Modeling Rainwater Storage in Distributed Reservoir Systems in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Savannah Regions

Pramod Pandey, Michelle L. Soupir, Vijay P. Singh, Sudhindra N. Panda, Vinay Pandey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using a hydrologic model this study estimated rainwater storages in field-scale on-farm reservoir (OFR) systems at two locations: (1) Fort Worth, Texas, US; (2) Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. The water storages were estimated for variable OFR sizes: 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25% of the farm area. Water losses through seepage and evaporation were estimated using variable saturated hydraulic conductivity conditions: 0.33, 0.64, 1.3, 5 cm/h, which corresponded to the ranges of hydraulic conductivity of loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sandy soils, respectively. Results indicated that the water loss through evaporation was dominant at the first location, while seepage was at the second location. Changing the OFR sizes captured 5 to 28% of the total rainfall received in the farm area of the first location and 20-40% at the second location. Finally, a comparative economic analysis was made between a distributed OFR system and a centralized large reservoir that indicated that the distributed OFR system benefits exceeded the benefits of a large reservoir.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3091-3111
Number of pages21
JournalWater Resources Management
Volume25
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

tropical region
rainwater
Farms
farm
modeling
Hydraulic conductivity
Seepage
Evaporation
Water
seepage
hydraulic conductivity
Economic analysis
evaporation
Rain
loamy sand
Sand
economic analysis
sandy loam
water storage
loam

Keywords

  • On-farm reservoir
  • Rainwater harvesting
  • Reservoir

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Modeling Rainwater Storage in Distributed Reservoir Systems in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Savannah Regions. / Pandey, Pramod; Soupir, Michelle L.; Singh, Vijay P.; Panda, Sudhindra N.; Pandey, Vinay.

In: Water Resources Management, Vol. 25, No. 13, 01.10.2011, p. 3091-3111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pandey, Pramod ; Soupir, Michelle L. ; Singh, Vijay P. ; Panda, Sudhindra N. ; Pandey, Vinay. / Modeling Rainwater Storage in Distributed Reservoir Systems in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Savannah Regions. In: Water Resources Management. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 13. pp. 3091-3111.
@article{86b7fb7692394a6397edbcd71314a231,
title = "Modeling Rainwater Storage in Distributed Reservoir Systems in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Savannah Regions",
abstract = "Using a hydrologic model this study estimated rainwater storages in field-scale on-farm reservoir (OFR) systems at two locations: (1) Fort Worth, Texas, US; (2) Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. The water storages were estimated for variable OFR sizes: 1{\%}, 5{\%}, 10{\%}, 15{\%}, and 25{\%} of the farm area. Water losses through seepage and evaporation were estimated using variable saturated hydraulic conductivity conditions: 0.33, 0.64, 1.3, 5 cm/h, which corresponded to the ranges of hydraulic conductivity of loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sandy soils, respectively. Results indicated that the water loss through evaporation was dominant at the first location, while seepage was at the second location. Changing the OFR sizes captured 5 to 28{\%} of the total rainfall received in the farm area of the first location and 20-40{\%} at the second location. Finally, a comparative economic analysis was made between a distributed OFR system and a centralized large reservoir that indicated that the distributed OFR system benefits exceeded the benefits of a large reservoir.",
keywords = "On-farm reservoir, Rainwater harvesting, Reservoir",
author = "Pramod Pandey and Soupir, {Michelle L.} and Singh, {Vijay P.} and Panda, {Sudhindra N.} and Vinay Pandey",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11269-011-9847-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "3091--3111",
journal = "Water Resources Management",
issn = "0920-4741",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling Rainwater Storage in Distributed Reservoir Systems in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Savannah Regions

AU - Pandey, Pramod

AU - Soupir, Michelle L.

AU - Singh, Vijay P.

AU - Panda, Sudhindra N.

AU - Pandey, Vinay

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Using a hydrologic model this study estimated rainwater storages in field-scale on-farm reservoir (OFR) systems at two locations: (1) Fort Worth, Texas, US; (2) Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. The water storages were estimated for variable OFR sizes: 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25% of the farm area. Water losses through seepage and evaporation were estimated using variable saturated hydraulic conductivity conditions: 0.33, 0.64, 1.3, 5 cm/h, which corresponded to the ranges of hydraulic conductivity of loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sandy soils, respectively. Results indicated that the water loss through evaporation was dominant at the first location, while seepage was at the second location. Changing the OFR sizes captured 5 to 28% of the total rainfall received in the farm area of the first location and 20-40% at the second location. Finally, a comparative economic analysis was made between a distributed OFR system and a centralized large reservoir that indicated that the distributed OFR system benefits exceeded the benefits of a large reservoir.

AB - Using a hydrologic model this study estimated rainwater storages in field-scale on-farm reservoir (OFR) systems at two locations: (1) Fort Worth, Texas, US; (2) Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. The water storages were estimated for variable OFR sizes: 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25% of the farm area. Water losses through seepage and evaporation were estimated using variable saturated hydraulic conductivity conditions: 0.33, 0.64, 1.3, 5 cm/h, which corresponded to the ranges of hydraulic conductivity of loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sandy soils, respectively. Results indicated that the water loss through evaporation was dominant at the first location, while seepage was at the second location. Changing the OFR sizes captured 5 to 28% of the total rainfall received in the farm area of the first location and 20-40% at the second location. Finally, a comparative economic analysis was made between a distributed OFR system and a centralized large reservoir that indicated that the distributed OFR system benefits exceeded the benefits of a large reservoir.

KW - On-farm reservoir

KW - Rainwater harvesting

KW - Reservoir

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053571851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053571851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11269-011-9847-5

DO - 10.1007/s11269-011-9847-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053571851

VL - 25

SP - 3091

EP - 3111

JO - Water Resources Management

JF - Water Resources Management

SN - 0920-4741

IS - 13

ER -