Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center: A modified delphi consensus

Bryn Mumma, Conrad Williamson, Rahul K. Khare, Kevin E. Mackey, Deborah B. Diercks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), approximately two thirds present to a hospital not capable of percutaneous coronary intervention. Transfer to a STEMI-receiving center delays time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI, but factors that affect this delay have not been well studied. We performed a 3-round modified Delphi study to identify system practices that minimize transfer time to a STEMI-receiving center. A comprehensive literature review was used to identify candidate system practices. Emergency medical services, emergency medicine, and cardiology experts were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement that a variable was "very important (5)" or "important (4)" with a mean score ≥4.25 or 80% agreement that a variable was "not important (1)" or "somewhat important (2)" with a mean score ≤1.75. In round 1, participants rated the candidate items and suggested additional items. Individual feedback was provided, and participants discussed items via conference calls before rating them again in round 2. In round 3, participants ranked the consensus items from rounds 1-2 from most to least important, and the mean score for each item was calculated. Of the 98 experts invited, 29 participated in round 1, 22 in round 2, and 14 in round 3. Participants identified 18 system practices that they agree are critical in minimizing transfer time to STEMI-receiving centers, with the most important being performance of a prehospital electrocardiogram and having established transfer protocols. These factors should be considered in the development of STEMI systems of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-24
Number of pages5
JournalCritical Pathways in Cardiology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Myocardial Infarction
Delphi Technique
Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medical Services
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Cardiology
Reperfusion
Electrocardiography
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Door-to-balloon time
  • Regionalization
  • ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center : A modified delphi consensus. / Mumma, Bryn; Williamson, Conrad; Khare, Rahul K.; Mackey, Kevin E.; Diercks, Deborah B.

In: Critical Pathways in Cardiology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 20-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mumma, Bryn ; Williamson, Conrad ; Khare, Rahul K. ; Mackey, Kevin E. ; Diercks, Deborah B. / Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center : A modified delphi consensus. In: Critical Pathways in Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 20-24.
@article{fe39b9c8091c4620902a2b43c8fe3892,
title = "Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center: A modified delphi consensus",
abstract = "Of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), approximately two thirds present to a hospital not capable of percutaneous coronary intervention. Transfer to a STEMI-receiving center delays time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI, but factors that affect this delay have not been well studied. We performed a 3-round modified Delphi study to identify system practices that minimize transfer time to a STEMI-receiving center. A comprehensive literature review was used to identify candidate system practices. Emergency medical services, emergency medicine, and cardiology experts were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as 80{\%} agreement that a variable was {"}very important (5){"} or {"}important (4){"} with a mean score ≥4.25 or 80{\%} agreement that a variable was {"}not important (1){"} or {"}somewhat important (2){"} with a mean score ≤1.75. In round 1, participants rated the candidate items and suggested additional items. Individual feedback was provided, and participants discussed items via conference calls before rating them again in round 2. In round 3, participants ranked the consensus items from rounds 1-2 from most to least important, and the mean score for each item was calculated. Of the 98 experts invited, 29 participated in round 1, 22 in round 2, and 14 in round 3. Participants identified 18 system practices that they agree are critical in minimizing transfer time to STEMI-receiving centers, with the most important being performance of a prehospital electrocardiogram and having established transfer protocols. These factors should be considered in the development of STEMI systems of care.",
keywords = "Acute myocardial infarction, Door-to-balloon time, Regionalization, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction",
author = "Bryn Mumma and Conrad Williamson and Khare, {Rahul K.} and Mackey, {Kevin E.} and Diercks, {Deborah B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/HPC.0000000000000003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "20--24",
journal = "Critical Pathways in Cardiology",
issn = "1535-282X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimizing transfer time to an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-receiving center

T2 - A modified delphi consensus

AU - Mumma, Bryn

AU - Williamson, Conrad

AU - Khare, Rahul K.

AU - Mackey, Kevin E.

AU - Diercks, Deborah B.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), approximately two thirds present to a hospital not capable of percutaneous coronary intervention. Transfer to a STEMI-receiving center delays time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI, but factors that affect this delay have not been well studied. We performed a 3-round modified Delphi study to identify system practices that minimize transfer time to a STEMI-receiving center. A comprehensive literature review was used to identify candidate system practices. Emergency medical services, emergency medicine, and cardiology experts were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement that a variable was "very important (5)" or "important (4)" with a mean score ≥4.25 or 80% agreement that a variable was "not important (1)" or "somewhat important (2)" with a mean score ≤1.75. In round 1, participants rated the candidate items and suggested additional items. Individual feedback was provided, and participants discussed items via conference calls before rating them again in round 2. In round 3, participants ranked the consensus items from rounds 1-2 from most to least important, and the mean score for each item was calculated. Of the 98 experts invited, 29 participated in round 1, 22 in round 2, and 14 in round 3. Participants identified 18 system practices that they agree are critical in minimizing transfer time to STEMI-receiving centers, with the most important being performance of a prehospital electrocardiogram and having established transfer protocols. These factors should be considered in the development of STEMI systems of care.

AB - Of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), approximately two thirds present to a hospital not capable of percutaneous coronary intervention. Transfer to a STEMI-receiving center delays time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI, but factors that affect this delay have not been well studied. We performed a 3-round modified Delphi study to identify system practices that minimize transfer time to a STEMI-receiving center. A comprehensive literature review was used to identify candidate system practices. Emergency medical services, emergency medicine, and cardiology experts were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement that a variable was "very important (5)" or "important (4)" with a mean score ≥4.25 or 80% agreement that a variable was "not important (1)" or "somewhat important (2)" with a mean score ≤1.75. In round 1, participants rated the candidate items and suggested additional items. Individual feedback was provided, and participants discussed items via conference calls before rating them again in round 2. In round 3, participants ranked the consensus items from rounds 1-2 from most to least important, and the mean score for each item was calculated. Of the 98 experts invited, 29 participated in round 1, 22 in round 2, and 14 in round 3. Participants identified 18 system practices that they agree are critical in minimizing transfer time to STEMI-receiving centers, with the most important being performance of a prehospital electrocardiogram and having established transfer protocols. These factors should be considered in the development of STEMI systems of care.

KW - Acute myocardial infarction

KW - Door-to-balloon time

KW - Regionalization

KW - ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894485764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894485764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000003

DO - 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000003

M3 - Article

C2 - 24526147

AN - SCOPUS:84894485764

VL - 13

SP - 20

EP - 24

JO - Critical Pathways in Cardiology

JF - Critical Pathways in Cardiology

SN - 1535-282X

IS - 1

ER -