Matryoshka Project: Lessons learned about early intervention in psychosis programme development

Chiachen Cheng, Carolyn S Dewa, Paula Goering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: This part of the Matryoshka project sought to understand the processes with which early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programmes were implemented and developed. The goals were to understand the key influences of programme implementation in the context of rapid EIP service growth and lack of specific provincial guidelines. Methods: Sampling was purposive and data were collected with semi-structured interviews. Five Matryoshka Project programmes were successfully contacted. All interviews were conducted by phone, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Emerging themes were analysed iteratively and discussed among authors. Key themes were validated with participants. Results: The new EIP services were significantly influenced by the provincial EIP network, advocacy groups and clinical mentors. EIP programme decision makers often relied on each other for guidance. Although the research evidence assisted programme decision makers to develop an effective EIP model for their region, implementation was often shaped by funding constraints. Programmes adapted their EIP models according to funding and local service characteristics. The lack of specific guidelines may have allowed innovation; programme creativity and diversity is consistent with EIP values. Despite the challenges related to geography and staffing, programmes experienced important successes such as partnerships across sectors, quality clinical service and the ability to engage hard-to-serve clientele. Conclusions: Although important, research evidence played only a secondary role. Relationships among providers and services, coupled with the dedication of front-line staff, were more critical to knowledge exchange than written documents alone. These findings stress the importance of researcher-front-line relationships to the adoption of evidence-informed practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Program Development
Psychotic Disorders
Guidelines
Interviews
Mentors
Geography
Aptitude
Creativity
Anniversaries and Special Events
Research
Research Personnel
Growth

Keywords

  • Early intervention
  • Health policy
  • Mental health service
  • Schizophrenia and disorder with psychotic feature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Matryoshka Project : Lessons learned about early intervention in psychosis programme development. / Cheng, Chiachen; Dewa, Carolyn S; Goering, Paula.

In: Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 5, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 64-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bc6cbba1e33440c9e35434c15b24b9e,
title = "Matryoshka Project: Lessons learned about early intervention in psychosis programme development",
abstract = "Aim: This part of the Matryoshka project sought to understand the processes with which early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programmes were implemented and developed. The goals were to understand the key influences of programme implementation in the context of rapid EIP service growth and lack of specific provincial guidelines. Methods: Sampling was purposive and data were collected with semi-structured interviews. Five Matryoshka Project programmes were successfully contacted. All interviews were conducted by phone, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Emerging themes were analysed iteratively and discussed among authors. Key themes were validated with participants. Results: The new EIP services were significantly influenced by the provincial EIP network, advocacy groups and clinical mentors. EIP programme decision makers often relied on each other for guidance. Although the research evidence assisted programme decision makers to develop an effective EIP model for their region, implementation was often shaped by funding constraints. Programmes adapted their EIP models according to funding and local service characteristics. The lack of specific guidelines may have allowed innovation; programme creativity and diversity is consistent with EIP values. Despite the challenges related to geography and staffing, programmes experienced important successes such as partnerships across sectors, quality clinical service and the ability to engage hard-to-serve clientele. Conclusions: Although important, research evidence played only a secondary role. Relationships among providers and services, coupled with the dedication of front-line staff, were more critical to knowledge exchange than written documents alone. These findings stress the importance of researcher-front-line relationships to the adoption of evidence-informed practice.",
keywords = "Early intervention, Health policy, Mental health service, Schizophrenia and disorder with psychotic feature",
author = "Chiachen Cheng and Dewa, {Carolyn S} and Paula Goering",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00255.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "64--69",
journal = "Early Intervention in Psychiatry",
issn = "1751-7885",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Matryoshka Project

T2 - Lessons learned about early intervention in psychosis programme development

AU - Cheng, Chiachen

AU - Dewa, Carolyn S

AU - Goering, Paula

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Aim: This part of the Matryoshka project sought to understand the processes with which early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programmes were implemented and developed. The goals were to understand the key influences of programme implementation in the context of rapid EIP service growth and lack of specific provincial guidelines. Methods: Sampling was purposive and data were collected with semi-structured interviews. Five Matryoshka Project programmes were successfully contacted. All interviews were conducted by phone, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Emerging themes were analysed iteratively and discussed among authors. Key themes were validated with participants. Results: The new EIP services were significantly influenced by the provincial EIP network, advocacy groups and clinical mentors. EIP programme decision makers often relied on each other for guidance. Although the research evidence assisted programme decision makers to develop an effective EIP model for their region, implementation was often shaped by funding constraints. Programmes adapted their EIP models according to funding and local service characteristics. The lack of specific guidelines may have allowed innovation; programme creativity and diversity is consistent with EIP values. Despite the challenges related to geography and staffing, programmes experienced important successes such as partnerships across sectors, quality clinical service and the ability to engage hard-to-serve clientele. Conclusions: Although important, research evidence played only a secondary role. Relationships among providers and services, coupled with the dedication of front-line staff, were more critical to knowledge exchange than written documents alone. These findings stress the importance of researcher-front-line relationships to the adoption of evidence-informed practice.

AB - Aim: This part of the Matryoshka project sought to understand the processes with which early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programmes were implemented and developed. The goals were to understand the key influences of programme implementation in the context of rapid EIP service growth and lack of specific provincial guidelines. Methods: Sampling was purposive and data were collected with semi-structured interviews. Five Matryoshka Project programmes were successfully contacted. All interviews were conducted by phone, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Emerging themes were analysed iteratively and discussed among authors. Key themes were validated with participants. Results: The new EIP services were significantly influenced by the provincial EIP network, advocacy groups and clinical mentors. EIP programme decision makers often relied on each other for guidance. Although the research evidence assisted programme decision makers to develop an effective EIP model for their region, implementation was often shaped by funding constraints. Programmes adapted their EIP models according to funding and local service characteristics. The lack of specific guidelines may have allowed innovation; programme creativity and diversity is consistent with EIP values. Despite the challenges related to geography and staffing, programmes experienced important successes such as partnerships across sectors, quality clinical service and the ability to engage hard-to-serve clientele. Conclusions: Although important, research evidence played only a secondary role. Relationships among providers and services, coupled with the dedication of front-line staff, were more critical to knowledge exchange than written documents alone. These findings stress the importance of researcher-front-line relationships to the adoption of evidence-informed practice.

KW - Early intervention

KW - Health policy

KW - Mental health service

KW - Schizophrenia and disorder with psychotic feature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251586884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251586884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00255.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00255.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21272277

AN - SCOPUS:79251586884

VL - 5

SP - 64

EP - 69

JO - Early Intervention in Psychiatry

JF - Early Intervention in Psychiatry

SN - 1751-7885

IS - 1

ER -