MO‐E‐105‐01: How To Be A Journal Referee

S. Becker, John M Boone, C. Orton, G. Starkschall, B. Thomadsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Being a referee for a journal article is an important yet daunting task. It is especially worrisome for someone who has little reviewing experience. It is important to remember is that it is an honor and perhaps a duty, but not a burden. Someone considers you to be an expert in the subject and it is with that mindset that you should approach the task. Each part of the review process has its own difficulties:• Grammar and Language: How much of this do you need to do? Does poor grasp of the English language warrant rejection. Is it effective or excessively verbose?• Science: Is this project novel? How do you determine that? How similar can it be to other previously published manuscripts?• References: Are the proper studies referenced? How much does this affect the review?• Methods: How do you determine if the methods are sound? How much can you suggest without trying to be a collaborator?• Results: Are graphs and tables being utilized wisely? Are there an excessive number of them?All of these issues are important part of the review process and need to be considered. But how do you weight them in your final recommendation and communicate them to the authors and editors? This panel of senor medical physics, which has extensive experience in refereeing, will help guide the audience through the entire review process. These experts will share their experiences and methods to help new referees best prepare for the opportunity of reviewing manuscripts. Learning Objectives: 1. Learn the role of the referee and what is expected of them. 2. Learn how to perform a review. 3. Learn how to communicate a review with authors and editors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Language
Physics
Hand Strength
Learning
Weights and Measures
Rejection (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Becker, S., Boone, J. M., Orton, C., Starkschall, G., & Thomadsen, B. (2013). MO‐E‐105‐01: How To Be A Journal Referee. Medical Physics, 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4815273

MO‐E‐105‐01 : How To Be A Journal Referee. / Becker, S.; Boone, John M; Orton, C.; Starkschall, G.; Thomadsen, B.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Becker, S, Boone, JM, Orton, C, Starkschall, G & Thomadsen, B 2013, 'MO‐E‐105‐01: How To Be A Journal Referee', Medical Physics, vol. 40, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4815273
Becker, S. ; Boone, John M ; Orton, C. ; Starkschall, G. ; Thomadsen, B. / MO‐E‐105‐01 : How To Be A Journal Referee. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6.
@article{7dc3a5680fe44689985d8864f2d8fd40,
title = "MO‐E‐105‐01: How To Be A Journal Referee",
abstract = "Being a referee for a journal article is an important yet daunting task. It is especially worrisome for someone who has little reviewing experience. It is important to remember is that it is an honor and perhaps a duty, but not a burden. Someone considers you to be an expert in the subject and it is with that mindset that you should approach the task. Each part of the review process has its own difficulties:• Grammar and Language: How much of this do you need to do? Does poor grasp of the English language warrant rejection. Is it effective or excessively verbose?• Science: Is this project novel? How do you determine that? How similar can it be to other previously published manuscripts?• References: Are the proper studies referenced? How much does this affect the review?• Methods: How do you determine if the methods are sound? How much can you suggest without trying to be a collaborator?• Results: Are graphs and tables being utilized wisely? Are there an excessive number of them?All of these issues are important part of the review process and need to be considered. But how do you weight them in your final recommendation and communicate them to the authors and editors? This panel of senor medical physics, which has extensive experience in refereeing, will help guide the audience through the entire review process. These experts will share their experiences and methods to help new referees best prepare for the opportunity of reviewing manuscripts. Learning Objectives: 1. Learn the role of the referee and what is expected of them. 2. Learn how to perform a review. 3. Learn how to communicate a review with authors and editors.",
author = "S. Becker and Boone, {John M} and C. Orton and G. Starkschall and B. Thomadsen",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.4815273",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐E‐105‐01

T2 - How To Be A Journal Referee

AU - Becker, S.

AU - Boone, John M

AU - Orton, C.

AU - Starkschall, G.

AU - Thomadsen, B.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Being a referee for a journal article is an important yet daunting task. It is especially worrisome for someone who has little reviewing experience. It is important to remember is that it is an honor and perhaps a duty, but not a burden. Someone considers you to be an expert in the subject and it is with that mindset that you should approach the task. Each part of the review process has its own difficulties:• Grammar and Language: How much of this do you need to do? Does poor grasp of the English language warrant rejection. Is it effective or excessively verbose?• Science: Is this project novel? How do you determine that? How similar can it be to other previously published manuscripts?• References: Are the proper studies referenced? How much does this affect the review?• Methods: How do you determine if the methods are sound? How much can you suggest without trying to be a collaborator?• Results: Are graphs and tables being utilized wisely? Are there an excessive number of them?All of these issues are important part of the review process and need to be considered. But how do you weight them in your final recommendation and communicate them to the authors and editors? This panel of senor medical physics, which has extensive experience in refereeing, will help guide the audience through the entire review process. These experts will share their experiences and methods to help new referees best prepare for the opportunity of reviewing manuscripts. Learning Objectives: 1. Learn the role of the referee and what is expected of them. 2. Learn how to perform a review. 3. Learn how to communicate a review with authors and editors.

AB - Being a referee for a journal article is an important yet daunting task. It is especially worrisome for someone who has little reviewing experience. It is important to remember is that it is an honor and perhaps a duty, but not a burden. Someone considers you to be an expert in the subject and it is with that mindset that you should approach the task. Each part of the review process has its own difficulties:• Grammar and Language: How much of this do you need to do? Does poor grasp of the English language warrant rejection. Is it effective or excessively verbose?• Science: Is this project novel? How do you determine that? How similar can it be to other previously published manuscripts?• References: Are the proper studies referenced? How much does this affect the review?• Methods: How do you determine if the methods are sound? How much can you suggest without trying to be a collaborator?• Results: Are graphs and tables being utilized wisely? Are there an excessive number of them?All of these issues are important part of the review process and need to be considered. But how do you weight them in your final recommendation and communicate them to the authors and editors? This panel of senor medical physics, which has extensive experience in refereeing, will help guide the audience through the entire review process. These experts will share their experiences and methods to help new referees best prepare for the opportunity of reviewing manuscripts. Learning Objectives: 1. Learn the role of the referee and what is expected of them. 2. Learn how to perform a review. 3. Learn how to communicate a review with authors and editors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024773942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024773942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4815273

DO - 10.1118/1.4815273

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024773942

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -