Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims

S. M. Asch, E. M. Sloss, C. Hogan, R. H. Brook, Richard L Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Continuing changes in the health care delivery system make it essential to monitor underuse of needed care, even for relatively well-insured populations. Traditional approaches to measuring underuse have relied on patient surveys and chart reviews, which are expensive, or simple single-condition claims-based indicators, which are not clinically convincing. Objective: To develop a comprehensive, low-cost system for measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly patients using inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims. Design: A 7-member, multispecialty expert physician panel was assembled and used a modified Delphi method to develop clinically detailed underuse indicators likely to be associated with avoidable poor outcomes for 15 common acute and chronic medical and surgical conditions. An automated system was developed to calculate the indicators using administrative data. Setting and Subjects: A total of 345253 randomly selected elderly US Medicare beneficiaries in 1994-1996. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of beneficiaries receiving care, stratified by indicators of necessary care (n = 40, including 3 for preventive care), and avoidable outcomes (n = 6). Results: For 16 of 40 necessary care indicators (including preventive care indicators), beneficiaries received the indicated care less than two thirds of the time. Of all indicators, African Americans scored significantly worse than whites on 16 and better on 2; residents of poverty areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 17 and higher on 1; residents of federally defined Health Professional Shortage Areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 16 and higher on none (P<.05 for all). Conclusions: This claims-based method detected substantial underuse problems likely to result in negative outcomes in elderly populations. Significantly more underuse problems were detected in populations known to receive less-than-average medical care. The method can serve as a reliable, valid tool for monitoring trends in underuse of needed care for older patients and for comparing care across health care plans and geographic areas based on claims data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2325-2333
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume284
Issue number18
StatePublished - Nov 8 2000

Fingerprint

Medicare
Inpatients
Preventive Medicine
Outpatients
Delivery of Health Care
Population
Poverty Areas
African Americans
Patient Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims. / Asch, S. M.; Sloss, E. M.; Hogan, C.; Brook, R. H.; Kravitz, Richard L.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 284, No. 18, 08.11.2000, p. 2325-2333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40be4db56f084c1f925002fa51a98fb9,
title = "Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims",
abstract = "Context: Continuing changes in the health care delivery system make it essential to monitor underuse of needed care, even for relatively well-insured populations. Traditional approaches to measuring underuse have relied on patient surveys and chart reviews, which are expensive, or simple single-condition claims-based indicators, which are not clinically convincing. Objective: To develop a comprehensive, low-cost system for measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly patients using inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims. Design: A 7-member, multispecialty expert physician panel was assembled and used a modified Delphi method to develop clinically detailed underuse indicators likely to be associated with avoidable poor outcomes for 15 common acute and chronic medical and surgical conditions. An automated system was developed to calculate the indicators using administrative data. Setting and Subjects: A total of 345253 randomly selected elderly US Medicare beneficiaries in 1994-1996. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of beneficiaries receiving care, stratified by indicators of necessary care (n = 40, including 3 for preventive care), and avoidable outcomes (n = 6). Results: For 16 of 40 necessary care indicators (including preventive care indicators), beneficiaries received the indicated care less than two thirds of the time. Of all indicators, African Americans scored significantly worse than whites on 16 and better on 2; residents of poverty areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 17 and higher on 1; residents of federally defined Health Professional Shortage Areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 16 and higher on none (P<.05 for all). Conclusions: This claims-based method detected substantial underuse problems likely to result in negative outcomes in elderly populations. Significantly more underuse problems were detected in populations known to receive less-than-average medical care. The method can serve as a reliable, valid tool for monitoring trends in underuse of needed care for older patients and for comparing care across health care plans and geographic areas based on claims data.",
author = "Asch, {S. M.} and Sloss, {E. M.} and C. Hogan and Brook, {R. H.} and Kravitz, {Richard L}",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
day = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "284",
pages = "2325--2333",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims

AU - Asch, S. M.

AU - Sloss, E. M.

AU - Hogan, C.

AU - Brook, R. H.

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

PY - 2000/11/8

Y1 - 2000/11/8

N2 - Context: Continuing changes in the health care delivery system make it essential to monitor underuse of needed care, even for relatively well-insured populations. Traditional approaches to measuring underuse have relied on patient surveys and chart reviews, which are expensive, or simple single-condition claims-based indicators, which are not clinically convincing. Objective: To develop a comprehensive, low-cost system for measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly patients using inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims. Design: A 7-member, multispecialty expert physician panel was assembled and used a modified Delphi method to develop clinically detailed underuse indicators likely to be associated with avoidable poor outcomes for 15 common acute and chronic medical and surgical conditions. An automated system was developed to calculate the indicators using administrative data. Setting and Subjects: A total of 345253 randomly selected elderly US Medicare beneficiaries in 1994-1996. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of beneficiaries receiving care, stratified by indicators of necessary care (n = 40, including 3 for preventive care), and avoidable outcomes (n = 6). Results: For 16 of 40 necessary care indicators (including preventive care indicators), beneficiaries received the indicated care less than two thirds of the time. Of all indicators, African Americans scored significantly worse than whites on 16 and better on 2; residents of poverty areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 17 and higher on 1; residents of federally defined Health Professional Shortage Areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 16 and higher on none (P<.05 for all). Conclusions: This claims-based method detected substantial underuse problems likely to result in negative outcomes in elderly populations. Significantly more underuse problems were detected in populations known to receive less-than-average medical care. The method can serve as a reliable, valid tool for monitoring trends in underuse of needed care for older patients and for comparing care across health care plans and geographic areas based on claims data.

AB - Context: Continuing changes in the health care delivery system make it essential to monitor underuse of needed care, even for relatively well-insured populations. Traditional approaches to measuring underuse have relied on patient surveys and chart reviews, which are expensive, or simple single-condition claims-based indicators, which are not clinically convincing. Objective: To develop a comprehensive, low-cost system for measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly patients using inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims. Design: A 7-member, multispecialty expert physician panel was assembled and used a modified Delphi method to develop clinically detailed underuse indicators likely to be associated with avoidable poor outcomes for 15 common acute and chronic medical and surgical conditions. An automated system was developed to calculate the indicators using administrative data. Setting and Subjects: A total of 345253 randomly selected elderly US Medicare beneficiaries in 1994-1996. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of beneficiaries receiving care, stratified by indicators of necessary care (n = 40, including 3 for preventive care), and avoidable outcomes (n = 6). Results: For 16 of 40 necessary care indicators (including preventive care indicators), beneficiaries received the indicated care less than two thirds of the time. Of all indicators, African Americans scored significantly worse than whites on 16 and better on 2; residents of poverty areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 17 and higher on 1; residents of federally defined Health Professional Shortage Areas scored significantly lower than nonresidents on 16 and higher on none (P<.05 for all). Conclusions: This claims-based method detected substantial underuse problems likely to result in negative outcomes in elderly populations. Significantly more underuse problems were detected in populations known to receive less-than-average medical care. The method can serve as a reliable, valid tool for monitoring trends in underuse of needed care for older patients and for comparing care across health care plans and geographic areas based on claims data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034623607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034623607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11066182

AN - SCOPUS:0034623607

VL - 284

SP - 2325

EP - 2333

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 18

ER -