Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Heejung Bang, Hongwei Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a type of economic evaluation that examines the costs and health outcomes of alternative strategies and has been extensively applied in health sciences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the additional cost of one unit of outcome gained by one strategy compared with another, has become a popular methodology in CEA. Despite its popularity, limited attention has been paid to summary measures other than the mean for summarizing cost as well as effectiveness in the context of CEA. Although some apparent advantages of other central tendency measures, such as median for cost data that are often highly skewed, are well understood, thus far, the median has rarely been considered in the ICER. In this paper, we propose the median-based ICER, along with inferential procedures, and suggest that mean-and median-based ICERs be considered together as complementary tools in CEA for informed decision making, acknowledging the pros and cons of each. If the mean-and median-based CEAs are concordant, we may feel reasonably confident about the cost-effectiveness of an intervention, but if they provide different results, our confidence may need to be adjusted accordingly, pending further evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-442
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Statistical Theory and Practice
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Cost-effectiveness
Costs
Health
Confidence
Decision Making
Economics
Unit
Methodology
Alternatives
Evaluation

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Cost-effectiveness plane
  • Mean cost
  • Median cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). / Bang, Heejung; Zhao, Hongwei.

In: Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.09.2012, p. 428-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{00935454bf9d4142a2ea2a55f6d70aaf,
title = "Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)",
abstract = "Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a type of economic evaluation that examines the costs and health outcomes of alternative strategies and has been extensively applied in health sciences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the additional cost of one unit of outcome gained by one strategy compared with another, has become a popular methodology in CEA. Despite its popularity, limited attention has been paid to summary measures other than the mean for summarizing cost as well as effectiveness in the context of CEA. Although some apparent advantages of other central tendency measures, such as median for cost data that are often highly skewed, are well understood, thus far, the median has rarely been considered in the ICER. In this paper, we propose the median-based ICER, along with inferential procedures, and suggest that mean-and median-based ICERs be considered together as complementary tools in CEA for informed decision making, acknowledging the pros and cons of each. If the mean-and median-based CEAs are concordant, we may feel reasonably confident about the cost-effectiveness of an intervention, but if they provide different results, our confidence may need to be adjusted accordingly, pending further evidence.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost-effectiveness plane, Mean cost, Median cost",
author = "Heejung Bang and Hongwei Zhao",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15598608.2012.695571",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "428--442",
journal = "Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice",
issn = "1559-8608",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

AU - Bang, Heejung

AU - Zhao, Hongwei

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a type of economic evaluation that examines the costs and health outcomes of alternative strategies and has been extensively applied in health sciences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the additional cost of one unit of outcome gained by one strategy compared with another, has become a popular methodology in CEA. Despite its popularity, limited attention has been paid to summary measures other than the mean for summarizing cost as well as effectiveness in the context of CEA. Although some apparent advantages of other central tendency measures, such as median for cost data that are often highly skewed, are well understood, thus far, the median has rarely been considered in the ICER. In this paper, we propose the median-based ICER, along with inferential procedures, and suggest that mean-and median-based ICERs be considered together as complementary tools in CEA for informed decision making, acknowledging the pros and cons of each. If the mean-and median-based CEAs are concordant, we may feel reasonably confident about the cost-effectiveness of an intervention, but if they provide different results, our confidence may need to be adjusted accordingly, pending further evidence.

AB - Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a type of economic evaluation that examines the costs and health outcomes of alternative strategies and has been extensively applied in health sciences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the additional cost of one unit of outcome gained by one strategy compared with another, has become a popular methodology in CEA. Despite its popularity, limited attention has been paid to summary measures other than the mean for summarizing cost as well as effectiveness in the context of CEA. Although some apparent advantages of other central tendency measures, such as median for cost data that are often highly skewed, are well understood, thus far, the median has rarely been considered in the ICER. In this paper, we propose the median-based ICER, along with inferential procedures, and suggest that mean-and median-based ICERs be considered together as complementary tools in CEA for informed decision making, acknowledging the pros and cons of each. If the mean-and median-based CEAs are concordant, we may feel reasonably confident about the cost-effectiveness of an intervention, but if they provide different results, our confidence may need to be adjusted accordingly, pending further evidence.

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Cost-effectiveness plane

KW - Mean cost

KW - Median cost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865232600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865232600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15598608.2012.695571

DO - 10.1080/15598608.2012.695571

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865232600

VL - 6

SP - 428

EP - 442

JO - Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

JF - Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

SN - 1559-8608

IS - 3

ER -