Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology

Otto Pedraza, Dan M Mungas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The measurement of cognitive abilities across diverse cultural, racial, and ethnic groups has a contentious history, with broad political, legal, economic, and ethical repercussions. Advances in psychometric methods and converging scientific ideas about genetic variation afford new tools and theoretical contexts to move beyond the reflective analysis of between-group test score discrepancies. Neuropsychology is poised to benefit from these advances to cultivate a richer understanding of the factors that underlie cognitive test score disparities. To this end, the present article considers several topics relevant to the measurement of cognitive abilities across groups from diverse ancestral origins, including fairness and bias, equivalence, diagnostic validity, item response theory, and differential item functioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-193
Number of pages10
JournalNeuropsychology Review
Volume18
Issue number3 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Neuropsychology
Aptitude
Ethnic Groups
Psychometrics
History
Economics

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural neuropsychology
  • Differential item functioning
  • Ethnicity
  • Genomics
  • Measurement
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology. / Pedraza, Otto; Mungas, Dan M.

In: Neuropsychology Review, Vol. 18, No. 3 SPEC. ISS., 09.2008, p. 184-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pedraza, Otto ; Mungas, Dan M. / Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology. In: Neuropsychology Review. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 3 SPEC. ISS. pp. 184-193.
@article{67f3d9a0e32046cba42d318ded9a0016,
title = "Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology",
abstract = "The measurement of cognitive abilities across diverse cultural, racial, and ethnic groups has a contentious history, with broad political, legal, economic, and ethical repercussions. Advances in psychometric methods and converging scientific ideas about genetic variation afford new tools and theoretical contexts to move beyond the reflective analysis of between-group test score discrepancies. Neuropsychology is poised to benefit from these advances to cultivate a richer understanding of the factors that underlie cognitive test score disparities. To this end, the present article considers several topics relevant to the measurement of cognitive abilities across groups from diverse ancestral origins, including fairness and bias, equivalence, diagnostic validity, item response theory, and differential item functioning.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural neuropsychology, Differential item functioning, Ethnicity, Genomics, Measurement, Race",
author = "Otto Pedraza and Mungas, {Dan M}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11065-008-9067-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "184--193",
journal = "Neuropsychology Review",
issn = "1040-7308",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology

AU - Pedraza, Otto

AU - Mungas, Dan M

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - The measurement of cognitive abilities across diverse cultural, racial, and ethnic groups has a contentious history, with broad political, legal, economic, and ethical repercussions. Advances in psychometric methods and converging scientific ideas about genetic variation afford new tools and theoretical contexts to move beyond the reflective analysis of between-group test score discrepancies. Neuropsychology is poised to benefit from these advances to cultivate a richer understanding of the factors that underlie cognitive test score disparities. To this end, the present article considers several topics relevant to the measurement of cognitive abilities across groups from diverse ancestral origins, including fairness and bias, equivalence, diagnostic validity, item response theory, and differential item functioning.

AB - The measurement of cognitive abilities across diverse cultural, racial, and ethnic groups has a contentious history, with broad political, legal, economic, and ethical repercussions. Advances in psychometric methods and converging scientific ideas about genetic variation afford new tools and theoretical contexts to move beyond the reflective analysis of between-group test score discrepancies. Neuropsychology is poised to benefit from these advances to cultivate a richer understanding of the factors that underlie cognitive test score disparities. To this end, the present article considers several topics relevant to the measurement of cognitive abilities across groups from diverse ancestral origins, including fairness and bias, equivalence, diagnostic validity, item response theory, and differential item functioning.

KW - Cross-cultural neuropsychology

KW - Differential item functioning

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Genomics

KW - Measurement

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53949114017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53949114017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11065-008-9067-9

DO - 10.1007/s11065-008-9067-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 18814034

AN - SCOPUS:53949114017

VL - 18

SP - 184

EP - 193

JO - Neuropsychology Review

JF - Neuropsychology Review

SN - 1040-7308

IS - 3 SPEC. ISS.

ER -