MO‐FF‐A2‐04: Pulsed Reduced Dose‐Rate Radiotherapy On a Helical Tomotherapy Unit

Yi Rong, S. Howard, B. Paliwal, J. Welsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose/Background: Pulsed reduced dose‐rate radiotherapy (PRDR) re‐irradiation has the potential to reduce late normal tissue toxicity while yielding nearly identical tumoricidal effect. A typical method using a conventional linac is to deliver a series of 20cGy pulses separated by 3‐minute intervals to give an average dose‐rate of 6.67cGy/min. Dissimilarly, PRDR done via helical tomotherapy would not require an interlude if the sub‐fraction time is approximately 3 minutes, since the top of the PTV will have had a 3‐minute “rest” by the time the bottom is finished. However, intrinsic MLC leaf open time (LOT) limitations in tomotherapy deteriorate plan quality and deliverability when attempting to deliver very low doses (<40cGy). We investigated various means to overcome this limitation to deliver PRDR with a helical tomotherapy device. Method and Materials: Two different cases (central and non‐central targets) were studied. Plans were generated with different combinations of jaw‐width (1.05cm and 2.5cm), pitch (0.43 and 0.86), and modulation factor (MF) (1.5 and 2.5) to administer eight 25cGy sub‐fractions as part of 2Gy to PTV for 20 fractions, giving a total of 40Gy dose. Plans were compared using dose‐volume histogram (DVH), homogeneity indexes (HI), conformation number (CN), and treatment time. DQA for each plan was performed to assess deliverability. Results: Clinically acceptable DVHs with a ∼3 minute treatment duration are achievable with several combinations of jaw width and pitch. However, dose discrepancies were >3% in those plans where average LOT is <70msec, which falls into the high‐error region in the MLC latency curve. The combination of small jaw‐width (1cm), low MF (1.5) and large pitch (0.86), as well as using directional blocks gives clinically acceptable results in dose distribution, beam‐on time, and delivery accuracy (<3%). Conclusion: With a careful selection of planning parameters, PRDR re‐irradiation is deliverable in an efficient fashion on a tomotherapy unit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MO‐FF‐A2‐04 : Pulsed Reduced Dose‐Rate Radiotherapy On a Helical Tomotherapy Unit. / Rong, Yi; Howard, S.; Paliwal, B.; Welsh, J.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97e387d1df694c068ab87cfd8e8ca6b1,
title = "MO‐FF‐A2‐04: Pulsed Reduced Dose‐Rate Radiotherapy On a Helical Tomotherapy Unit",
abstract = "Purpose/Background: Pulsed reduced dose‐rate radiotherapy (PRDR) re‐irradiation has the potential to reduce late normal tissue toxicity while yielding nearly identical tumoricidal effect. A typical method using a conventional linac is to deliver a series of 20cGy pulses separated by 3‐minute intervals to give an average dose‐rate of 6.67cGy/min. Dissimilarly, PRDR done via helical tomotherapy would not require an interlude if the sub‐fraction time is approximately 3 minutes, since the top of the PTV will have had a 3‐minute “rest” by the time the bottom is finished. However, intrinsic MLC leaf open time (LOT) limitations in tomotherapy deteriorate plan quality and deliverability when attempting to deliver very low doses (<40cGy). We investigated various means to overcome this limitation to deliver PRDR with a helical tomotherapy device. Method and Materials: Two different cases (central and non‐central targets) were studied. Plans were generated with different combinations of jaw‐width (1.05cm and 2.5cm), pitch (0.43 and 0.86), and modulation factor (MF) (1.5 and 2.5) to administer eight 25cGy sub‐fractions as part of 2Gy to PTV for 20 fractions, giving a total of 40Gy dose. Plans were compared using dose‐volume histogram (DVH), homogeneity indexes (HI), conformation number (CN), and treatment time. DQA for each plan was performed to assess deliverability. Results: Clinically acceptable DVHs with a ∼3 minute treatment duration are achievable with several combinations of jaw width and pitch. However, dose discrepancies were >3{\%} in those plans where average LOT is <70msec, which falls into the high‐error region in the MLC latency curve. The combination of small jaw‐width (1cm), low MF (1.5) and large pitch (0.86), as well as using directional blocks gives clinically acceptable results in dose distribution, beam‐on time, and delivery accuracy (<3{\%}). Conclusion: With a careful selection of planning parameters, PRDR re‐irradiation is deliverable in an efficient fashion on a tomotherapy unit.",
author = "Yi Rong and S. Howard and B. Paliwal and J. Welsh",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182286",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐FF‐A2‐04

T2 - Pulsed Reduced Dose‐Rate Radiotherapy On a Helical Tomotherapy Unit

AU - Rong, Yi

AU - Howard, S.

AU - Paliwal, B.

AU - Welsh, J.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose/Background: Pulsed reduced dose‐rate radiotherapy (PRDR) re‐irradiation has the potential to reduce late normal tissue toxicity while yielding nearly identical tumoricidal effect. A typical method using a conventional linac is to deliver a series of 20cGy pulses separated by 3‐minute intervals to give an average dose‐rate of 6.67cGy/min. Dissimilarly, PRDR done via helical tomotherapy would not require an interlude if the sub‐fraction time is approximately 3 minutes, since the top of the PTV will have had a 3‐minute “rest” by the time the bottom is finished. However, intrinsic MLC leaf open time (LOT) limitations in tomotherapy deteriorate plan quality and deliverability when attempting to deliver very low doses (<40cGy). We investigated various means to overcome this limitation to deliver PRDR with a helical tomotherapy device. Method and Materials: Two different cases (central and non‐central targets) were studied. Plans were generated with different combinations of jaw‐width (1.05cm and 2.5cm), pitch (0.43 and 0.86), and modulation factor (MF) (1.5 and 2.5) to administer eight 25cGy sub‐fractions as part of 2Gy to PTV for 20 fractions, giving a total of 40Gy dose. Plans were compared using dose‐volume histogram (DVH), homogeneity indexes (HI), conformation number (CN), and treatment time. DQA for each plan was performed to assess deliverability. Results: Clinically acceptable DVHs with a ∼3 minute treatment duration are achievable with several combinations of jaw width and pitch. However, dose discrepancies were >3% in those plans where average LOT is <70msec, which falls into the high‐error region in the MLC latency curve. The combination of small jaw‐width (1cm), low MF (1.5) and large pitch (0.86), as well as using directional blocks gives clinically acceptable results in dose distribution, beam‐on time, and delivery accuracy (<3%). Conclusion: With a careful selection of planning parameters, PRDR re‐irradiation is deliverable in an efficient fashion on a tomotherapy unit.

AB - Purpose/Background: Pulsed reduced dose‐rate radiotherapy (PRDR) re‐irradiation has the potential to reduce late normal tissue toxicity while yielding nearly identical tumoricidal effect. A typical method using a conventional linac is to deliver a series of 20cGy pulses separated by 3‐minute intervals to give an average dose‐rate of 6.67cGy/min. Dissimilarly, PRDR done via helical tomotherapy would not require an interlude if the sub‐fraction time is approximately 3 minutes, since the top of the PTV will have had a 3‐minute “rest” by the time the bottom is finished. However, intrinsic MLC leaf open time (LOT) limitations in tomotherapy deteriorate plan quality and deliverability when attempting to deliver very low doses (<40cGy). We investigated various means to overcome this limitation to deliver PRDR with a helical tomotherapy device. Method and Materials: Two different cases (central and non‐central targets) were studied. Plans were generated with different combinations of jaw‐width (1.05cm and 2.5cm), pitch (0.43 and 0.86), and modulation factor (MF) (1.5 and 2.5) to administer eight 25cGy sub‐fractions as part of 2Gy to PTV for 20 fractions, giving a total of 40Gy dose. Plans were compared using dose‐volume histogram (DVH), homogeneity indexes (HI), conformation number (CN), and treatment time. DQA for each plan was performed to assess deliverability. Results: Clinically acceptable DVHs with a ∼3 minute treatment duration are achievable with several combinations of jaw width and pitch. However, dose discrepancies were >3% in those plans where average LOT is <70msec, which falls into the high‐error region in the MLC latency curve. The combination of small jaw‐width (1cm), low MF (1.5) and large pitch (0.86), as well as using directional blocks gives clinically acceptable results in dose distribution, beam‐on time, and delivery accuracy (<3%). Conclusion: With a careful selection of planning parameters, PRDR re‐irradiation is deliverable in an efficient fashion on a tomotherapy unit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024798620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024798620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182286

DO - 10.1118/1.3182286

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024798620

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -