Medical scientists and health news reporting: A case of miscommunication

Miriam Shuchman, Michael S Wilkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The public is poorly served by the coverage of medical science in the general press. Scientists and physicians blame the press, claiming that journalists are careless in their reporting, subject to competitive pressures, and ignorant of the scientific process. Journalists accuse the medical community of limiting access to information and erecting barriers to the public dissemination of medical research. In many areas of health news reporting, the underlying problem is an interactive dynamic that involves scientists and journalists. Both parties share the responsibility for accurate communication to the public. This report suggests ways to improve health news reporting, focusing on four problem areas: sensationalism, biases and conflicts of interest, lack of follow-up, and stories that are not covered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)976-982
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume126
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jun 15 1997

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
Access to Information
Health
Biomedical Research
Communication
Physicians
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Medical scientists and health news reporting : A case of miscommunication. / Shuchman, Miriam; Wilkes, Michael S.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 126, No. 12, 15.06.1997, p. 976-982.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{04b3a28fe2824abfb7c78f4388e4a12a,
title = "Medical scientists and health news reporting: A case of miscommunication",
abstract = "The public is poorly served by the coverage of medical science in the general press. Scientists and physicians blame the press, claiming that journalists are careless in their reporting, subject to competitive pressures, and ignorant of the scientific process. Journalists accuse the medical community of limiting access to information and erecting barriers to the public dissemination of medical research. In many areas of health news reporting, the underlying problem is an interactive dynamic that involves scientists and journalists. Both parties share the responsibility for accurate communication to the public. This report suggests ways to improve health news reporting, focusing on four problem areas: sensationalism, biases and conflicts of interest, lack of follow-up, and stories that are not covered.",
author = "Miriam Shuchman and Wilkes, {Michael S}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "976--982",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical scientists and health news reporting

T2 - A case of miscommunication

AU - Shuchman, Miriam

AU - Wilkes, Michael S

PY - 1997/6/15

Y1 - 1997/6/15

N2 - The public is poorly served by the coverage of medical science in the general press. Scientists and physicians blame the press, claiming that journalists are careless in their reporting, subject to competitive pressures, and ignorant of the scientific process. Journalists accuse the medical community of limiting access to information and erecting barriers to the public dissemination of medical research. In many areas of health news reporting, the underlying problem is an interactive dynamic that involves scientists and journalists. Both parties share the responsibility for accurate communication to the public. This report suggests ways to improve health news reporting, focusing on four problem areas: sensationalism, biases and conflicts of interest, lack of follow-up, and stories that are not covered.

AB - The public is poorly served by the coverage of medical science in the general press. Scientists and physicians blame the press, claiming that journalists are careless in their reporting, subject to competitive pressures, and ignorant of the scientific process. Journalists accuse the medical community of limiting access to information and erecting barriers to the public dissemination of medical research. In many areas of health news reporting, the underlying problem is an interactive dynamic that involves scientists and journalists. Both parties share the responsibility for accurate communication to the public. This report suggests ways to improve health news reporting, focusing on four problem areas: sensationalism, biases and conflicts of interest, lack of follow-up, and stories that are not covered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030920036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030920036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9182476

AN - SCOPUS:0030920036

VL - 126

SP - 976

EP - 982

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 12

ER -