Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Gastric Resection

Sepideh Gholami, Michael R. Cassidy, Vivian E. Strong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive gastric resections carry several advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery time, reduced pain, and decreased hospital length of stay and quicker return to work. Numerous trials have proved that laparoscopic and robotic-assisted gastrectomy provides equivalent surgical and oncologic outcomes to open approaches. As with any minimally invasive approach, advanced minimally invasive training and good judgment by a surgeon are paramount in selecting patients in whom a minimally invasive approach is feasible. With increasing research in patient populations with more advanced disease, the indications are likely to continue to expand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-264
Number of pages16
JournalSurgical Clinics of North America
Volume97
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Length of Stay
Stomach
Return to Work
Robotics
Gastrectomy
Pain
Research
Population
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Laparoscopic gastrectomy
  • Minimally invasive gastrectomy
  • Robotic gastrectomy
  • Techniques in gastric resection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Gastric Resection. / Gholami, Sepideh; Cassidy, Michael R.; Strong, Vivian E.

In: Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 97, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 249-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gholami, Sepideh ; Cassidy, Michael R. ; Strong, Vivian E. / Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Gastric Resection. In: Surgical Clinics of North America. 2017 ; Vol. 97, No. 2. pp. 249-264.
@article{c020654402584798b5eeecf28618b215,
title = "Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Gastric Resection",
abstract = "Minimally invasive gastric resections carry several advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery time, reduced pain, and decreased hospital length of stay and quicker return to work. Numerous trials have proved that laparoscopic and robotic-assisted gastrectomy provides equivalent surgical and oncologic outcomes to open approaches. As with any minimally invasive approach, advanced minimally invasive training and good judgment by a surgeon are paramount in selecting patients in whom a minimally invasive approach is feasible. With increasing research in patient populations with more advanced disease, the indications are likely to continue to expand.",
keywords = "Gastric cancer, Laparoscopic gastrectomy, Minimally invasive gastrectomy, Robotic gastrectomy, Techniques in gastric resection",
author = "Sepideh Gholami and Cassidy, {Michael R.} and Strong, {Vivian E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.suc.2016.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "249--264",
journal = "Surgical Clinics of North America",
issn = "0039-6109",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Gastric Resection

AU - Gholami, Sepideh

AU - Cassidy, Michael R.

AU - Strong, Vivian E.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Minimally invasive gastric resections carry several advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery time, reduced pain, and decreased hospital length of stay and quicker return to work. Numerous trials have proved that laparoscopic and robotic-assisted gastrectomy provides equivalent surgical and oncologic outcomes to open approaches. As with any minimally invasive approach, advanced minimally invasive training and good judgment by a surgeon are paramount in selecting patients in whom a minimally invasive approach is feasible. With increasing research in patient populations with more advanced disease, the indications are likely to continue to expand.

AB - Minimally invasive gastric resections carry several advantages, including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery time, reduced pain, and decreased hospital length of stay and quicker return to work. Numerous trials have proved that laparoscopic and robotic-assisted gastrectomy provides equivalent surgical and oncologic outcomes to open approaches. As with any minimally invasive approach, advanced minimally invasive training and good judgment by a surgeon are paramount in selecting patients in whom a minimally invasive approach is feasible. With increasing research in patient populations with more advanced disease, the indications are likely to continue to expand.

KW - Gastric cancer

KW - Laparoscopic gastrectomy

KW - Minimally invasive gastrectomy

KW - Robotic gastrectomy

KW - Techniques in gastric resection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012895068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012895068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.suc.2016.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.suc.2016.11.003

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28325185

AN - SCOPUS:85012895068

VL - 97

SP - 249

EP - 264

JO - Surgical Clinics of North America

JF - Surgical Clinics of North America

SN - 0039-6109

IS - 2

ER -