Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity.

Mary Utter, G. D. Logan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the development of memory-based models of automaticity, it is crucial to specify the nature of the memory representation. Seven experiments with 94 students use a counting task to determine whether a feature (i.e., identity, color, or orientation) is explicitly represented in memory. It is assumed that the degree of transfer to a pattern differing on one feature is determined by that feature's importance in supporting skilled performance. Experiment 1 determined the practice necessary to obtain automaticity. In Experiments 2a, 3a, and 4a, which investigated the nature of the representation after extended practice, changing neither the identity nor color of elements had strong effects on transfer, but changing pattern orientation did impair memory retrieval, thus suggesting that for the counting task, pattern orientation is more important than element identity or color. Experiments 2b, 3b, and 4b replicated these results after limited practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-581
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discrimination
Color
experiment
Students
Discrimination (Psychology)
Numerosity
Discrimination
Experiment
Automaticity
performance
Practice (Psychology)
student
Transfer (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity. / Utter, Mary; Logan, G. D.

In: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.05.1993, p. 561-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13a24208c4fe4e4da1bc8e1c317c3471,
title = "Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity.",
abstract = "In the development of memory-based models of automaticity, it is crucial to specify the nature of the memory representation. Seven experiments with 94 students use a counting task to determine whether a feature (i.e., identity, color, or orientation) is explicitly represented in memory. It is assumed that the degree of transfer to a pattern differing on one feature is determined by that feature's importance in supporting skilled performance. Experiment 1 determined the practice necessary to obtain automaticity. In Experiments 2a, 3a, and 4a, which investigated the nature of the representation after extended practice, changing neither the identity nor color of elements had strong effects on transfer, but changing pattern orientation did impair memory retrieval, thus suggesting that for the counting task, pattern orientation is more important than element identity or color. Experiments 2b, 3b, and 4b replicated these results after limited practice.",
author = "Mary Utter and Logan, {G. D.}",
year = "1993",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.561",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "561--581",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity.

AU - Utter, Mary

AU - Logan, G. D.

PY - 1993/5/1

Y1 - 1993/5/1

N2 - In the development of memory-based models of automaticity, it is crucial to specify the nature of the memory representation. Seven experiments with 94 students use a counting task to determine whether a feature (i.e., identity, color, or orientation) is explicitly represented in memory. It is assumed that the degree of transfer to a pattern differing on one feature is determined by that feature's importance in supporting skilled performance. Experiment 1 determined the practice necessary to obtain automaticity. In Experiments 2a, 3a, and 4a, which investigated the nature of the representation after extended practice, changing neither the identity nor color of elements had strong effects on transfer, but changing pattern orientation did impair memory retrieval, thus suggesting that for the counting task, pattern orientation is more important than element identity or color. Experiments 2b, 3b, and 4b replicated these results after limited practice.

AB - In the development of memory-based models of automaticity, it is crucial to specify the nature of the memory representation. Seven experiments with 94 students use a counting task to determine whether a feature (i.e., identity, color, or orientation) is explicitly represented in memory. It is assumed that the degree of transfer to a pattern differing on one feature is determined by that feature's importance in supporting skilled performance. Experiment 1 determined the practice necessary to obtain automaticity. In Experiments 2a, 3a, and 4a, which investigated the nature of the representation after extended practice, changing neither the identity nor color of elements had strong effects on transfer, but changing pattern orientation did impair memory retrieval, thus suggesting that for the counting task, pattern orientation is more important than element identity or color. Experiments 2b, 3b, and 4b replicated these results after limited practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027600789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027600789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.561

DO - 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.561

M3 - Article

C2 - 8501431

VL - 19

SP - 561

EP - 581

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -