Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records: 2011–2016

Michael V. Boland, Thomas S. Hwang, Michele C Lim, Jessica L. Peterson, Flora Lum, Aaron Y. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists’ rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design: Administrative database study. Participants: Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods: Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results: In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOphthalmology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Medicare
Motivation
Optometry
Ophthalmologists
Information Storage and Retrieval
Otolaryngology
Urology
Ophthalmology
Dermatology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records : 2011–2016. / Boland, Michael V.; Hwang, Thomas S.; Lim, Michele C; Peterson, Jessica L.; Lum, Flora; Lee, Aaron Y.

In: Ophthalmology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boland, Michael V. ; Hwang, Thomas S. ; Lim, Michele C ; Peterson, Jessica L. ; Lum, Flora ; Lee, Aaron Y. / Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records : 2011–2016. In: Ophthalmology. 2019.
@article{56a9954f5bea45f382f9100f65f70b82,
title = "Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records: 2011–2016",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists’ rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design: Administrative database study. Participants: Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods: Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results: In the peak year of participation, 51.6{\%} of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1{\%} of optometrists, 50.2{\%} of dermatologists, 54.5{\%} of otolaryngologists, and 64.4{\%} of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50{\%} of attestations by ophthalmologists.",
author = "Boland, {Michael V.} and Hwang, {Thomas S.} and Lim, {Michele C} and Peterson, {Jessica L.} and Flora Lum and Lee, {Aaron Y.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.030",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records

T2 - 2011–2016

AU - Boland, Michael V.

AU - Hwang, Thomas S.

AU - Lim, Michele C

AU - Peterson, Jessica L.

AU - Lum, Flora

AU - Lee, Aaron Y.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists’ rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design: Administrative database study. Participants: Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods: Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results: In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.

AB - Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists’ rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties. Design: Administrative database study. Participants: Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Methods: Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor. Results: In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062272271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062272271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.030

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 30768941

AN - SCOPUS:85062272271

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

ER -