Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research

Konrad J. Karczewski, Nicholas P. Tatonetti, Arjun K. Manrai, Chirag J. Patel, Charles Brown, John P.A. Ioannidis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science is not done in a vacuum – across fields of biomedicine, scientists have built on previous research and used data published in previous papers. A mainstay of scientific inquiry is the publication of one’s research and recognition for this work is given in the form of citations and notoriety--ideally given in proportion to the quality of the work. Academic incentives, however, may encourage individual researchers to prioritize career ambitions over scientific truth. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine published a commentary calling scientists who repurpose data “research parasites” who misuse data generated by others to demonstrate alternative hypotheses1. In our opinion, the concept of data hoarding not only runs contrary to the spirit of, but also hinders scientific progress. Scientific research is meant to seek objective truth, rather than promote a personal agenda, and the only way to do so is through maximum transparency and reproducibility, no matter who is using the data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017
PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd
Pages117-119
Number of pages3
Edition212679
ISBN (Print)9789813207813
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Event22nd Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, PSB 2017 - Kohala Coast, United States
Duration: Jan 4 2017Jan 8 2017

Other

Other22nd Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, PSB 2017
CountryUnited States
CityKohala Coast
Period1/4/171/8/17

Fingerprint

Transparency
Medicine
Vacuum
Parasites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Cite this

Karczewski, K. J., Tatonetti, N. P., Manrai, A. K., Patel, C. J., Brown, C., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research. In PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017 (212679 ed., pp. 117-119). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813207813_0012

Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research. / Karczewski, Konrad J.; Tatonetti, Nicholas P.; Manrai, Arjun K.; Patel, Chirag J.; Brown, Charles; Ioannidis, John P.A.

PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017. 212679. ed. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, 2017. p. 117-119.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Karczewski, KJ, Tatonetti, NP, Manrai, AK, Patel, CJ, Brown, C & Ioannidis, JPA 2017, Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research. in PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017. 212679 edn, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, pp. 117-119, 22nd Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, PSB 2017, Kohala Coast, United States, 1/4/17. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813207813_0012
Karczewski KJ, Tatonetti NP, Manrai AK, Patel CJ, Brown C, Ioannidis JPA. Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research. In PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017. 212679 ed. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd. 2017. p. 117-119 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813207813_0012
Karczewski, Konrad J. ; Tatonetti, Nicholas P. ; Manrai, Arjun K. ; Patel, Chirag J. ; Brown, Charles ; Ioannidis, John P.A. / Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research. PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017. 212679. ed. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, 2017. pp. 117-119
@inproceedings{56da2310742446a59894db83d867d4aa,
title = "Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research",
abstract = "Science is not done in a vacuum – across fields of biomedicine, scientists have built on previous research and used data published in previous papers. A mainstay of scientific inquiry is the publication of one’s research and recognition for this work is given in the form of citations and notoriety--ideally given in proportion to the quality of the work. Academic incentives, however, may encourage individual researchers to prioritize career ambitions over scientific truth. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine published a commentary calling scientists who repurpose data “research parasites” who misuse data generated by others to demonstrate alternative hypotheses1. In our opinion, the concept of data hoarding not only runs contrary to the spirit of, but also hinders scientific progress. Scientific research is meant to seek objective truth, rather than promote a personal agenda, and the only way to do so is through maximum transparency and reproducibility, no matter who is using the data.",
author = "Karczewski, {Konrad J.} and Tatonetti, {Nicholas P.} and Manrai, {Arjun K.} and Patel, {Chirag J.} and Charles Brown and Ioannidis, {John P.A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1142/9789813207813_0012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9789813207813",
pages = "117--119",
booktitle = "PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
address = "Singapore",
edition = "212679",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Methods to ensure the reproducibility of biomedical research

AU - Karczewski, Konrad J.

AU - Tatonetti, Nicholas P.

AU - Manrai, Arjun K.

AU - Patel, Chirag J.

AU - Brown, Charles

AU - Ioannidis, John P.A.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Science is not done in a vacuum – across fields of biomedicine, scientists have built on previous research and used data published in previous papers. A mainstay of scientific inquiry is the publication of one’s research and recognition for this work is given in the form of citations and notoriety--ideally given in proportion to the quality of the work. Academic incentives, however, may encourage individual researchers to prioritize career ambitions over scientific truth. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine published a commentary calling scientists who repurpose data “research parasites” who misuse data generated by others to demonstrate alternative hypotheses1. In our opinion, the concept of data hoarding not only runs contrary to the spirit of, but also hinders scientific progress. Scientific research is meant to seek objective truth, rather than promote a personal agenda, and the only way to do so is through maximum transparency and reproducibility, no matter who is using the data.

AB - Science is not done in a vacuum – across fields of biomedicine, scientists have built on previous research and used data published in previous papers. A mainstay of scientific inquiry is the publication of one’s research and recognition for this work is given in the form of citations and notoriety--ideally given in proportion to the quality of the work. Academic incentives, however, may encourage individual researchers to prioritize career ambitions over scientific truth. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine published a commentary calling scientists who repurpose data “research parasites” who misuse data generated by others to demonstrate alternative hypotheses1. In our opinion, the concept of data hoarding not only runs contrary to the spirit of, but also hinders scientific progress. Scientific research is meant to seek objective truth, rather than promote a personal agenda, and the only way to do so is through maximum transparency and reproducibility, no matter who is using the data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048478417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048478417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/9789813207813_0012

DO - 10.1142/9789813207813_0012

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85048478417

SN - 9789813207813

SP - 117

EP - 119

BT - PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2017

PB - World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd

ER -