Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters

Allen C. Lim, Eric P. Homestead, Andrew G. Edwards, Todd C. Carver, Rodger Kram, William C. Byrnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a protocol for isolating changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances from field-based measures of power and velocity during level bicycling. Methods: We assessed the effect of body position (hands on brake hoods vs drops) and tire pressure changes (414 vs 828 κPa) on aerodynamic and rolling resistances by measuring the power (Pext)-versus-speed (V) relationship using commercially available bicycle-mounted power meters. Measurements were obtained using standard road bicycles in calm wind (<1.0 m•s-1) conditions at constant velocities (acceleration <0.5 m•s-2) on a flat 200-m section of a smooth asphalt road. For each experimental condition, experienced road cyclists rode in 50-W increments from 100 to 300 W for women (n = 2) or 100 to 400 W for men (n = 6). Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was calculated as the slope of a linear plot of tractive resistance (RT = power/velocity) versus velocity squared. Rolling resistance (Rr) was calculated as the intercept of this relationship. Results: Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) while riding on the brake hoods compared with the drops (mean ± SD: 0.175 ± 0.025 vs 0.155 ± 0.03 N•V). Rolling resistance was significantly greater at 60 psi compared with 120 psi (5.575 ± 0.695 vs 4.215 ± 0.815 N). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that commercially available power meters are sensitive enough to independently detect the changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances associated with modest changes in body position and substantial changes in tire pressure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)853-860
Number of pages8
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

asphalt
Bicycling
Pressure
Hand

Keywords

  • Drag coefficient
  • power tap
  • srm
  • testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters. / Lim, Allen C.; Homestead, Eric P.; Edwards, Andrew G.; Carver, Todd C.; Kram, Rodger; Byrnes, William C.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 43, No. 5, 01.05.2011, p. 853-860.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lim, Allen C. ; Homestead, Eric P. ; Edwards, Andrew G. ; Carver, Todd C. ; Kram, Rodger ; Byrnes, William C. / Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 5. pp. 853-860.
@article{2f0f4d05548047cab7575cf2482a5a49,
title = "Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop a protocol for isolating changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances from field-based measures of power and velocity during level bicycling. Methods: We assessed the effect of body position (hands on brake hoods vs drops) and tire pressure changes (414 vs 828 κPa) on aerodynamic and rolling resistances by measuring the power (Pext)-versus-speed (V) relationship using commercially available bicycle-mounted power meters. Measurements were obtained using standard road bicycles in calm wind (<1.0 m•s-1) conditions at constant velocities (acceleration <0.5 m•s-2) on a flat 200-m section of a smooth asphalt road. For each experimental condition, experienced road cyclists rode in 50-W increments from 100 to 300 W for women (n = 2) or 100 to 400 W for men (n = 6). Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was calculated as the slope of a linear plot of tractive resistance (RT = power/velocity) versus velocity squared. Rolling resistance (Rr) was calculated as the intercept of this relationship. Results: Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) while riding on the brake hoods compared with the drops (mean ± SD: 0.175 ± 0.025 vs 0.155 ± 0.03 N•V). Rolling resistance was significantly greater at 60 psi compared with 120 psi (5.575 ± 0.695 vs 4.215 ± 0.815 N). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that commercially available power meters are sensitive enough to independently detect the changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances associated with modest changes in body position and substantial changes in tire pressure.",
keywords = "Drag coefficient, power tap, srm, testing",
author = "Lim, {Allen C.} and Homestead, {Eric P.} and Edwards, {Andrew G.} and Carver, {Todd C.} and Rodger Kram and Byrnes, {William C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fcb140",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "853--860",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters

AU - Lim, Allen C.

AU - Homestead, Eric P.

AU - Edwards, Andrew G.

AU - Carver, Todd C.

AU - Kram, Rodger

AU - Byrnes, William C.

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To develop a protocol for isolating changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances from field-based measures of power and velocity during level bicycling. Methods: We assessed the effect of body position (hands on brake hoods vs drops) and tire pressure changes (414 vs 828 κPa) on aerodynamic and rolling resistances by measuring the power (Pext)-versus-speed (V) relationship using commercially available bicycle-mounted power meters. Measurements were obtained using standard road bicycles in calm wind (<1.0 m•s-1) conditions at constant velocities (acceleration <0.5 m•s-2) on a flat 200-m section of a smooth asphalt road. For each experimental condition, experienced road cyclists rode in 50-W increments from 100 to 300 W for women (n = 2) or 100 to 400 W for men (n = 6). Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was calculated as the slope of a linear plot of tractive resistance (RT = power/velocity) versus velocity squared. Rolling resistance (Rr) was calculated as the intercept of this relationship. Results: Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) while riding on the brake hoods compared with the drops (mean ± SD: 0.175 ± 0.025 vs 0.155 ± 0.03 N•V). Rolling resistance was significantly greater at 60 psi compared with 120 psi (5.575 ± 0.695 vs 4.215 ± 0.815 N). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that commercially available power meters are sensitive enough to independently detect the changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances associated with modest changes in body position and substantial changes in tire pressure.

AB - Purpose: To develop a protocol for isolating changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances from field-based measures of power and velocity during level bicycling. Methods: We assessed the effect of body position (hands on brake hoods vs drops) and tire pressure changes (414 vs 828 κPa) on aerodynamic and rolling resistances by measuring the power (Pext)-versus-speed (V) relationship using commercially available bicycle-mounted power meters. Measurements were obtained using standard road bicycles in calm wind (<1.0 m•s-1) conditions at constant velocities (acceleration <0.5 m•s-2) on a flat 200-m section of a smooth asphalt road. For each experimental condition, experienced road cyclists rode in 50-W increments from 100 to 300 W for women (n = 2) or 100 to 400 W for men (n = 6). Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was calculated as the slope of a linear plot of tractive resistance (RT = power/velocity) versus velocity squared. Rolling resistance (Rr) was calculated as the intercept of this relationship. Results: Aerodynamic resistance per velocity squared (k) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) while riding on the brake hoods compared with the drops (mean ± SD: 0.175 ± 0.025 vs 0.155 ± 0.03 N•V). Rolling resistance was significantly greater at 60 psi compared with 120 psi (5.575 ± 0.695 vs 4.215 ± 0.815 N). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that commercially available power meters are sensitive enough to independently detect the changes in aerodynamic and rolling resistances associated with modest changes in body position and substantial changes in tire pressure.

KW - Drag coefficient

KW - power tap

KW - srm

KW - testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955466401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955466401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fcb140

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fcb140

M3 - Article

C2 - 20881880

AN - SCOPUS:79955466401

VL - 43

SP - 853

EP - 860

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 5

ER -