Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla

Lorenzo Nardo, Misung Han, Martin Kretschmar, Michele Guindani, Kevin Koch, Thomas Vail, Roland Krug, Thomas M. Link

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength. Methods: Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27–74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p  < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00. Conclusion: MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1609-1616
Number of pages8
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 26 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Hip
Metals
Fats
Arthroplasty
Nonparametric Statistics

Keywords

  • Hip
  • MRI
  • Pain
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Nardo, L., Han, M., Kretschmar, M., Guindani, M., Koch, K., Vail, T., ... Link, T. M. (2015). Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla. Skeletal Radiology, 44(11), 1609-1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5

Metal artifact suppression at the hip : diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla. / Nardo, Lorenzo; Han, Misung; Kretschmar, Martin; Guindani, Michele; Koch, Kevin; Vail, Thomas; Krug, Roland; Link, Thomas M.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 44, No. 11, 26.11.2015, p. 1609-1616.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nardo, L, Han, M, Kretschmar, M, Guindani, M, Koch, K, Vail, T, Krug, R & Link, TM 2015, 'Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla', Skeletal Radiology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1609-1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5
Nardo, Lorenzo ; Han, Misung ; Kretschmar, Martin ; Guindani, Michele ; Koch, Kevin ; Vail, Thomas ; Krug, Roland ; Link, Thomas M. / Metal artifact suppression at the hip : diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 11. pp. 1609-1616.
@article{4898dcc3e8a74e50ac351d0dfccb3006,
title = "Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla",
abstract = "Purpose: This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength. Methods: Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27–74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p  < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00. Conclusion: MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.",
keywords = "Hip, MRI, Pain, Surgery",
author = "Lorenzo Nardo and Misung Han and Martin Kretschmar and Michele Guindani and Kevin Koch and Thomas Vail and Roland Krug and Link, {Thomas M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1609--1616",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metal artifact suppression at the hip

T2 - diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla

AU - Nardo, Lorenzo

AU - Han, Misung

AU - Kretschmar, Martin

AU - Guindani, Michele

AU - Koch, Kevin

AU - Vail, Thomas

AU - Krug, Roland

AU - Link, Thomas M.

PY - 2015/11/26

Y1 - 2015/11/26

N2 - Purpose: This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength. Methods: Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27–74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p  < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00. Conclusion: MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.

AB - Purpose: This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength. Methods: Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27–74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p  < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00. Conclusion: MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.

KW - Hip

KW - MRI

KW - Pain

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942294536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942294536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5

DO - 10.1007/s00256-015-2214-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 26201676

AN - SCOPUS:84942294536

VL - 44

SP - 1609

EP - 1616

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 11

ER -