Methamphetamine use is associated with increased hospital resource consumption among minimally injured trauma patients.

Jason A. London, Garth H. Utter, Felix Battistella, David Wisner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical effects of methamphetamines (MA) may complicate medical management, potentially increasing resource utilization and hospital costs out of proportion to the patient's severity of injury. We hypothesize that minimally injured (MI) patients testing positive for MA consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. METHODS: Adult trauma patients were identified from 4 years of registry data, which was linked to cost data from our center's financial department. Patients were classified as MI (Injury Severity Score <9) or severely injured (Injury Severity Score >9). Primary outcome was total direct costs for the inpatient hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included direct costs by cost center, contribution margin, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (n = 6,193) of the 10,663 adult patients during the study period were admitted with MI. Nine percent (n = 557) of those tested were positive for MA. Total direct costs were higher in MI MA patients compared to nonusers ($2,998 vs. $2,667, p < 0.001), and users consumed more resources in all 10 cost centers. The same multivariate model showed marginally increased costs with MI alcohol users, but not with MI cocaine users or severely injured MA users. CONCLUSION: MI MA patients consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. Although MA use complicates the initial evaluation of patients, resource consumption was increased for all cost centers representing the entirety of a patients hospital stay, suggesting that the influence of MA is not limited to the initial diagnostic workup. Centers with high proportions of MA users may realize significant losses if compensation contracts are inadequate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-490
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of trauma
Volume66
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Methamphetamine
Wounds and Injuries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Injury Severity Score
Hospital Costs
Contracts
Cocaine
Compensation and Redress
Registries
Inpatients
Alcohols

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Methamphetamine use is associated with increased hospital resource consumption among minimally injured trauma patients. / London, Jason A.; Utter, Garth H.; Battistella, Felix; Wisner, David.

In: The Journal of trauma, Vol. 66, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 485-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee12f3ab50304b80af49b923a7d19d67,
title = "Methamphetamine use is associated with increased hospital resource consumption among minimally injured trauma patients.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The clinical effects of methamphetamines (MA) may complicate medical management, potentially increasing resource utilization and hospital costs out of proportion to the patient's severity of injury. We hypothesize that minimally injured (MI) patients testing positive for MA consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. METHODS: Adult trauma patients were identified from 4 years of registry data, which was linked to cost data from our center's financial department. Patients were classified as MI (Injury Severity Score <9) or severely injured (Injury Severity Score >9). Primary outcome was total direct costs for the inpatient hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included direct costs by cost center, contribution margin, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (n = 6,193) of the 10,663 adult patients during the study period were admitted with MI. Nine percent (n = 557) of those tested were positive for MA. Total direct costs were higher in MI MA patients compared to nonusers ($2,998 vs. $2,667, p < 0.001), and users consumed more resources in all 10 cost centers. The same multivariate model showed marginally increased costs with MI alcohol users, but not with MI cocaine users or severely injured MA users. CONCLUSION: MI MA patients consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. Although MA use complicates the initial evaluation of patients, resource consumption was increased for all cost centers representing the entirety of a patients hospital stay, suggesting that the influence of MA is not limited to the initial diagnostic workup. Centers with high proportions of MA users may realize significant losses if compensation contracts are inadequate.",
author = "London, {Jason A.} and Utter, {Garth H.} and Felix Battistella and David Wisner",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "485--490",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methamphetamine use is associated with increased hospital resource consumption among minimally injured trauma patients.

AU - London, Jason A.

AU - Utter, Garth H.

AU - Battistella, Felix

AU - Wisner, David

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: The clinical effects of methamphetamines (MA) may complicate medical management, potentially increasing resource utilization and hospital costs out of proportion to the patient's severity of injury. We hypothesize that minimally injured (MI) patients testing positive for MA consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. METHODS: Adult trauma patients were identified from 4 years of registry data, which was linked to cost data from our center's financial department. Patients were classified as MI (Injury Severity Score <9) or severely injured (Injury Severity Score >9). Primary outcome was total direct costs for the inpatient hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included direct costs by cost center, contribution margin, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (n = 6,193) of the 10,663 adult patients during the study period were admitted with MI. Nine percent (n = 557) of those tested were positive for MA. Total direct costs were higher in MI MA patients compared to nonusers ($2,998 vs. $2,667, p < 0.001), and users consumed more resources in all 10 cost centers. The same multivariate model showed marginally increased costs with MI alcohol users, but not with MI cocaine users or severely injured MA users. CONCLUSION: MI MA patients consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. Although MA use complicates the initial evaluation of patients, resource consumption was increased for all cost centers representing the entirety of a patients hospital stay, suggesting that the influence of MA is not limited to the initial diagnostic workup. Centers with high proportions of MA users may realize significant losses if compensation contracts are inadequate.

AB - BACKGROUND: The clinical effects of methamphetamines (MA) may complicate medical management, potentially increasing resource utilization and hospital costs out of proportion to the patient's severity of injury. We hypothesize that minimally injured (MI) patients testing positive for MA consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. METHODS: Adult trauma patients were identified from 4 years of registry data, which was linked to cost data from our center's financial department. Patients were classified as MI (Injury Severity Score <9) or severely injured (Injury Severity Score >9). Primary outcome was total direct costs for the inpatient hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included direct costs by cost center, contribution margin, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (n = 6,193) of the 10,663 adult patients during the study period were admitted with MI. Nine percent (n = 557) of those tested were positive for MA. Total direct costs were higher in MI MA patients compared to nonusers ($2,998 vs. $2,667, p < 0.001), and users consumed more resources in all 10 cost centers. The same multivariate model showed marginally increased costs with MI alcohol users, but not with MI cocaine users or severely injured MA users. CONCLUSION: MI MA patients consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. Although MA use complicates the initial evaluation of patients, resource consumption was increased for all cost centers representing the entirety of a patients hospital stay, suggesting that the influence of MA is not limited to the initial diagnostic workup. Centers with high proportions of MA users may realize significant losses if compensation contracts are inadequate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349144898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349144898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19204525

VL - 66

SP - 485

EP - 490

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 2

ER -