Measuring and averting underuse of necessary cardiac procedures

a summary of results and future directions.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attempting to explain the marked variation in utilization of medical procedures has vexed health policy analysts for nearly three decades. Most health services research to date has been directed at identifying and reducing excessive utilization. Little attention has been given to underuse of care. THE LOS ANGELES CARDIAC UNDERUSE PROJECT OVERVIEW: A research group at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), performed two separate, published studies seeking to measure underuse of coronary angiography and coronary artery revascu-larization (bypass surgery and angioplasty), two critical links in the chain of care leading from initial diagnosis of coronary artery disease to definitive treatment. In each study, the necessity criteria developed by the panel were used to identify patients needing an invasive procedure. RESULTS: Within this population of patients (sampled predominantly from public hospitals), substantial underuse of clinically necessary coronary angiography (41% without refusers) and revascularization (23% without refusers) was detected. In this select population of patients, receiving a necessary revascularization procedure appeared to both reduce the risk of death and improve quality of life. DISCUSSION: Despite limitations of the method, detection of underuse is feasible, valid, and affordable in the context of overall health care expenditures. Moreover, the case for implementing "underuse prevention" systems is increasingly compelling. Measuring and disseminating data on underuse of expensive but highly beneficial procedures would provide health care consumers (patients and employers) with useful information and enable health care providers to develop quality improvement strategies aimed at rational use of health care resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-276
Number of pages9
JournalThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
Volume23
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Los Angeles
Coronary Angiography
Delivery of Health Care
Health Resources
Health Services Research
Public Hospitals
Health Expenditures
Health Policy
Quality Improvement
Angioplasty
Health Personnel
Population
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Vessels
Quality of Life
Direction compound
Research
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{32a10f2c2d444decaa705c56c76dd740,
title = "Measuring and averting underuse of necessary cardiac procedures: a summary of results and future directions.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Attempting to explain the marked variation in utilization of medical procedures has vexed health policy analysts for nearly three decades. Most health services research to date has been directed at identifying and reducing excessive utilization. Little attention has been given to underuse of care. THE LOS ANGELES CARDIAC UNDERUSE PROJECT OVERVIEW: A research group at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), performed two separate, published studies seeking to measure underuse of coronary angiography and coronary artery revascu-larization (bypass surgery and angioplasty), two critical links in the chain of care leading from initial diagnosis of coronary artery disease to definitive treatment. In each study, the necessity criteria developed by the panel were used to identify patients needing an invasive procedure. RESULTS: Within this population of patients (sampled predominantly from public hospitals), substantial underuse of clinically necessary coronary angiography (41{\%} without refusers) and revascularization (23{\%} without refusers) was detected. In this select population of patients, receiving a necessary revascularization procedure appeared to both reduce the risk of death and improve quality of life. DISCUSSION: Despite limitations of the method, detection of underuse is feasible, valid, and affordable in the context of overall health care expenditures. Moreover, the case for implementing {"}underuse prevention{"} systems is increasingly compelling. Measuring and disseminating data on underuse of expensive but highly beneficial procedures would provide health care consumers (patients and employers) with useful information and enable health care providers to develop quality improvement strategies aimed at rational use of health care resources.",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L} and M. Laouri",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "268--276",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring and averting underuse of necessary cardiac procedures

T2 - a summary of results and future directions.

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Laouri, M.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - BACKGROUND: Attempting to explain the marked variation in utilization of medical procedures has vexed health policy analysts for nearly three decades. Most health services research to date has been directed at identifying and reducing excessive utilization. Little attention has been given to underuse of care. THE LOS ANGELES CARDIAC UNDERUSE PROJECT OVERVIEW: A research group at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), performed two separate, published studies seeking to measure underuse of coronary angiography and coronary artery revascu-larization (bypass surgery and angioplasty), two critical links in the chain of care leading from initial diagnosis of coronary artery disease to definitive treatment. In each study, the necessity criteria developed by the panel were used to identify patients needing an invasive procedure. RESULTS: Within this population of patients (sampled predominantly from public hospitals), substantial underuse of clinically necessary coronary angiography (41% without refusers) and revascularization (23% without refusers) was detected. In this select population of patients, receiving a necessary revascularization procedure appeared to both reduce the risk of death and improve quality of life. DISCUSSION: Despite limitations of the method, detection of underuse is feasible, valid, and affordable in the context of overall health care expenditures. Moreover, the case for implementing "underuse prevention" systems is increasingly compelling. Measuring and disseminating data on underuse of expensive but highly beneficial procedures would provide health care consumers (patients and employers) with useful information and enable health care providers to develop quality improvement strategies aimed at rational use of health care resources.

AB - BACKGROUND: Attempting to explain the marked variation in utilization of medical procedures has vexed health policy analysts for nearly three decades. Most health services research to date has been directed at identifying and reducing excessive utilization. Little attention has been given to underuse of care. THE LOS ANGELES CARDIAC UNDERUSE PROJECT OVERVIEW: A research group at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), performed two separate, published studies seeking to measure underuse of coronary angiography and coronary artery revascu-larization (bypass surgery and angioplasty), two critical links in the chain of care leading from initial diagnosis of coronary artery disease to definitive treatment. In each study, the necessity criteria developed by the panel were used to identify patients needing an invasive procedure. RESULTS: Within this population of patients (sampled predominantly from public hospitals), substantial underuse of clinically necessary coronary angiography (41% without refusers) and revascularization (23% without refusers) was detected. In this select population of patients, receiving a necessary revascularization procedure appeared to both reduce the risk of death and improve quality of life. DISCUSSION: Despite limitations of the method, detection of underuse is feasible, valid, and affordable in the context of overall health care expenditures. Moreover, the case for implementing "underuse prevention" systems is increasingly compelling. Measuring and disseminating data on underuse of expensive but highly beneficial procedures would provide health care consumers (patients and employers) with useful information and enable health care providers to develop quality improvement strategies aimed at rational use of health care resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031131944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031131944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 268

EP - 276

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 5

ER -