care systems of the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Research Network. Methods: We documented the distinctive characteristics of lung cancer screening programs, and we provide examples of strategies to facilitate data collection and describe early challenges and possible solutions. In addition, we report preliminary data on use and outcomes of screening with low-dose computed tomography at each of the participating sites. Results: Programs varied in approaches to confirming patient eligibility, ordering screening low-dose computed tomographic scans, and coordinating follow-up care. Most data elements were collected from structured fields in electronic health records, but sites also made use of standardized order templates, local procedure codes, identifiable hashtags in radiology reports, and natural language processing algorithms. Common challenges included incomplete documentation of tobacco smoking history, difficulty distinguishing between scans performed for screening versus diagnosis or surveillance, and variable adherence with use of standardized templates. Adherence with eligibility criteria as well as the accuracy and completeness of data collection appeared to depend at least partly on availability of personnel and other resources to support the successful implementation of screening. Conclusions: To maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, minimize the burden of data collection, and facilitate research and quality improvement, clinical workflow and information technology should be purposefully designed to ensure that patients meet eligibility criteria and receive appropriate follow-up testing.

KW - Electronic Health Records

KW - Lung Cancer

KW - Registry

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039802209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039802209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-237OC

DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-237OC

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85039802209

VL - 14

SP - 1827

EP - 1835

JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

SN - 2325-6621

IS - 12

ER -