Meeting report: Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing

Pamela J Lein, Paul Locke, Alan Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) is perceived by many stakeholders to be an area in critical need of alternatives to current animal testing protocols and guidelines. To address this need, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Toxicology Program are collaborating in a program called TestSmart DNT, the goals of which are to: (a) develop alternative methodologies for identifying and prioritizing chemicals and exposures that may cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans; (b) develop the policies for incorporating DNT alternatives into regulatory decision making; and (c) identify opportunities for reducing, refining, or replacing the use of animals in DNT. The first TestSmart DNT workshop was an open registration meeting held 13-15 March 2006 in Reston, Virginia. The primary objective was to bring together stakeholders (test developers, test users, regulators, and advocates for children's health, animal welfare, and environmental health) and individuals representing diverse disciplines (developmental neurobiology, toxicology, policy, and regulatory science) from around the world to share information and concerns relating to the science and policy of DNT. Individual presentations are available at the CAAT TestSmart website. This report provides a synthesis of workgroup discussions and recommendations for future directions and priorities, which include initiating a systematic evaluation of alternative models and technologies, developing a framework for the creation of an open database to catalog DNT data, and devising a strategy for harmonizing the validation process across international jurisdictional borders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)764-768
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume115
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Animal Testing Alternatives
Toxicology
Testing
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Animal Welfare
Animals
Neurobiology
Environmental Health
animal
Decision Making
toxicology
Databases
Guidelines
Technology
Education
stakeholder
animal welfare
child health
neurotoxicity
Health

Keywords

  • Alternatives
  • Developmental neurotoxicity testing
  • Humane science
  • In vitro models
  • Policy
  • Regulatory acceptance
  • Screening
  • TestSmart
  • The 3Rs
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Meeting report : Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing. / Lein, Pamela J; Locke, Paul; Goldberg, Alan.

In: Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 115, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 764-768.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lein, Pamela J ; Locke, Paul ; Goldberg, Alan. / Meeting report : Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing. In: Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007 ; Vol. 115, No. 5. pp. 764-768.
@article{0d712ba9c576479c8482f1cd016edd57,
title = "Meeting report: Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing",
abstract = "Developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) is perceived by many stakeholders to be an area in critical need of alternatives to current animal testing protocols and guidelines. To address this need, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Toxicology Program are collaborating in a program called TestSmart DNT, the goals of which are to: (a) develop alternative methodologies for identifying and prioritizing chemicals and exposures that may cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans; (b) develop the policies for incorporating DNT alternatives into regulatory decision making; and (c) identify opportunities for reducing, refining, or replacing the use of animals in DNT. The first TestSmart DNT workshop was an open registration meeting held 13-15 March 2006 in Reston, Virginia. The primary objective was to bring together stakeholders (test developers, test users, regulators, and advocates for children's health, animal welfare, and environmental health) and individuals representing diverse disciplines (developmental neurobiology, toxicology, policy, and regulatory science) from around the world to share information and concerns relating to the science and policy of DNT. Individual presentations are available at the CAAT TestSmart website. This report provides a synthesis of workgroup discussions and recommendations for future directions and priorities, which include initiating a systematic evaluation of alternative models and technologies, developing a framework for the creation of an open database to catalog DNT data, and devising a strategy for harmonizing the validation process across international jurisdictional borders.",
keywords = "Alternatives, Developmental neurotoxicity testing, Humane science, In vitro models, Policy, Regulatory acceptance, Screening, TestSmart, The 3Rs, Validation",
author = "Lein, {Pamela J} and Paul Locke and Alan Goldberg",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1289/ehp.9841",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "764--768",
journal = "Environmental Health Perspectives",
issn = "0091-6765",
publisher = "Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meeting report

T2 - Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing

AU - Lein, Pamela J

AU - Locke, Paul

AU - Goldberg, Alan

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) is perceived by many stakeholders to be an area in critical need of alternatives to current animal testing protocols and guidelines. To address this need, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Toxicology Program are collaborating in a program called TestSmart DNT, the goals of which are to: (a) develop alternative methodologies for identifying and prioritizing chemicals and exposures that may cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans; (b) develop the policies for incorporating DNT alternatives into regulatory decision making; and (c) identify opportunities for reducing, refining, or replacing the use of animals in DNT. The first TestSmart DNT workshop was an open registration meeting held 13-15 March 2006 in Reston, Virginia. The primary objective was to bring together stakeholders (test developers, test users, regulators, and advocates for children's health, animal welfare, and environmental health) and individuals representing diverse disciplines (developmental neurobiology, toxicology, policy, and regulatory science) from around the world to share information and concerns relating to the science and policy of DNT. Individual presentations are available at the CAAT TestSmart website. This report provides a synthesis of workgroup discussions and recommendations for future directions and priorities, which include initiating a systematic evaluation of alternative models and technologies, developing a framework for the creation of an open database to catalog DNT data, and devising a strategy for harmonizing the validation process across international jurisdictional borders.

AB - Developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) is perceived by many stakeholders to be an area in critical need of alternatives to current animal testing protocols and guidelines. To address this need, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Toxicology Program are collaborating in a program called TestSmart DNT, the goals of which are to: (a) develop alternative methodologies for identifying and prioritizing chemicals and exposures that may cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans; (b) develop the policies for incorporating DNT alternatives into regulatory decision making; and (c) identify opportunities for reducing, refining, or replacing the use of animals in DNT. The first TestSmart DNT workshop was an open registration meeting held 13-15 March 2006 in Reston, Virginia. The primary objective was to bring together stakeholders (test developers, test users, regulators, and advocates for children's health, animal welfare, and environmental health) and individuals representing diverse disciplines (developmental neurobiology, toxicology, policy, and regulatory science) from around the world to share information and concerns relating to the science and policy of DNT. Individual presentations are available at the CAAT TestSmart website. This report provides a synthesis of workgroup discussions and recommendations for future directions and priorities, which include initiating a systematic evaluation of alternative models and technologies, developing a framework for the creation of an open database to catalog DNT data, and devising a strategy for harmonizing the validation process across international jurisdictional borders.

KW - Alternatives

KW - Developmental neurotoxicity testing

KW - Humane science

KW - In vitro models

KW - Policy

KW - Regulatory acceptance

KW - Screening

KW - TestSmart

KW - The 3Rs

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249100959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249100959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1289/ehp.9841

DO - 10.1289/ehp.9841

M3 - Article

C2 - 17520065

AN - SCOPUS:34249100959

VL - 115

SP - 764

EP - 768

JO - Environmental Health Perspectives

JF - Environmental Health Perspectives

SN - 0091-6765

IS - 5

ER -